Friday, February 13, 2009

MommaE Radio Rebels BlogTalkRadio 13 Feb 09 - Kerchner v Obama Case Update & Q&A

Hi all,

I am pleased to announce that I and the lead plaintiff, Mr. Charles Kerchner, in the 'Kerchner et al v Obama et al' case, will be on the MommaE Radio Rebels talk radio show tonight, Friday, 13 Feb 2009, from 8:30 to 10:00 p.m. EST. The show is on the network which is broadcast via the internet. I will be providing an overview and update for the case. Mr. Kerchner and I will then take Q&A from the host MommaE and via phone calls from the listening audience. There is also a chat room which the listeners can participate in live while the show is on the air. Feel free to spread this announcement to people interested in this case. I hope to hear from you tonight on the radio show. URL link for this show live tonight or via the archives in the On Demand section. This link will take you straight to the show. Listen to the lead in intro music for about 4 minutes then the talk show starts:

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
185 Gatzmer Avenue
Jamesburg NJ 08831
Email: apuzzo [AT]
TEL: 732-521-1900
FAX: 732-521-3906


Jim said...

Listening now.Glad to hear you aren't relying on the 14th Amendment.Besides the fact of that and other Amendments having questionable ratification,the 14th was authored by Arthur's stooge.And I think Barry knows this can work in his favor if used in any case.Still,the whole system is corrupt.After the Eerie.Penn. case judges were put on notice by FDR a few years later of "judicial silence" in regards to Constitutional cases.The game has worked well until this Usurper issue,and now it will have to be admitted that the Constitution was nullified long ago,or keep ignoring the casees until the economy crashes or a False Flag event takes place,and Martial Law makes this a moot issue.The APA Act of 1946 further destroyed "standing" for all of us.That's why "jurisdiction" is becoming the new excuse to dismiss cases.All this goes back to 1871.

Jim said...

I heard one of you mention the need for historians and Constitutional scholars.I know one historian that has tried diligently to help Berg,and each time Berg blows him off on radio shows.His name is A.Ralph Epperson.He's written on the NWO and hisory for forty years. He's explained hook clauses in the Constitution and the that ties into our crisis and lack of "standing" and "jurisdiction". As for Con.scholars,it's amazing they are silent or just writing articles like Edwin Vieira.And I think they are baffled at the total conspiratorial nature of this Usurper issue.Our security agencies surely have vetted Barry and are covering for him.Most elected officials,at least in DC are Globalists,and know this was done by design.Ron Paul admitted to Alan Stang 2 weeks ago that nothing will be done in the courts over this,and he's not risking his career by speaking out,so he's sticking to his Fed.Reserve battle.Historians like Epperson can do far more on strategy than Con.scholars because they have documented the shift from a Con.Republic to a corp USA mob rule democracy.A researcher that has done excellent research on Barry is Don Nicoloff.He'd help you out along with fellow researcher Dr.K. Read his "Three Stooges Go To Washington" series.

Jim said...

Hope you don't run out of time.Yesterday was Black Friday for this nation.The latest scam in DC was the final nail in the coffin..Australia.To [Australia's national website]
What was discussed at a closed session of the U.S. House of Representatives?

Tuesday March 25, 2008 7:37pm EST

BRISBANE, Australia - The House has held a closed session for the first time in 25 years and apparently discussed a hotly contested surveillance bill.

Republicans had requested privacy for what they termed "an honest debate" on the new Democratic eavesdropping measure.

Conspiracy theorists around the world have filled many pages of blogs and emails with theories as to why the public was prevented to hear what their elected representatives said and heard.

That is the nature of secrets: those "kept in the dark" want to know and in the absence of knowledge, seek answers.

Writers suggested that the special closed session of the U.S. House of Representatives discussed a lot more than the pending security surveillance provisions.

Last week's session was only the fourth time in 176 years that Congress has closed it's doors to the public.

Word has begun leaking from last weeks special, closed-door session of the United States House of Representatives.

Theorists wrote "Not only did members discuss new surveillance provisions as was the publicly stated reason for the closed door session, they also discussed: The imminent collapse of the U.S. economy to occur by September 2008, the imminent collapse of US federal government finances by February 2009, the possibility of Civil War inside the USA as a result of the collapse and advance round-ups of "insurgent U.S. citizens" likely to move against the government.

Also theorised was the detention of those rounded-up at "REX 84" camps constructed throughout the USA and the possibility of retaliation against members of Congress for the collapses and the location of "safe facilities" for members of Congress and their families to reside during expected massive civil unrest

Other answers included "the necessary and unavoidable merger of the United States with Canada" (for its natural resources) and with Mexico (for its cheap labor pool), the issuance of a new currency - THE AMERO - for all three nations as the proposed solution to the coming economic armageddon.

Members of Congress were FORBIDDEN to reveal what was discussed and ABC News via WCPO web site at the link below CONFIRMS congress members were FORBIDDEN to talk about it!

Several are so furious and concerned about the future of the country, they have begun leaking info. Also,reported in Financial Sense article---- part of article here:
by Clif Droke
May 19, 2008

A rumor is swirling around the Internet that an inglorious end to the U.S. economy is imminent. Unlike previous rumors to this effect, this one carries the weight of recent events in the financial realm and has many believing the rumor will come to pass.

Let’s examine some of the claims being made: On March 18, 2008, a “closed door” session of Congress was held for only the fourth time in history. According to House Rule XVII, clause 9, it is forbidden for members of the U.S. House of Representatives to reveal the discussions held behind those doors. The penalty for leaking such information includes loss of seniority, fines, reprimand, censure or expulsion. According to news sources, one purpose of the meetings was to discuss new surveillance techniques to be used by U.S. Homeland Security. Rumors continue to swirl as to what the other topics of discussion took place in that meeting.

According to the Australia.TO newspaper, as reported in the May 2008 Last Trumpet Newsletter (LTM), several congressmen were so incensed about what was discussed behind those doors that they were compelled to leak the contents of the meeting. Following is what is rumored to have been discussed: Imminent collapse of the U.S. economy by September 2008; imminent collapse of the U.S. Government finances by February 2009; possibility of civil war within the U.S. resulting from the collapse; detainment of “insurgent U.S. citizens” in anticipation of their moving against the government; the potential for violent action taken by citizens against members of Congress due to the collapses; the merger of the U.S. economy with those of Canada and Mexico as a solution to the collapse; the introduction of a new tri-national currency called the “AMERO” as another economic solution. And the LTN report of it here: MAY 2008

On the 13th day of March 2008, a rare "closed door" session was held by the United States House of Representatives. It was only the fourth time in the history of the United States that the House of Representatives closed the doors and met in absolute secrecy. Thus, those who were elected to represent the people of the United States would not allow the people to know what they were meeting about. Furthermore, House Rule XVII, clause 9, forbids the Representatives from revealing what was discussed. The penalty for leaking such information includes loss of seniority, fine, reprimand, censure, or expulsion! What went on behind those closed doors where every member was sworn to absolute secrecy, to always conceal and never reveal? We know that the only reason for secrecy is to hide evil. The news media said almost nothing about the secret conclave, but it was mentioned only that one of the items being discussed was the new surveillance techniques that are going to used by the U.S. Government to watch every American. (19)

After diligently searching for more information, I finally found what I was looking for in an Australian newspaper. The story appeared in Australia.TO from Brisbane, Australia. The article stated that ABC News via WCPO confirmed that Congress members were forbidden to talk about what went on in their secret meeting. Several of the Representatives, however, were so furious and concerned about the future of the country that they began leaking info. Here are some of the things that were reportedly leaked out regarding the secret meeting: Discussion regarding the imminent collapse of the U.S. economy to occur by September 2008 - The imminent collapse of the U.S. Government finances by February 2009 - The possibility of Civil War inside the United States as a result of the collapse - The advance round-ups of "insurgent U.S. citizens" likely to move against the government - The detention of those rounded up at REX 84 camps constructed throughout the United States - The possibility of public retaliation against members of Congress for the collapses - The location of safe facilities for members of Congress and their families to reside during massive civil unrest - the necessary and unavoidable merger of the United States with Canada and Mexico - The issuance of a new currency called the AMERO for all three nations as an economic solution. (20) Obviously, there is no documentary proof for the above as the meetings were secret. The information, however, does fit the profile of what is going on around us. Our Almighty Saviour is ultimately in charge. Time will tell if these things are so, and time is running out! NOTE: 2-14-09 1.The economy did collapse in Sept.2008,and to prevent chaos a "Bailout" of $750billion dollars was forced on Congress under threat of Martial Law and was passed.It has failed and it is a projected $8.5 Trillion Bailout to date.The people flooded their Reps with calls in opposition 1,000 to 1 against it,but it was passed.2.On Feb.13th,2009,a "stimulus" package of $787.5 Billion was passed without one person reading it.This confirms the 2nd part of the leaked information above regarding bankruptcy of the government.At this date,regardless of what transpires in the next few months,it is clear that the information leaked about that Closed Door Senate Session was and is true.Since last September,2008 articles regarding a New World Order and possible civil war and Martial Law in the USA are now in the mainstream media.Already,we are seeing riots across the globe against governments that are collapsing and experiencing the same tyrannical abuse of its people as is taking place here.There is open talk of the NAU and Amero now.There's also open talk of a coming "generated crisis" in the USA before June 2009.Over 20 States in the USA are trying to pass laws on state sovereignty to protect its rights against the Federal government when Martial Law takes place.Gun sales have gone through the roof in the past six months.It appears that the Illuminati is going to crush the US economy and thus the world's stock markets to bring in the cashless society and NWO.How many transitional phases will take place is anyone's guess.But the goal appears to be 2012.
Gort...aka messenger

