Wednesday, October 7, 2009

The Andrea Shea King Show - BlogTalkRadio - 9-11 pm, EDT, Thursday, 8 Oct 2009

Andrea Shea King interviews Mario Apuzzo, Attorney, and Charles Kerchner, Lead Plaintiff, in the Kerchner et al and Obama & Congress et al lawsuit currently awaiting decisions on two motions before Judge Simandle since July in the federal district court in Camden NJ.

BlogTalkRadio - The Andrea Shea King Show - 9-11 pm, EDT, Thursday, 8 Oct 2009.

For more about the lawsuit and to help see these websites:


jayjay said...

By all means, don't fail to mention the fund-raising site where any and all donations will help pay for more advertorials.

That's a worthwhile use of the funds since it helps to educate people who may be unaware.

cfkerchner said...

Hi JayJay,

I will. And for those reading here, here is the URL to the publicity and education fund raising site for this lawsuit:

We need and appreciate all the help we can get. Thanks to all who have donated.

Charles Kerchner
Lead Plaintiff

shakes said...

Mario and Charles....if you haven't read this report it is very good....I know that the two of you probably know most of the stuff in it but there may be some stuff you don't know about that could help your case.....J:)

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

cfkerchner said...

Jackie Smith's links as active links:

Part I:

Part II:

Part III;

A pen said...

Jackie, The honorable Justice Story was indeed insightful however the predicament is not now one of vetting it is one of removing one who has been unconstitutionally seated. There is no constitutional measure for this nor is there precedent.

Given the great and obvious danger of such an act it is without question a matter of survival of the constitution/ nation. In my own humble opinion I believe we ought to reference our current state of affairs against the last time a power reduced the people of this land to mere taxpayers whose grievances were a thorn in the side of that power, the king of England. I refer to the fact that history need not repeat itself in whole to be found true and thus wisdom should dictate a more favorable outcome when the present begs to be reconciled with the past. " When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

shakes said...

A Pen...I agree with you but I am reminded everyday that are are still millions of people out there who are not educated about what has taken place over the years in this country....Constitutionally speaking did a great job of exposing this and we have to do our part to get this information out and inform the ignorant and apathetic masses. Charles thank you for posting the live links....I didn't realize they weren't live.....and thank you and Mario for your dedication to this cause. I listen to your radio shows when I can and you both do a great job....I believe your case is the best to get our rights heard and acted upon!! God bless and speed your success.

Jackie Smith:)

cfkerchner said...

The Federal Courts Are Committing Treason to the Constitution per Chief Justice John Marshall.

The federal courts and judges are committing treason to the Constitution by not taking jurisdiction and getting to the merits in the various cases before them regarding the Article II eligibility clause question for Obama.

It is worth keeping in mind the words of U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall when he wrote in Cohens v. Virginia 19 US 264 (1821):

"It is most true that this Court will not take jurisdiction if it should not: but it is equally true, that it must take jurisdiction if it should. The judiciary cannot, as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches the confines of the constitution. We cannot pass it by because it is doubtful. With whatever doubts, with whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, we must decide it, if it be brought before us. We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the constitution. Questions may occur which we would gladly avoid; but we cannot avoid them. All we can do is, to exercise our best judgment, and conscientiously to perform our duty. In doing this, on the present occasion, we find this tribunal invested with appellate jurisdiction in all cases arising under the constitution and laws of the United States. We find no exception to this grant, and we cannot insert one."

Link to the treason quote in case context:

Link to Case Summary:

Link to Full Case:

The Judge in the Kerchner v Obama & Congress lawsuit and the Judges in the other cases should simply read the words of U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Marshall from the past and take jurisdiction of the constitutional question of the Article II eligibility clause in the Constitution and proceed to a fact finding hearing and trial on the merits to see if Obama is Constitutionally eligible or not. I say Obama is NOT eligible. But we need the federal courts to take the cases and get a SCOTUS ruling to settle this.

Charles F. Kerchner, Jr.
Lead Plaintiff
Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al