Monday, August 9, 2010

Ad - Citizen vs "natural born Citizen" - with Obama It's Don't Ask, Don't Tell - 09 Aug 2010 issue Wash Times Natl Wkly - pg 5

Ad Headline: "Citizen" vs "natural born Citizen" - with Obama's constitutional eligibility question and exact citizenship status, it's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"
Printed in: 09 Aug 2010 issue Washington Times National Weekly - pg 5

Link to Ad:

Adjectives mean something. Obama was possibly born a "Citizen of the United States" but he was NOT born a "natural born Citizen of the United States" to constitutional standards:

Obama probably was Not Born in Hawaii - The Evidence: and

The Cover-up:

Please Cast Your Votes to Help the Cause

1st: Vote for Mario to be a Guest: Please add your vote here in addition to making a comment if desired to get Attorney Mario Apuzzo on the air with the Judge Andrew Napolitano to discuss this issue. Go to this link and click on the vote button and cast 3 of your 10 votes for Mario Apuzzo. Here is the link to vote for Mario:

2nd: Vote for "natural born Citizenship" as a Show Topic: Please add your vote in addition to making a comment for this new TV Show topic suggested by JTX at the Judge Andrew Napolitano "Freedom Watch" TV show suggestion forum. Go to this link and click on the vote button and cast 3 of your 10 votes for the show topic to be "natural born Citizenship". Vote for the new show topic idea at this link:


A comment and statement from CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) ...
Every military order Barack Obama gives as Commander-in-Chief, every bill he signs into law, and every executive decision and order he makes while unconstitutionally seated in the Office of President, is unconstitutional, and hence illegal. Obama is NOT an Article II "natural born Citizen of the United States" to constitutional standards. Adjectives mean something. And the term "natural born" in front of "Citizen of the United States" meant something very special to the founders of this nation and the framers of the Constitution. It meant birth with sole allegiance and claims on the person at birth by one and only one country, the United States. And that meaning via the words of Vattel codifying natural law has been cited in many Supreme Court decisions as being from the words of Emer de Vattel's preeminent legal treatise of the founding time period, The Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law. This legal book was used by the founders of our country such as Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, John Jay, and George Washington. Vattel defined a "natural born Citizen" via natural law as a person who is born in the country to two parents who are Citizens of that country. Obama's father was not a Citizen, he was not even an immigrant to this country, and in fact Obama's father was not even a permanent resident in this country. He was a British Subject and a sojourning alien visitor to this country here to attend college. He never had an intent to become a Citizen of this country. Thus his son Barack Hussein Obama II was born a British Subject from his father per the British Nationality Act of 1948 which governed Obama at his birth, no matter where he was born to a British Subject. Obama was born a British Subject with dual allegiances to more than one country and thus he can never be considered to be an "natural born Citizen" of any country.

The U.S. Courts and the Congress MUST address the merits of the charges against Obama for this constitutional issue, and if he is not who he says he is as this lawsuit alleges, they must constitutionally remove Barack Obama or he must resign, in order to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, the fundamental law of our land. We are a nation of laws not men. And even the high and mighty, high flying Obama, last from Chicago, is not above the law. To protect the Constitution and our nation of laws is their duty and sworn OATH to the Constitution and to the American people who trusted them when they were elected to Congress and took the oath and when these judges and justices were appointed and confirmed by them and they took the oath. Will they keep ignoring their oath on this grave matter of constitutional precedence as to defending the black letter law in the eligibility clause of Article II of the U.S. Constitution and the historic national security standard as to who can serve as President and Commander in Chief of the military. Or will they continue to allow a usurper in charge of our government and of our military ... and cowardly avoid the issue with obfuscations and technicalities to avoid the merits of the charges? Will the main stream media and press keep allowing them to do it? What has happened to the 4th Estate of our government. It no longer serves to protect the People and root out frauds and corruption. But instead, it caters to the ruling class inside the beltway in Washington DC to protect the corrupt and the frauds. May God save America and us all if those that took that solemn oath to the Constitution and are now down in Washington DC to justly govern and protect us and the rule of law, do not stand up to protect the Constitution and to protect us from a domestic enemy and continue the aversion of addressing the merits of the charges brought by this lawsuit and the thousands and thousands of letters and calls from the People and seriously investigate in a court of law or a Senate hearing with full subpoena powers by both parties the true legal identity of Obama. Will they stand up and defend Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 (the presidential eligibility clause) of the U.S. Constitution from usurpation or will they all continue the cover up of this matter and the historic constitutional crisis that has been created by Obama's fraud in the 2008 election and his usurpation of office and power since? Will they stand up before it is too late?

Charles Kerchner, Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress


Lani said...

Don't forget to hit the "Vote" button at the top right. You can assign as many as 3 votes to each subject. Just entering a comment doesn't add a vote.

jayjay said...

Mario is up to #6 nominally (some of those above him have already been interviewed) on the Guest List.

On the "Show Topics" list, the ""natural born Citizen" neaning in Natural Law & Supreme COurt" is already in the top 50 ... and has just been started a couple of days ago. Time to boost that topic ...

cfkerchner said...

Mario is now #5 out of almost 300 names suggested.

Vote for Mario and get him to level #4. You don't need to register or comment to Vote. Go to the below linked page and simply click on the VOTE button and cast 3 of your allotted votes for Mario.

After that vote for Mario, then go to the below linked page and cast 3 votes for the subject of the show to be "natural born Citizen" meaning in Natural Law and in prior Supreme Court decisions.

Pass this request and links on to family, friends, and associates on your email lists.

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)


Joe said...

Sorry if you already posted it,

but when is the appeal to the Supreme Court due?

thanks in advance

cfkerchner said...


As to when it is due, as I understand it, we have 90 days from the date of the U.S. 3rd Circuit panel's decision in July. But as to when we will file, that is confidential. But I can tell you Attorney Apuzzo is diligently working on it.

A pen said...

Voted, with conviction. I believe Mario would bring a personality to the media circus that is sorely needed. His professional courtesy and ability to stay on point and within the bounds of law without deviating into opinion or ad hominem are, IMO, much needed. He will set an example the majority will respect and listen to. Time is running short to give the public the truth and the reasoning required to defend it. Soon it shall be prudent to say may God have mercy on this nations enemies instead of just saving her.

cfkerchner said...

Mario is now ranked 4th and climbing. Pass the below 'vote for Mario link' along by email and post it in forums with discussion threads by patriots who are concerned about protecting our Constitution.

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)

Joe said...

So that would be around Oct.2nd. counting from the date of the decision that affirmed the dismissal.

If the SCOTUS does not hear the case, I think it will be clear that the only way citizens will be allowed to know if the candidates are qualified to hold office is to force state legislation that will require ALL candidates to submit a certified copy of a long form, with mom and dad's if necessary.

Of course that will still leave us with the argument of who is a NBC.

Good luck to you, for our nation's sake.

cfkerchner said...

Mario is now ranked #3 and still climbing!

Keep up the good work in getting the word out. Pass the below 'vote for Mario link' along by email and post it in forums with discussion threads by patriots who are concerned about protecting our Constitution.

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)

Joe said...

And don't forget to vote on the show suggestion too!

Mario is on the second page.

jayjay said...

On the Napolitano Guest List, Mario is now up to #3 and the guyy at #2 has already been on the show.

Time to work also on the Show Topic List: