Saturday, November 14, 2009

Kerchner v Obama & Congress - U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals - Philadelphia PA - Docket Report - Docket# 09-4209

Kerchner v Obama & Congress - U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals - Philadelphia PA - Docket Report - Docket# 09-4209

http://www.scribd.com/doc/22556305/Kerchner-v-Obama-U-S-3rd-Circuit-Court-of-Appeals-Philadelphia-PA-Docket-09-4209


Charles Kerchner, CDR USNR (Ret)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/ ... help the cause: http://www.protectourliberty.org/
###

6 comments:

jayjay said...

Mario:

Keeping in mind the obviously intentional grossly long delays by the judge in the District Court hearing, it there any way to expedite the Appeal hearing and/or get the case to SCOTUS more quickly??

The longer it takes, the more damage is being done to our country.

jayjay said...

In fact it is good to see the case progressing along the path to SCOTUS and it will be notable once it gets there.

This will truly be a historic case of First Impression on the term of art "natural born citizen" and I believe that it will be recognized as such. Perhaps, even, SCOTUS may use it as the rightful lever to revisit Wong Kim Ark.

ninbit said...

what you think about this? How does it affect Kerchner v Obama & Congress?

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals went the extra step today and issued a Precedential Opinion in Berg v. Obama, with its Order affirming the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania’s decision to dismiss. Philip Berg, whose financial situation has been in disarray for a while now, is ordered to pay costs. He is not out of options: He still can apply for a rehearing in the same court or for a writ from the Supreme Court.

Whatever he decides to do, a Precedential Opinion is serious business. Within the Third Circuit, which consists of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and the Virgin Islands, all lower courts are now obligated to find that voters do not have standing to challenge Obama’s eligibility.

Puzo1 said...

ninbit,

Each case stands or falls on its own facts and applicable law that is argued in the case.

squinlivan said...

Mario,

Where do you go from here....STAHDING is the monster hurdle.....how or what argument will get this circuit to return this case to the district court?

Enjoyed every word of your position re: quo warranto jurisdiction...BUT that is not te problem at hand....

Neither you or Leo stand a chance to even try to secure Justice, unless and until you get standing....and apparently not one of the 30 previous suits even leads anyone to believe that any person or group will be given standing......

Its no wonder people are calling for the same action that the founders took so long ago....when justice could not be had in the Kings courts....they took their own course of action.....

political question my axx, its a question they want nothing to do with....

well when they came I didn't care because I wasn't jewish....it was my neoghbor they were after.....

so who's next????

AMERICAN ADVOCATE said...

SENORE MARIO APUZZO , YOU REALLY ARE THE MOUTH OF TRUTH, AND " WE THE PEOPLE " APPRECIATE YOUR EFFORTS TO RESTORE OUR COSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN WAY . IT IS UN - IMAGINABLE THAT THIS WOULD HAPPEN IN AMERICA , AND THERE ARE MANY PEOPLE TO BLAME BESIDES BARRY SOETORO , ALL OF WHOM SHOULD BE INDICTED , PROSECUTED, AND IMPRISONED.WE WILL KEEP OUR EYES OPEN AND HOPE THAT YOU WILL BE THE SAVIOR OF OUR COUNTRY .

MILLE GRAZIE MIO SENORE , E UN SENOR DI QUALITA .

CARL TAPP