Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Sean & Frank Radio Show of Baltimore MD at 8:35 a.m. EDT Thursday 18 June 2009

I will be on the "Sean & Frank" radio show with Talk Radio 680 WCBM of Baltimore MD at 8:35 a.m. during the morning commute time slot on Thursday, 18 June 2009 to discuss the recent activity and order from the court in the Kerchner et al vs Obama & Congress et al lawsuit. "Start off your day the right way" and listen in. For more details on the show see: .

Listen to a replay of the interview here: Click Here to Listen

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

P.S. Also, please feel free to join the discussions and comments in this forum about the subject of the Natural Born Citizenship clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution by [Clicking Here]. ####


jayjay said...

Look forward to the broadcast ...

Also - Thanks for posting the non-party letters from Kerchner etal v Obama etal.

It's good to see that some of us everyday citizens are letting the Judicial Brabch know that this a very-much-alive issue.

James said...

With all the people you interview with, is there any means of contacting Hannity, Rush, or Beck directly.

The day Hannity puts on his show, is the day Obama is finished.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq. said...


The lead plaintiff and I have repeatedly tried to contact Beck, Hannity, O'Reilly, and Rush and the other key conservative talk show hosts many times. We try at least weekly. Thus far they are not speaking out about the eligibility issue. We keep trying. You and others should keep trying to get through to them too.

James said...

You have to try to get with an inside man who will give you an audience with them. Also remember that Rush, Hannity, Beck and others don't exist in a vacuum. With some insider investigative work, it may possible to track them down and seek an audience with them.

Have you ever thought about going to the Fox Studio in New York. It probably is not to far way from New Jersey. Maybe you might be able to get somewhere.

With alot of time waiting on the response and court's decision on your case, you can use this time to seek out and exploit the media.

Teo Bear said...

James, you wrote, "With alot of time waiting on the response and court's decision on your case, you can use this time to seek out and exploit the media."

Do you have any idea how much time they have just waiting for the Judges orders to run around trying to get an audience to someone who doesn't want to hear them?

Do you realize that Mario is doing this pro-bono, and trying to maintain a law practice and living for his family? Or do you know that Kerchner has been funding the expenses for this from his navy retirement check? You must know that neither has asked the public for one penny to keep financing this. How about cutting them a little slack!

If you want them to appear on national TV and radio then you go and talk to Rush, Hannety and Beck. You can tell them Shep Smith sent you, but don't know how good that will be.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq. said...


Thanks for your suggestion. We have tried to get on as many radio stations as possible. We believe it is important to educate the public on this critical issue with which our nation is now faced. As our case progresses through the Court, I am sure that there will be many more stations that will want to know more about this case.

Also, we have no down time, even when waiting for the court. We are actively working on this case every day. We have countless patriots contributing to this effort and they are working day and night, everyday. We are thankful for all the help that we get. We will keep up the good fight and wait to get an audience with the Court.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

Heaven Pamella said...


I spent several hours reading over your submitted court documents re: the Criminal Usurper Soetoro/Obama et al v Kerchner et al.

Mario, I am 100% impressed with your 100% Perfect, Excellent, EXTREMELY STRONG, & 100% Faithful & 100% True pleadings in Kerchner et al v Obama et al.

Mario, I will never be able to say thank you enough for all of your hard work you are doing for all Americans and all people in the world. Barry Soetoro AKA Barack Hussein Obama is a CONSTANT LIAR & THE WORST SERIAL CRIMINAL who has ever come into America & he MUST legally be removed from our White House, for America to continue to exist in complete truth.

Soetoro/Obama is right in front of our eyes trying to complete his coup attempt & takeover of America for the foreign nations he works for. Soetoro/Obama is a Radical Islamic Muslim and a Radical Socialist/Communist who wants to install himself as a Dictator for Life in America for the different nations & different groups of people whom Soetoro/Obama is WORKING FOR and WORKING WITH 24/7/365!!

