Sunday, May 1, 2011

Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) were on the Les Naiman radio show, WGTK 970 in Louisville KY, hosted by Les Naiman, on Sunday, 1 May 2011 at 6:10 p.m EDT

Les Naiman Show
Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) were on the Les Naiman radio show, WGTK 970 in Louisville KY, hosted by Les Naiman, on Sunday, 1 May 2011 at 6:10 p.m. EDT. The subject will be the Obama eligibility issue and the recent action by Obama in releasing an alleged long form birth certificate image onto the internet on the White House website.  The image has been declared a blatant forgery by several document experts. Further comparisons here.  It was created out of whole cloth in the same vein as the original short form Certification of Live Birth forgery image released onto the net in June 2008 by the Daily Kos website and by Obama's Fight The Smears website. Obama has not presented any paper documents issued directly from the State of Hawaii Health Department to any controlling legal authority.  All we have are internet images.  In the age of PhotoShop and Adobe Illustrator software no one should trust any image on the internet.  Especially for the vetting of political candidates.  One thing is different this time.  Obama himself has claimed ownership of this latest round of suspicious internet images.  He cannot say someone else did this and he knew nothing about it.  He personally owns this deception and misinformation process and issue completely now.

Listen to the show at this link via podcast (when available in a couple hours):

Posted by:
CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)


puzo1moderator said...

Terminology is important in this issue. The short form is labeled at top a CERTIFICATION of Live Birth. The long form is labeled at top a CERTIFICATE of Live Birth. People need to get that difference in document names drilled into there heads when speaking about these two forms. Especially Donald Trump. ;-)

puzo1moderator said...

Obama birth certificate forgery analysis -- OCR Theory Debunked For Obama Birth Certificate! 90° Rotated Elements Found! | by nick10463 | @ YouTube

When will Congress and the FBI investigate this blatant birth certificate document forgery placed on the White House servers by Obama and team.

CDR Kerchner (Ret)

MichaelIsGreat said...

Hello Mr. Apuzzo,

Please, make sure you emphasize the fact that Obama is NOT eligible to be President of the USA because he is not a natural born citizen. And he is NOT a natural born citizen because his father needed to be an American citizen and instead he was from Kenya that was, at that time, governed by Great Britain.
Therefore, Obama must be removed from Office AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

Obama has already bankrupted the USA, he even started a third war in a third Muslim country, and therefore the sooner he goes back to Kenya, the better it will be for the USA!!

Joe said...

Great show guys.

Is there anyway a list of documents and cases can be made on any information just about the definition of natural born citizen?

from before the constitution to date.

Robert said...

The State of Hawaii obviously has no documents to substantiate that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961. They should just say so. Yes, we can handle it! Obama is just not that important. Our Constitution is.

The Hawaiian effort to give cover to Obama is putting our country at great risk. It is undermining the rule of law and the expectation of equal protection under the law.

It is not believable that a governor can’t find and see a vital state document relevant to the honor and integrity of his state, but one unelected official beneath him can.

It is not believable that a citizen can not receive a certified copy of his own birth records including all information collected and retained by the state pertaining to that document. If nobody can see this information and documentation, what purpose does it have?

It is not believable that an original document that has been physically handled and described in detail by a government official has to be computer generated instead of just being photocopied, stamped, sealed and certified in 2011. Why not just copy the “partially handwritten” document that Mr. Obama authorized for release to the public and sent his attorney to collect? Federal Express and UPS both offer low cost overnight delivery – at least as fast as sending someone to and from Hawaii – and a lot less expensive.

Mr. Obama is required by Amendment XX to “qualify” for the office of POTUS. This means that in addition to receiving a certifiably legal and majority vote he is responsible to prove that he has reached the age of 35, has 14 years residency, and that he is a “Natural Born Citizen”.

Hawaii, as Obama’s alleged home state, is a primary party to that Amendment XX requirement. Hawaii is a State! They must release any and all documentation and information in their possession pertaining to the qualification or disqualification of any person who seeks federal office, especially POTUS. This is the obvious duty of all member states of our republic. It goes to the heart of our union which is the mutual security and defense of each and every member state against all enemies foreign and domestic. For Hawaii to claim that Obama’s records can’t be released due to personal privacy issues is ludicrous on its face. Hawaii has really let us down on this one.

