Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Atty Mario Apuzzo & CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) were guests on the Howie Mandel Radio Show hosted by Jim 'Howie' Mandel - Tues 15 Mar 2011, 10:00 ET

Atty Mario Apuzzo & CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) were guests on the Howie Mandel Radio Show hosted by Jim 'Howie' Mandel - Tues 15 March 2011, 10:00 p.m. ET. The subject will be the Obama eligibility issue and states' rights issues in trying to pass Presidential Eligibility Assurance Acts and get them into effect before the 2012 primary and general election cycle. The Republican Party leadership in the State of GA is blocking the passage of a Presidential Eligibility Act to properly vet candidates in future elections for compliance to Article II, Section 1, the presidential eligibility clause. Why are the Republican leaders of the GA House of Reps blocking a simple law to support and defend a part of our U.S. Constitution given that Congress, the Courts, and the media have done nothing? Why are all our institutions throwing the Constitution under the bus and continuing to cover up for Obama's refusal to prove his true legal citizenship identity beyond reason doubt which he has not done to 2/3 of the American people. That issue and more will be discussed. Tune in.

Listen to the show at this link:

Posted by:
CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)



Mario and Charles,
We are set for tonights radio show. The phone lines will open at approx 1030pm for the audience to call in and ask questions. We will also have our live chat room up and open where registered listeners can ask real time questions, registration for the chat room is free. The call in number is (877)779-6410 the radio show website is

We will chat more tonight!!
Jim "Howie" Mandel Jr

Mario Apuzzo, Esq. said...

During the Jim “Howie” Mandel radio show this evening, I stated that during the Senate Resolution 511 approval process there was mention by someone as an aside that Obama was born in Hawaii. I said that it seemed stange that someone should mention where Obama was born when the issue was whether McCain was a "natural born Citizen." While we were on the air, a copy of Senate Resolution 511 was examined and shown no to contain any such declaration.

The reason why the Obama birth-place declaration was not found is that it is contained in the legal opinion memo written by Tribe and Olson which served as the legal foundation for Senate Resolution 511, not in the resolution itself. Here is the language:

“And Senator Barack Obama was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961—not long after its admission to the Union on August 21, 1959. We find it inconceivable that Senator Obama would have been ineligible for the Presidency had he been born two years earlier.”

Opinion of Laurence H. Tribe and Theodore B. Olson, dated March 19, 2008, reported in 154 Cong. Rec. S3645-46 (Apr. 30, 2008). This is the legal opinion that supports Senate Resolution 511declaring John McCain a “natural born citizen.”

Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162 (1875) confirmed that Emer de Vattel, in The Law of Nations, Section 212, is the source that provided the Founders and Framers the definition of a natural born citizen which definition is a child born in the country to citizen parents. While not citing Vattel by name, Minor provided Vattel’s definition of a “natural born citizen” almost verbatim. In fact, Minor told us that the Framers were familiar with the common law and then gave us Vattel’s definition of a “natural born Citizen” when telling us what that common law was. This surely was not the English common law. Hence, Minor shows that Vattel’s definition became incorporated into American common law. Our U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that Vattel may be relied upon in defining a “natural born Citizen.”

Note that Tribe and Olson did not rely upon Vattel Section 215 to declare McCain a “natural born citizen,” Vattel being the only source used by Minor which was also confirmed to be a valid source in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark which cited Minor and provided its Vattelian common law definition of a “natural born Citizen.”

Vattel could have provided Tribe and Olson with a much better argument for declaring McCain to be a “natural born Citizen,” for Vattel at Section 215 says that one who is born out of the country to parents serving in the armies of the state is reputed born in the country. Hence, McCain would be considered born in the country to citizen parents and thus a “natural born Citizen.” This is especially so since the U.S. Supreme Court in Minor had already relied upon Vattel to define a “natural born Citizen.” But then if Tribe and Olson used Vattel as authority for their opinion that McCain was a "natural born Citizen," they would have disqualified Obama from being President.

Mick said...

Tribe and Olsen also defined a natural born Citizen during the Resolution 511 hearings as "one born WITHIN the Territory AND ALLEGIANCE of a nation."
It is impossible that Obama was born WITHIN the allegiance of the US when he was born w/ extra allegiance to Britain (dual allegiance at best). They know by their definition that Obama is ineligible.