Mario, Soetoro/Obama's goals are to destroy America as we know it. Congress MUST start Congressional Hearings on Soetoro/Obama now as Soetoro/Obama is a DOMESTIC ENEMY attacking America & ALL Americans from within!! Mario, unless Soetoro/Obama gets legally removed out of office in America, the USA will cease to exist within a short time & this is Obama's goal.

Mario, I will be listening to you on the radio while I am at work today. Mario, I 100% stand with you & I 100% thank you for your EXTREMELY PERFECT AND YOUR EXTREMELY STRONG EFFORTS at trying to gain legal control back of America for the the 100% FAITHFUL & TRUE AMERICAN CITIZENS who are in America legally & for ALL of our children and grandchildren before Obama finishs destroying our country America and AALL OF US!!

Mario is it well known in KENYA and in other nations that Soetoro/Obama was born in KENYA and is now an illegal alien who is illegally sitting in our White House today!! Wake up Americans!! Every sing thing Soetoro/Obama signs is illegal and null & void Americans!! MARIO, WE MUST DEMAND CONGRESS START HOLDING CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS ON SOETORO/OBAMA IMMEDIATELY TODAY BECAUSE SOETORO/OBAMA IS TRULY A CRIMINAL USURPER & A SERIAL CRIMINAL THAT WE AMERICANS MUST HOLD POINT BY POINT ACOUNTABLE FOR EVERY WORD AND EVERY DEED OBAMA IS SAYING & DOING IN OUR AMERICA!!



James said...

I listened to your interview this morning. You are 100% correct. Your argument is just simple common sense. Although we have had presidents who born off US Soil, every president has always been a 2nd Generation American (1st Generation Naturalized or Natural Born). Obama represents a an unprecedented condition since he is a Hybrid - American/Kenyan.

I think the Fathers wanted an American/American as our POTUS.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq. said...


I think you misunderstood the conversation on the radio show. I did not say "we have had presidents who born off US soil". Quite the opposite. All our presidents, after the original citizens, were born on U.S. soil to two U.S. citizens (except for the recently revealed Arthur who got to the office due to the assassination of Garfield deception and lies by Arthur). You need both parts. Birth on the soil of the USA and birth to parents who are both citizens when you are born. To be a "natural born citizen" the person must be born in the country to parents who are both citizens of the country. Here is a link to one my essays on the subject:

Anonymous said...

Surat Edaran Menkumham No.M.09-IZ.03.01
due to case of Manohara Pinot v Kelantan prince, I wondered why Obama sent the FBI to help her while she under the newest law of immigration UU no.12 Tahun 2006 had dual nationality. For you Mr Puzo, before fight Obama translate that newest bill although cannot being used to hide his past for Indonesia don't acknowledge retroactive principle (for that the impunity for those organizer rapist of my country men during may riot 1998 can run as president and vice presidentstill runs and best of all all of them knew about obama is an Indonesian) he will used the upper principle of Immigration facilities for the Children under 18 years old when UU no 12 Tahun 2006 is applied, to run away from you. Look and learn carefully. This all I can do for thee.

Anonymous said...

look upon google then translate this one, Surat Edaran Menkumham No.M.09-IZ.03.01 about permit for children under 18 years old to had dual nationality under the newest law of Indonesia immigration law. Though cannot canceled what had being decided under UU no 62 Tahun 1958 (non retroactive principle ) but still Obama can used this to escape from you. Translate this one.

mtngoat61 said...

Hi James: Does the following make it clearer to you. Goat

Natural Born Citizen defined - Universal Truth & Natural Law

To be a natural born citizen one has to be born in the country to parents who are both citizens of the country -- natural law codified by Vattel in his 1758 legal treatise, The Law of Nations. Natural law is based on widely and internationally accepted universal truths.

Being born in the USA is a necessary component but Not Sufficient by itself.

Having two parents who are Citizen of the USA when the child is born is a necessary component but Not Sufficient by itself.

