Sunday, January 25, 2015

Attorney Mario Apuzzo on Moretti Underground Radio—Is Senator Ted Cruz a Natural Born Citizen?

Attorney Mario Apuzzo on Moretti Underground Radio—Is Senator Ted Cruz a Natural Born Citizen?

January 25, 2015
By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

On Monday, January 26, 2015, at 9:00 PM Eastern Standard Time, I will be a guest of Hosts Jo Anne Moretti and Scott Farrarello on the radio show, Moretti Underground, broadcast on the PRN Radio Network – Patriot Radio.  The topic of discussion will be whether Senator Ted Cruz is an Article II natural born citizen.  Based on my research, it is my opinion that Senator Cruz, like de facto President Barack Obama, is not an Article II natural born citizen and therefore not eligible to be President and Commander in Chief of the Military.  During the show, I will be discussing my research and opinion which I have drawn from that research. 
I hope that you can join Jo Anne, Scott, and me and call in with your questions. 

You can also access the custom web site chatroom at

The show can be accessed at .  The call in telephone number is (714) 888-7404.  

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
January 25, 2015

Copyright © 2015
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
All Rights Reserved 


Unknown said...

This one has been a personal crusade to present the truth to the American people. I did the research, read the articles, and learned there are a lot of liars and frauds with name recognition today!

Never stop shining light on this! We have to return to Rule of Law and end the deceit!

phil stone said...

also not eligible for citizenship reasons,Santorum,Haley,Rubio,and Jindal -- old Marine Phil Stone

Mario Apuzzo, Esq. said...


The Obots, who do not have the historical and legal sources to defend their position that all born citizens, regardless of how they obtained their born citizen status, are natural born citizens (they throw "natural" out the window), resort to name calling, personal attacks, ridicule, and distortion of our position that the one and only one universal definition of a natural born citizen the Framers used when they adopted the Constitution is a child born in a country to parents who were its citizens at the time of the child's birth, meaning, when applied to the United States, a child born in the United States to parents who were both U.S. citizens at the time of the child's birth. See Emer de Vattel, The Law of Nations, Section 212 (1758) (1797) ) (“The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens”); Minor v. Happersett (1875) (“‘At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children, born in a country, of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners”); U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) (distinguished a "natural born citizen" as so originally defined by the common law at the time of the adoption of the Constitution per Minor from a "citizen" at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment which was ratified 81 years after the adoption of the Constitution).

If you consider the Obot talking points, you will note that the Obots do not address our historical and legal sources. Rather, they just ignore them and replace reasoned discussion with their attempted ridicule and irrelevant personal attacks.