A Natural Born Citizen is one born of citizen parents (plural) within the boundaries and complete jurisdiction of the United States. A natural born citizen has no divided allegiances.

If any of the alleged Hawaiian produced documents are reliable they prove that Mr. Obama is not a natural born citizen. They confirm that his father was a British/Kenyan subject and that our now putative president was born under British jurisdiction. He is not eligible.

Obama, if born in Hawaii, is a “native-born” citizen, If he was born in Kenya (AKA Kenya Colony or East Africa Protectorate in 1961), as also asserted, he is not even a citizen. He has never presented any record of naturalization. Reminder, no matter where he was born even he agrees that he was born under British jurisdiction.

All citizens, “native-born”, “naturalized” and “natural born” are guaranteed the protection of their individual and inalienable rights by our Constitutional Republic. Only the “natural born” are eligible for the office of the President or the Vice President. No one has a “right” to either of these offices. It’s a matter of national security.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq. said...

Tavis Smiley, in his article, “What did birthers give us? Ignorance,” accessed at , complains about the “birthers” challenging Obam’s Article II eligibility to be President. He calls the “birther” issue a “folly.” He calls the “birthers” “ignorant, … foolish, factually-challenged and thoroughly uneducated.” He further called them a “small, un-informed minority” and called Donald Trump “one publicity-starved reality TV purveyor.”
He adds: “Regardless of the motives behind the birther movement - political gain, ignorance, or something more sinister - the issue struck some of us as more than a little curious given that it involved a black man whose name does not sound typically American.” He goes on about how civil they should all be and that they should respect the President who has been only humiliated by the terrible “birthers.” He says that they should discuss political issues and not Obama’s eligibility to be President. He states that “when we allow falsehoods to trump the truth, real accountability gets lost in the fictional fog.”

Implying that people like the “birthers” are responsible for the shooting of Congresswoman Gabby Giffords, he states: “Sadly, those who cynically swam at the bottom of the birther barrel dealt civility a terrible blow.”

Ironically, he then closes with these quotes:

"You're entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts."

“And let's remember that politics may determine who has the power, not the truth.”

Does Mr. Smiley realize what he said? Does he realize that we have not seen Obama deal with facts? Does he realize that Obama has rather stirred opinion and race relations rather than confront the facts of his birth circumstances? Does he realize that Obama has ripped our nation apart racially rather than deal with those facts? Does he realize that his so-called “birthers” have been fighting to get to the truth of the matter concerning whether Obama is eligible for the Office of President which has nothing to do with Obama’s race or color but rather all to do with the Constitution and that they have been thwarted in that effort because of power politics? Mr. Smiley should practice what he preaches.

puzo1moderator said...

It is being reported as I write this that Osama bin Laden has been killed by a U.S. drone strike ... a few days ago.

CDR Kerchner (Ret)

puzo1moderator said...

Update on Bin Laden. New report. It was a commando type raid today. He was killed directly by American troops with American bullets.

Bravo Zulu!

puzo1moderator said...

Correction. The commando raid was several days ago.

MichaelN said...

Give some support here and counter the dis-information espoused by the traitorous lot.

bdwilcox said...

I'm sorry, but this bin Laden business is the world's biggest load of BS. With Obama's numbers tanking, his long form proven a fraud and an election rapidly approaching, suddenly, out of nowhere, he gets to play the hero and "do what George Bush couldn't do in eight years" blah, blah, blah. I love the fact that they buried bin Laden's body at sea and no evidence is offered...

Call me a cynic, call me a conspiracy theorist, whatever. But this is an intelligence operation. And it's a blitzkrieg intelligence operation. First the long form, then the father's papers, now killing America's #1 enemy. What's next? Healing the sick and giving sight to the blind?