Being born in the country to parents who are both citizens of the country is the only state of nature and facts which meets the universal truth of being a natural born citizen of the country at birth.

Being born in the country to parents who are both citizens of the country is the "universal truth" and Law of Nations definition of the historical meaning of the legal term of art "natural born citizen" when the framers inserted it into the Constitution in Article II as part of the minimum eligibility requirements for the office of President & Commander-in-Chief. For the other branches of the new federal government being a simple Citizen was sufficient. But for the singular most powerful office in our new federal government, the framers wanted the person holding that office to have deeper roots in the country than required for Senators and House members ... by requiring the child's both parents to have allegiance only to the USA via those parents having been born here or being naturalized in the USA if they were immigrants ... AND .... that the child of theirs had to be physically born in the USA in order that the child could someday become the President & Commander-in-Chief. In order words the child has to be a 2nd generation American via both parents. This is the only way under "natural law" and the "universal truths" innate in that natural law, that the person in the office will have sole allegiance at birth and no claim on him at birth by any foreign power. A child born in that state of nature, in the country to parents who are both citizens of the country, meets the "universal truth" test and "natural law" as having only one country and one allegiance and no divided loyalties at birth. That is what the country's founders and framers intended for all future Presidents of the USA after their founding generation which fought to create the new Republic was gone from this earth.

Universal truths were self evident to our founders and framers. Only now has the progressive movement slowly been changing the meaning of words and universal truths of natural law passed down over the millenniums since time immemorial.

M Publius Goat

roderick said...

does anyone know the latest on Schneller vs. Cortes? It was scheduled for SCOTUS conferencing on June 18.

James said...


Are you going to be on Mommae Tonight at 8:30 PM.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq. said...

Hi James,

Yes, there is a show announcement in the blog, about 3rd down from the top post. But for your convenience, here is a direct link to that announcement:

cfkerchner said...

My email 6/19 to Glenn Beck:

I just finished reading your new book, Common Sense. You are correct. There is something very wrong in America. There’s a suppressed under-current of frustration and great distrust in our current government like we've never seen before.

And I know what it is. Both political parties and Congress betrayed the Constitution in the last election. The 800# gorilla in the room is that no one, including you, is willing to openly talk in the national media about the trampling of Article II of our Constitution, that is, the Obama eligibility issue under Article II of our Constitution to constitutional standards.

Obama has totally, cleverly ignored it with progressive changing the meaning of historic legal terms of art in that document. As you wrote they changed the meaning of "public use" to "public benefit". Now Obama wants the legal term of art "natural born citizen" the same meaning as "citizen at birth" or "native born citizen".

People want to talk about this issue. It needs to be discussed and fully aired to a national audience and not with the ridicule it is given on MSNBC. Obama has no respect for our Constitution and wants to destroy it or severely limit its power. He could be a Fascist in grooming.

If you start talking about the eligibility issue, people will rally to you to learn more. Explore the historical intent and meaning of the term "natural born citizen" in Article II of our Constitution. The 2 words "natural born" were put there for a reason. They are not synonymous with today's "native born". Study Vattel. He defined the natural born term in 1758. This issue needs to be openly discussed. Article II "natural born citizenship" is not synonymous with 14th Amendment "born" citizenship. Natural born in not mentioned in the 14th Amendment and the 14th Amendment did not change or modify Article II. Read the 1874 Supreme Court Minor v Happersett decision on the meaning of "natural born citizen" of which there is no doubt. Also read the Perkins v Elg decision of 1939 by the Supreme Court. The progressives have tried to change the meaning of Article II to equal the 14th Amendment but they are not the same.

Tonchen Essay

Print out and review this table and the legal references and check them out:
Citizenship Terms

Read these essays:
Article II Natural Born Citizenship

The Birthers

Add the book, "The Law of Nations", by Emmerich Vattel, published originally in 1758 to your reading list. Especially Book/Vol 1 and the chapter therein on citizenship of a nation. Particular chapter 19. This book was used extensively by the founders and framers of our country for inspiration in writing the Declaration of Independence and our Constitution. In fact the quote you cited in the Declaration of Independence, "life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness" is directly from Vattel. Much of the concepts in our Constitution are derived from Vattel and the need for a written constitution as the supreme law of the land. That all came from Vattel. Add it to your reading list, particularly Chapter 19, Section 212.

