Saturday, March 26, 2011

President Dwight Eisenhower Had to File a Birth Certificate to Run for President - Unlike Obama, Ike had nothing to hide!

Via Sonoran News; - Ike needed birth certificate to run for president - ‘Ike had nothing to hide!’ -

BY LINDA BENTLEY - CAVE CREEK – Glen Fairclough, a reader from Salt Lake City, Utah, sent us an e-mail last week to express his gratitude for publishing the recent article regarding President Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate.

And, while going through digital images online of his hometown newspaper, the Deseret News and Telegram, Fairclough forwarded us a United Press wire article from the Oct. 2, 1952 edition he thought we would find interesting.

The article appeared on page 6A with a dateline of Sherman, Texas. It was headlined: “General’s birth certificate officially filed,” and stated, “A certificate recording Dwight Eisenhower’s birth in Denison on Oct. 14, 1890, was filed Wednesday [Oct. 1, 1952] in the Grayson County Clerk’s office. Read more ...

Read rest of the story via the link and for further information about Ike's proven natural born Citizenship status upon his birth in Texas in Oct 1890 to two U.S.
citizen parents, unlike Obama who claims he was born in Hawaii but whose father was a foreign national and was not even an immigrant to the USA. And also unlike Ike, Obama has relatives, African newspapers, and government officials in Kenya saying he was born there and not in the USA. Ike never had relatives and government officials in foreign countries stating repeatedly that he was born in their country. Thus, the logical justification to ask to see Obama's original long form birth registration documents in Hawaii, and any amendments to same. This is logically needed to verify that he indeed was physically born there and not just had a false birth registration done in Hawaii via sworn affidavit of a birth at home with no independent witnesses and submitted by mail by his maternal grandmother who lived there in order to get U.S. Citizenship for her foreign born grandson. Birth registration fraud was easy in Hawaii in 1961 due to the very lax laws in the new state.

Regardless of the lack of claims of foreign birth about Eisenhower, Ike was still required to file a copy of his birth certificate with controlling legal authorities upon running for election as President. So Whoopi Goldberg, was it racist to ask Ike to file a certified paper copy of his birth certificate with controlling legal authorities in order to run for President. Ike wasn't allowed to just show a picture of it on television. He had to provide a certified paper copy of his birth certificate to the authorities. What is racist about having to prove you are constitutionally eligible to run for President? What is racist about the rule of law of which our U.S. Constitution is the fundamental law of the land. Read more here: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/03/reminder-dwight-d-eisenhower-had-to.html

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####

P.S. If Whoopi Goldberg needs another example of others being asked to show documents and birth certificates to prove they are eligible to run for President, she should read about the challenges made to John McCain's natural born Citizen status in the 2008. John McCain was sued in NH by a man named Hollander charging he was not a natural born Citizen. The Senate Judiciary Committee chaired by Senator Leahy, and of which Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were voting members, investigated McCain in response to citizen requests. He was required to show his paper certified copy of his birth certificate to them in executive session. But for similar requests in much larger numbers calling for the investigation of Obama's eligibility, and with lawsuits filed charging Obama was not eligible, that was all ignored by the Democratic Party lead Senate. That is lack of due process and unequal protection under the law of land and the U.S. Constitution. So Whoopi Goldberg's charges of racism on The View TV show are completely groundless and show her ignorance of history or her willingness to go to the lowest level of politics and debate, and shout and yell and act absurd on air ... and play the race card and call and imply that anyone who questions Obama's eligibility is a racist. See this blog post in late February 2008 and early March 2008 by Professor Jonathan Turley questioning McCain's eligiblity who along with mysteriously simultaneously appearing articles in the New York Times (looks to me like they were started based on orders from Hillary Clinton operatives) started the investigation of John McCain under constitutional grounds which ultimately lead to the Senate investigation and resolution in April 2008: http://jonathanturley.org/2008/03/06/the-supreme-redux-is-john-mccain-ineligible-to-be-president/ and http://jonathanturley.org/2008/02/29/mccains-constitutional-dilemma-native-son-but-not-natural-born/ . And this one: http://birthers.org/misc/FOMB.html
####

14 comments:

Jo said...

A Special Commission must be created in Congress to invistigate fully the constitutional qualification of the pretender. Hundreds of millions of US population will make a plea to their representatives.
To mention some: JFK assasination, 1986 Shuttle explosion, the fact finding commissions were formed.

itooktheredpill said...

You can see the 1952 article yourself online...

First, open the following URL in a new tab or new window:

http://news.google.com/newspapers/p/deseret_news?nid=Aul-kAQHnToC&dat=19521002&printsec=frontpage

Then, scroll right… so that the electronic reader says “Page 4 of 31″, (but the actual newspaper page shown is page 6A).

You will see the article there, headlined: "General’s birth certificate officially filed".

itooktheredpill said...

Exclusive to Newsmax: Donald Trump's Birth Certificate

The gauntlet has been thrown...

Despe666 said...

If you bother to read the article you linked:

“Nobody had bothered to make out a birth certificate when the Republican presidential candidate was born in a house at the corner of Lamar and Day streets in nearby Denison.”

This clearly says that Eisenhower NEVER HAD a birth certificate before running for President. Obama’s COLB states that it was filed on August 8th 1961. Ike’s certificate would have stated that it was filed sometime in 1952.

What was the point of all this again?

Puzo1 said...

Despe666,

So we know Eisenhower's birth story. What is Obama's?

Despe666 said...