I'm sorry, I don't buy it. We've been lied to for so long from this Leviathan government, why should this be trusted? I don't believe a single word that comes out of this regime of lies.

bdwilcox said...

Oh, and to further the intelligence blitzkrieg, Obama's stolen SS# and falsified selective service application go before the 9th Circuit court today for oral arguments. I'm sure sure distraction is merely coincidental.

bdwilcox said...

Further proof that this was an intelligence operation (picture of dead Osama - don't open it if you're squeamish). Nothing coming from this regime is true. Nothing.

These guys in PsyOps sure do love their Photoshop, don't they?

jayjay said...


Gee ... you don't suppose that Barky and his Brothers-In-Crime would crime would LIE, (do you?)???

Sort of like a 3-card monte if that's the case!!

js said...

i get to laughing at the juvenile technology this surrounds...its an "abstract"...of the "record" on file...seeing how this is NOT a true copy of an original, but an altered document (which is substantiated through the history of editing contained in the PDF document that the WH released)

shoot...onaka isnt stupid...ive never seen a notary stamp like that one...he is working his way into a weave of words that will allow him to walk away unconvicted of a crime...if one is exposed...this is obviously a "collection of information" to facilitate the assembly an abstract birth certificate for BHO...and could come from more than 1 actual document in the record held by Hawaii...and other pertinent information that they may have included, like place of birth assumptions...

yes, this document could have been made by the DOH in Hawaii...under orders from the Governor himself, or some other unknown entity cover for a lifelong friend and/or political ally...

the status of valid state secrets have done far worse i am sure...if it were done under what the socialist regime in charge..considered national security...

exactly how far would America's security apparatus go to protect a sitting president...and how far would members within the State Government of Hawaii facilitate this document for a sitting president...

its simple to see that a serious professional would have created a much cleaner PDF...its easy to understand how a state employee could have assembled this document and never realized the trail of editing that existed in information left in the document itself...anyone with a few hours training could have done this

hokiedokie24 said...

Mario or Charles,

Will someone ever define what a Natural Born Citizen is?? Has it ever been proven that both parents need to be US citizens?? I have wanted Obama out of office and can't understand why the courts will not at least give us a definition of natural born citizen.

puzo1moderator said...

New Flier/Handout: Obama's Lack of Eligibility - The Three Enablers! Print some out and pass them around.

CDR Kerchner (Ret)

Mario Apuzzo, Esq. said...

The State of Hawaii also issued a press release on April 27, 2011, confirming that it made two copies of Obama's long-form Certificate of Live Birth and provided them to him. Read the press release here:

Mario Apuzzo, Esq. said...

Here is an article that states that the "fleet of amateur Birther image analysts" got it wrong in concluding that Obama's on-line long-form birth certificate has been humanly altered and/or is a forgery.

First, the writer argues that one of the reasons the "layers" appear as they do is that a compression algorithm computer program does things when it compresses information which humans would not expect it to do. He/she says that the results of the layers is caused by how program algorithms store black and white versus color images and other objects. He states "[e]very single “anomaly” identified by the fleet of amateur Birther 'image analysts' in an attempt to discredit the Obama long form is directly attributable to the compression algorithms applied to the PDF between scanning and publishing on-line. None of them are signs of forgery or fraud, and all of them are so obviously generated by a non-human process that it is sometimes difficult to credit even amateur sleuths with simply not noticing them."

He adds that a forger would not act in such a fashion.

Second, the writer says the reason for some letters or objects appearing twice in identical form ("identical pixel patterns) is that the program to save space (avoid "redundancy") will store an object that is close enough in form to another same object (e.g. the "B" in Obama's name and the Miss Tickly twin boxes) just once rather than store each individual repetitive object and then just publish the one representative object when publishing the whole document.

The analysis may be read at

I am not a computer expert but the reasoning of the analysis seems weak. I am very suspect of the reasoning of this article because the writer does not tell us that he/she was able by controlled experiment to produce the same type of effect as what we see in the Obama on-line image. This expert's objectivity also is suspect given that he/she uses the expression "fleet of amateur Birther image analysts.'"

Your comments on this article are welcome.