I agree with you that violence is not the way to resolve it. The solution is to public air the issue and call for hearings in Congress that should have been held last year, just like they did for McCain last year on his citizenship issues, but never did for Obama. I have taken action in a non-violent way in the legal system. I need public support to discuss this more openly. Will you offer it? Here is a link to my lawsuit.


A one page summary of it is attached (linked) as a PDF file:
Washington Times

Congratulations on your book.

Charles Kerchner
CDR USNR Retired
Lead Plaintiff
Kerchner v Obama & Congress

mtngoat61 said...

A proposed narrative to explain the various seemingly conflicting statements made about Obama's birth in Kenya and Hawaii:

Underage U.S. teenager gets pregnant via a significantly older married man from Kenya. An unusual event in 1961.

Mother of teenager is in total shock over the event as would have been many mothers of teenage girls getting pregnant in 1961 and says to her daughter you have ruined your life and will make going to college much harder for yourself and convinces the teenage girl to go to Kenya in the last month of her pregnancy and give up the baby to the Kenyan natural family of the natural father of the child to be raised in Kenya by them.

The Kenyan grandmother of the child attends birth in Kenyan hospital in Mombasa Kenya and is ready to take custody of the child and raise the child for the foot loose and fancy free natural father with multiple wives ... and the U.S. teenage mother is supposed return to Hawaii leaving the child with the natural father's family and restart her life back in Hawaii minus the child ... and go to college. In 1961, pregnant teenage girls giving up children to restart their lives anew was not unusual.

But nature throws the plan a curve ball. Maternal instincts kick in and mother cannot leave the baby in Kenya, either due to pure maternal instincts or in seeing the conditions in Kenya that her child would be raised in with a mostly absentee father over there. Thus she changes her mom's plan and she takes the baby and birth certificate issued by the Mombassa Hospital to the American Embassy or consulate in Kenya and shows them the Kenyan Birth Certificate for her child and "explains" the baby was born unexpectedly in Kenya while there visiting her "husband's" family. U.S. officials then stamp her passport as traveling with an infant child.

Mother gets on plane carrying the child and flies back to Hawaii and appears at the airport arrival with the new baby in tow, much to the shock of her mother, the child's U.S. grandmother. Baby easily is passed through U.S. entry officials due to embassy stamp on mother's passport and the supporting Kenyan birth certificate showing a U.S. citizen is the mother.

Child's U.S. grandmother is still besides herself at this change in plans by the mother of the child. The child's grandmother then knowing or learning from legal advisers how lax Hawaiian birth registration laws were in 1961, then cooks up a plan and scheme with the child's mother, to lie to Hawaiian officials and swear and sign affidavits at the birth registry office that the child was born in Hawaii at home with no witnesses but them, in order to get the child U.S. citizenship (a highly desirable status) to make future travel and life easier on the family and new child. They did this lie and cover up simply to gain U.S. citizenship for the child a highly coveted status for any child, not knowing that this child might someday grow up and try to become the President and thus risk having their whole plans and lies exposed.

Birth registration office then issues the announcements to the two newspapers, as was the offices custom at the time to send the papers lists of babies born, of the birth event which at its source was only based on the false sworn testimony of the mother. Thus the birth notices in the newspapers are not independent data, they all came from the same source, ... false sworn statements from the mother and/or grandmother that the child was born in Hawaii.

Thus under this narrative the birth records in the vaults in Hawaii may be simply sworn affidavits of the mother and grandmother saying Obama was born at home with no witnesses, all based on lies and fraud, which seems to be a common occurrence with Mr. O's entire life.

A suggested narrative to explain events and facts as revealed thus far.