I have posted here;

A video which not only supports your cause in regards to Obama's citenzenship status but goes further in sueing the FOXNEWS organization because they have hidden the facts about Obama. The lawsuit will name several prominate media icons, Bill O Reilly, Sean Hannity, Ruport Murdock etc. I believe the "Birther Bills" within many of these states is a great start but more and more needs to be done.

The American people must wake up to the truths about the usurper of the constitution.

Thank You
Jim "Howie" Mandel Jr
"disclaimer" The opinions expressed within the video clip are the opinions of David Manning and not necessarily the opinions of Jim "Howie" Mandel Jr


Mario and Charles,

I will be conducting an interview on March 23rd 2011 at 10pm est with Lt Col Lakins brother and spokesman regarding is Court Marshal, sentencing, and life of military service to this great nation. I would urge your followers to log onto;

between now and then and register(free) which will allow them access to the live chat room which will be open during the show. There are many listeners who never call into a live show for many reasons, however, many will log onto a chat room board and voice their comments / questions thru this medium of techonology. I would also urge your followers to log onto;

were we have archived dozens and dozens of documents which go back 50-60-70 years and layout a clear concise present day danger to the fabric of this country, the fabric of Freedom and Liberty.

I look forward to our next radio show together.

Until Then!!
Jim "Howie" Mandel Jr

cfkerchner said...

A suggested narrative to explain an event that has not been explained to date.

A person asked me the other night on the radio show why would the Daily Kos have to forge a Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth (COLB) when Obama could have easily obtained a real one. As you recall the Daily Kos put up the first digital internet image of the Obama COLB which later was picked up by Obama's campaign site, not vice versa. I have thought about this. Knowing that imo there is an actual vital record for Obama in Hawaii due to the likely false registration of Obama being born their by his maternal grandmother, Grandma Dunham, and that falsified registration triggered the two newspaper announcements which were placed routinely by the Bureau of Health in those two newspapers every week or two as public service reporting births registered, real births or false filings such as Grandma Dunhams for Obama. We also know from research by others that Obama's vital records have been amended. Thus comes to my mind why I think Obama could not get a real COLB from Hawaii and publish that on the net. I believe now that he was falsely registered as born in Honolulu by the Grandma under the name of Barack Hussein Obama II. But at age 5 or less he was adopted by his new step-father Lolo Soetoro. Thus his birth records in Hawaii were amended to a new name, Barry Soetoro, or Soebarkah Soetoro (the name mentioned in the mother's passport file found via the FOIA request by Strunk). Barry Soetoro of course became his nickname since Soebarkah Soetoro was a mouth full to pronounce. I believe that Obama never had that record legally changed back to Barack Hussein Obama II. Thus he could not get an official COLB from Hawaii because the name would show up as Soetoro, not Obama. Thus his corrupt and criminal helpers forged a COLB as a digital image and put it on the net at Daily Kos. It was then picked up at other sites and eventually Obama put it up on his site. Obama is now stuck with that forged image and picture since he adopted it as his own. Just like he is stuck with the SSN identity theft charge because he used it for his name in the back dated Selective Service registration. Thus, imo, he could not use a real COLB from Hawaii in 2008 because it still showed the amended record with his adopted name of Soetoro. But this would explain why he had to have someone forge a COLB image for his campaign. This is a test explanation and is not 100% proven of course. Comments, feedback, and criticism of this postulated theory of why a COLB had to be forged instead of getting a real one from HI in 2008 or 2007, as the case may be. Now possibly he has had his record amended a second time to put his current name back in the HI vital records system. Only when we get certified copies of the true and correct copies of the original birth registration docs and all subsequent amendments will we know the truth. As I said, this is just a theory at this point. JMHO.

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)

Let us move forward said...

More on the Social Security Number:

According to the licensed private investigator Daniels, the SSN was issued in 1977 to a individual about Mr. Obama's age and who died at age 19. Other than the SS registration (which may be false) dated 1980, the first use of the SSN found by Daniels was in Chicago in 1986. (Didn't Mr. Obama claim to work for some company in New York after he graduated from Columbia?)

I had read somewhere about reissuing SSN for individuals deceased for many years, but can't find anything about it today. Surely there would be a multiple year waiting period should a SSN be reissued.

MichaelN said...