mtngoat61 said...

Hi all,

If you have not seen this 10 minute educational video about "The American Form of Government", you may wish to watch it. It is very good and well produced.

The American Form of Government:

M Publius Goat

Unknown said...

The Commons Sense Test:

What would have happened in the early days of the United States if President George Washington were succeeded along the presidential line by a hypothetical son of Major-General William Howe who commanded the British forces in the Battle of Bunker Hill and a hypothetical American citizen mother?

After the hundreds of thousands of lives lost in the American Revolution, do you think that the American Constitution would have considered the aforementioned hypothetical son of General Howe and his hypothetical American wife a Natural Born Citizen?

This is a good way to portray Barack Obama II’s citizenship being born to a British father and an American mother, regardless of whether he was born in Hawaii or Kenya.

ubi re vera said...

Mr. Apuzzo, I hope you will have time to respond to these questions.

According to your comments, you stated that anyone has the right to run for office but it is Congress's job to qualify the president-elect. Is it unconstitutional for states to ask candidates to verify their eligibility in any way in order to be on the ballot in the first place?

It seems that you primarily base your questions about BO's birth certificate on error by the issuers. Do you have evidence that these types of errors commonly took place at that time or is there precedent for this as a reason to demand an original birth certificate?
Do you know for sure what the filing date on the COLB refers to?

As to your equal protection argument I would just like to comment that I faxed the majority and minority offices of the Sen judiciary committee and the individual members of the specific subcommittee concerning some of the fallacies of resolution 511 and asking them to revisit the issue (at some point prior to the inauguration). No response.


mtngoat61 said...

Hi Janet/Ubi,

I saw your question to Atty Apuzzo. Let me take the liberty to provide you with some information as to how lax the Hawaiian birth registration system was in the 60s and before. Anyone who desired a Hawaiian birth certificate, foreigner or otherwise, could get a birth certificate issued for them as being born in Hawaii. All that was needed was for someone to swear the person was born there with no independent verification, investigation, or confirmation required, and the state would issue the person a birth certificate, no matter where the person really was born.

Here is an example of a Chinese native, one of the founders of the Republic of China, who was born in China getting a Hawaiian birth certificate for his deceptive personal uses and devices in China.

The wide open and total laxness of the Hawaiian birth registration laws and just this one example is the reason why it is critically essential to see the actual original document(s) on file in the vaults in Hawaii and have them examined by independent expert document examiners. Given that Obama has been so extremely reluctant to release those original, long-form, birth registration documents, and any other documents about his life such as his Occidental College records, is all the more reason to get access to them. He is hiding something extremely damaging to his self-proclaimed U.S. citizenship. This is a matter of our national security to be sure the person sitting in the Oval Office and Commander in Chief of our military is a constitutional standards Article II natural born citizen, and/or to determine whether he is even a citizen of the U.S. at all. The future of our nation, our constitution, and our national security depends on this.

M Publius Goat

Mario Apuzzo, Esq. said...


The "MommaE Radio Show" thread is now closed. I have started a new thread, Discussion3, to continue the discussions of the Kerchner v Obama case. Please post your comments and questions about this case and continuation of these discussions at the new post. I will post replies to any still unanswered questions and comments you posted in this thread in that new thread. But please do not post any more new comments or questions here. Click below to go directly to the new discussion thread (#3) for the Kerchner v. Obama case.

Thank you,
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.