All the relevant information is right there on Obama's COLB:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BarackObamaCertificationOfLiveBirthHawaii.jpg

What information did Ike release that is not contained in that COLB?

Puzo1 said...

Despe666,

You have just proven my point. Obama has no birth story. By the way, I do not appreciate circle games.

Despe666 said...

He was born in Honolulu on August 4th at 7:24 PM. His mother is Stanley Ann Dunham and his father is Barack Hussein Obama.

How is that not a birth story? There's a difference between not having a story and choosing not to believe the story.

MichaelN said...

Despe666 said...

All the relevant information is right there on Obama's COLB:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BarackObamaCertificationOfLiveBirthHawaii.jpg

What information did Ike release that is not contained in that COLB?
----------------------------
The 'relevant information' is from a dubious source. ie. the COLB may very well be the result of an "adult or the legal parents" of a child born out of state.

See Hawaiian Revise Statute 338-17.8 where one can plainly see that HDoH issued Hawaiian 'birth certificates' (in this case a COLB with 'Date Filed' as opposed to 'Date Accpted')to people born out of state, based on the word of virtually anyone. without any officially verified supporting evidence or proof.

Obama's COLB merely proves that someone advised HDoH of a birth somewhere.

Puzo1 said...

Despe666,

You said: "He was born in Honolulu on August 4th at 7:24 PM."

That might be what is alleged. But millions of Americans and I have yet to see any real proof of that. And do not tell me that the computer imaged COLB is proof, for that image, in light of the existing contradictory evidence of a birth in Kenya, is not only unofficial but also insufficient in that it does not provide any corroborating evidence of the birth event, like the name of the hospital or delivery doctor or any other birth witness identification. Hence, Obama does not yet have a convincing American birth story.

Despe666 said...

"So we know Eisenhower's birth story. What is Obama's?"

Yet an anecdotal article on page 6 of a newspaper 60 years ago is all the evidence you needed to affirm that you now know Ike's birth story.

Puzo1 said...

Despe666,

You are wrong about that. I have not seen foreign newspapers, public radio stations, foreign government officials, his wife, his family members, birth certificates, and numerous lawsuits declare that Eisenhower was born in or that his home country was a foreign country.

I also did not see that Eisenhower refused to disclose to the public the best birth certificate that he had.

puzo1moderator said...

One of my messages to The Donald today ....

--------------------------
The far left OBOT backing Obama catering media and press are attacking your mother's Scottish home country birth. That is not a valid issue -- she was a naturalized citizen when you were born. They are once again lying and putting out disinformation and half truths to the American electorate. All that is required per the founders and framers intent with the legal term of art "natural born Citizen" in the presidential eligibility clause in our Constitution is that the parents of the child be U.S. Citizens when born AND born in the USA. About 95% of American citizens meet that so it is not a restrictive small class. It is the group who make up the overwhelming vast majority of U.S. Citizens and it is from that group we are supposed to choose our Presidents. The parents can be foreign born as long as the parents were naturalized Citizens when the child is born in the USA. Since your foreign born Scottish mother married a U.S. Citizen in the USA she was automatically naturalized under U.S. law in the 1930s under the legal concept of Citizenship fusion by marriage. The wife automatically by marital fusion law gains the Citizenship of her husband. Thus when you were born in 1946 your were born to two Citizen parents in the USA and you are thus a fully qualified constitutional Article II, Section 1, "natural born Citizen" of the United States.

Now with Obama, Obama has a real problem in that area of the law. Obama's father was not a U.S. Citizen, was not even an immigrant to this country, and was not even a permanent resident. Obama's father was a foreign national (British Subject from the colony of Kenya) sojourning in the USA to attend college in Hawaii and impregnated Obama's mother as a teenager. They never lived together after the pregnancy occurred as man and wife. There was some pseudo marriage declared in his nativity story for which no marriage license has ever been found, and then Obama Sr. abandoned the teenage mother and went off to Harvard and then a few years late back to Kenya with a 2nd American wife in tow as well as rejoining another Kenya wife he left behind in Kenya.

Obama is not eligible to be President and Command of our military no matter where Obama was born since his father was not a U.S. Citizen but was a foreign national who gave Obama British Citizenship and Obama became a British Subject by birth, recognized under U.S., British law (British Nationality Act of 1948), natural law, and international law.

Obama's father was never a U.S. Citizen nor did he ever want to be one. Obama is not eligible for that reason alone although the press will not discuss this constitutional eligibility point either. They hide this point about Obama just like they hide the truth about the Obama birth certificate issue.

See my essays and articles and ads on this subject at:
http://www.protectourliberty.org

and the articles at my lawyers blog:
http://puzo1.blogspot.com

So Mr. Trump ... counter attack the far left press on their false accusations saying you are not eligible to be President since your mother was foreign born. That is B.S. just like the racism charges as to why people are questioning Obama's eligibility ... and the far left media knows it and our playing every question about Obama down and dirty to scare away criticizers. It is the citizenship of the parents that counts when their children are born in the USA, not where the parents themselves were born.

Respectfully,

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lehigh Valley PA
http://www.protectourliberty.org

P.S. Send your messages to The Donald at:
http://shouldtrumprun.com/contact-us/
Also suggest that The Donald meet with Attorney Mario Apuzzo and I.

Mamuka said...

In 1968, George Romney of Michigan ran unsuccessfully for the Republican nomination for President. As I recall, Romney was born in Mexico to US citizen parents (they might have been diplomats). He was forced to provide documentation of his eligibility.