Posted at

Re: Lord Coke - Calvin's case
The alien born Frenchman, visiting in amity was a subject of the king of England.
"Concerning the local obedience, it is observable, that as there is a local protection on the King’s part, so there is a local ligeance of the subject’s part. And this appeareth in 4 Mar. Br. 32. and 3 and 4 Ph. and Mar. Dyer 144. Sherley a Frenchman, being in amity with the King, came into England, and joyned with divers subjects of this realm in treason against the Kingand Queen, and the indictment concluded contra ligeant’ suae debitum;51 for he owed to the King a local obedience, that is, so long as he was within the King’s protection: which local obedience, being but momentary and incertain, is strong enough to make a natural subject; for if he hath issue here, that issue is a natural born subject
"[33. ][Ed.: protection attracts subjection, and subjection protection.]"
"The third is ligeantia localis46 wrought by the law, and that is when an alien that is in amity cometh into England, because as long as he is within England, he is within the King’s protection; therefore so long as he is there, he oweth unto the King a local obedience or ligeance, for that the one (as it hath been said) draweth the other."
Calvin was adjudged a natural born subject, by way of TWO essential qualities.
"There is found in the law four kinds of ligeances: the first is, ligeantia naturalis, absoluta, pura, et indefinita,42 and this originally is due by NATURE AND BIRTHRIGHT, and is called alta ligeantia42a and he that oweth this is called subditus natus."
"Calvin the Plaintiff naturalized by PROCREATION AND BIRTHRIGHT"
So it appears there were TWO essential qualities to make a natural born subject.
The subject/citizenship status of the parent father mattered.
"that issue is no subject to the King of England, though he be born upon his soyl, and under his meridian, for that he was not born UNDER THE LIGEANCE OF A SUBJECT,"
What does this mean?
Sanguinis and soli, that's what it means!
Why did Justice Horace Gray in Wong Kim Ark case not mention these important points, that were expressed by Lord Coke, and which were crucial to the task at hand of attempting to define US 'natural born Citizen'?
Why are these important & crucial points from Calvin's case not discussed generally in the legal commentators?
Posted by: MichaelN | Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 09:21 PM

The Stacker said...


Why does it matter that he was adopted? The facts of his birth are the facts of his birth. A birth certificate that is amended doesn't change his natural born status, regardless of your definition.

Does it change his "citizenship" status, however? I ask you. I don't know the answer.

puzo1moderator said...


His adoption has nothing to do with his birth status. However if he was adopted he had an amendment to his birth record which changed his legal name to Soebarkah Soetoro and never legally changed it back. Thus if he ordered a copy of his real COLB it would have shown his amended birth record name of Soetoro and not Obama. Thus he had to forge a COLB and put it up on Daily Kos. That could be one thing he is hiding in his birth registration and amendment records in HI.

CDR Kerchner (Ret)

Carlyle said...

It seems fairly clear (99% certainty?) that Barack Obama does not legally exist and that Barry Soetoro is not an American Citizen.

Barack Obama may have existed at one point and MAY (but knowbody knows) have been born in Hawaii, and therefore NATIVE born.

But since he is no longer a citizen, the circumstances of his birth are irrelevant. I get frustrated that arguing the fine points of NBC may be a red herring.

I wish we could focus harder on prying loose his records and finding people who knew him during the first 20 years.

I believe therein lies THE STORY. That is the truth we need. We need to work harder in supporting the likes of Jack Cashill in outing the FACT that The Obamessiah did not write those "memoirs".

That alone would cause Hisself to "crash and burn".

Unknown said...

Mario, OT, but would you check out what this man is saying and see if he is correct? Thank you. He is talking about going to court, but not suing. Filing a complaint with Judge on misprison of fraud, etc. I don’t know if you have time to check this out with all you are doing. Just another angle someone has, this maybe something we can all do.

Anonymous said...

Mario & Charles,

Official US Gvt News releases posted in the NY Times in the summer of 1859

“Subject to the Jurisdiction”: You Can’t Have It Both Ways UPDATED with 2 Official Proclamations From The US Administration of 1859

MichaelN said...

Mario & Charles.

No independent members in congress.
Two parties by definition, one party by behavior.

One independent in senate, i.e. Al Franken.

He is apparently the only hope within the ranks of political representatives, who may be able to bring the Obama fraud to the table.

I suggest arranging a meeting with Al Franken, take all the evidence you can muster along with your written articles and try him out, to take up the matter of Obama's fraud.