Saturday, March 5, 2011

Obama Uses Race to Avoid Answering Whether He Is a “Natural Born Citizen” and to Divide and Conquer Our Nation to Hold Political Power

Obama Uses Race to Avoid Answering Whether He Is a “Natural Born Citizen” and to Divide and Conquer Our Nation to Hold Political Power

By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
March 5, 2011

Here is an article I just read published @ NewsMax.com, Friday 04 Mar 2011 10:57 PM. Source



"Black Leaders Rip Obama Claim of Tea Party Racism"
Members of the Project 21 black leadership network strongly disagree with President Barack Obama's contention, as reported in the new book "Family of Freedom: Presidents and African-Americans in the White House," that the tea parties are motivated more by the color of Obama's skin than the content of his agenda.

"As a keynote speaker at numerous tea party events around the country which has allowed me to meet tea party activists from all walks of life, I know it is Obama's progressive politics and not his race that motivates these patriotic Americans to protest our nation's slide toward socialism," said full-time Project 21 Fellow Deneen Borelli. "By engaging in race-card politics, Obama shows he is willing to follow the lead of Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson to ignite racial tension as a means of maintaining power and furthering his agenda."

In "Family of Freedom," by Kenneth T. Walsh, it is written that Obama, responding to a private dinner guest in May 2010, agreed there is a "subterranean agenda" in the opposition to his presidency that is rooted in race.

Project 21's Borelli added: "By stooping to this level, Obama is discrediting his position as our nation's leader."

"Repeating the discredited assumption that race rules the tea parties is the action of a scoundrel and not befitting of a president," said Project 21 Chairman Mychal Massie. "For him to wallow in the gutter with charlatans who spurn honest debate for scurrilous name-calling is demeaning to all Americans and sends the wrong signal to all those who aspire to free and open political debate. With so much of the world embracing open discourse, it is a shame our President seemingly wants to cling to the discredited tactics that offended so many abroad."

On Feb. 28, Massie engaged in an "empty chair debate" at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., to refute similar allegations about the tea party movement and race made by establishment civil rights lobbyists Al Sharpton, Marc Morial and Walter Fauntroy.

Project 21, a leading voice of black conservatives since 1992, is sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research

© All Rights Reserved
NewsMax.com

*****************

There are two steps to power, gaining it and maintaining it.

As we can see from such demagogic statements, Obama is really desperate to maintain power. If he can make such reckless statements in order to keep power, we have to ask ourselves what else would he do to keep it?

If a "white" President ever played the race card and made such unfounded racial statements about some political opposition group, he would be asked to resign.

We have also seen Obama and his supporters using race as a means by which they seek to avoid having to show that Obama was born in Hawaii and that he is an Article II “natural born Citizen.” Not once have we seen Obama come out publicly and say that race should play no role in the question of where he was born and whether he is an Article II “natural born Citizen.” Instead, Obama just sits back and watches American race relations go down the gutter. It appears as though he just relishes in all the racial hate speech that has infected our public discourse and is dividing our nation.

Is Obama’s plan to divide our powerful nation so he can maintain power over her? Maybe Obama has been reading how Caesar used “divide et impera” to conquer people and control them. For those who want to read more about the concept of divide and conquer, I recommend reading the interesting Wikipedia article at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divide_and_rule .

It is time for Obama to resign, for attempting to use race as a means to divide our nation and thereby hold on to political power, for using race as a means to avoid having to answer to the people on whether he is an Article II "natural born Citizen," and for not being an Article II “natural born Citizen.” If he is not willing to resign, then Congress has to take appropriate action against him to protect the American people. If Congress is not willing to do it, then it is up to the States to do so. Failure to take action against Obama will only weaken America and our allies.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
March 5, 2011
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
####

Copyright © 2011
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
All Rights Reserved

5 comments:

Doublee said...

I comment frequently on articles on my local newspaper's web site.

Whenever I make a comment critical of Obama, invariably there will be many who accuse me of being racist.

It is really sad that people resort to this level of discourse. It only tells me that they have nothing really worthwhile to say.

The Stacker said...

The O'Reilly canned response is SO nauseating. Whenever he mentions the "birthers" or Obama's birth issue(s) he says, "We checked it out." He insinuates with that statement "believe me, he is legit."

The sad thing is that NO ONE calls him on how he actually checked it out. He never says what that means. Going back to when he and Megyn Kelly had a conversation on it on his show, he gave the standard newspaper announcement line, which is meaningless to anyone that is a critical thinker.

It MUST be outed that the Obama camp has lied about the Kapi'olani birth. The funny thing that I've always mentioned as well is that no one has ever confirmed it, neither Obama himself, Gibbs, or his camp. The electronic form letter to Kapi'olani were never confirmed. So technically he hasn't lied. But someone in his camp has ...

It's pretty obvious at this point, Mario and Charles, that Obama has a delayed birth certificate, possibly delayed until the mid 2000s (2006-7?) and that for all that time (or still) it was never "accepted" as legit.

If that's the case, could he still be considered an NBC, even under the most flexible criteria?

I also think the guardians listed are damning to the story.

Think about this, page 345 from Dreams: "Unlike mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was. So of all of the Old Man's kids, Mark's claim is the only one that is uncontested."

He told us in DREAMS that the birth story is unreliable and, at minimum, he cannot LEGALLY prove that he is a true inheritor to Barack Sr.'s estate!

Think of it!

cpanon said...

There is a necessary and sufficient axiom in any discussion asserting racism: The first party to assert racism is only party that is racist.

Why cant we frame similar axiomatic assertions/hypothesis and force them to be addressed or consequences inflicted?

Of course I am making a application of Aristotle's Law of Non-contradiction, the raison detre of Law or any system asserting legitimacy to adduce universal truth.

MichaelN said...

Time to let the judiciary, the legal fraternity and the people who depended on their diligence to get it right, but got & get it wrong.

The Wong Kim Ark case is probably where things went astray when Chief Justice of SCOTUS failed to mention the following statement by Lord Coke in Calvin's case that held sanguinis as essential to natural born.

Coke – Calvin’s case

“that issue is no subject to the King of England, though he be born upon his soyl, and under his meridian, for that he was not born under the ligeance of a subject,”

The reason the father is not a subject is completely irrelevant, it is because the parent father is not a subject that the child is not a NBS.

Sanguinis is essential to being a NBS.

http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=911&chapter=106337&layout=html&Itemid=27

Spread the word & send this to the legal advisers who develop the state electoral statutes.

Ask them to get a judicial interpretation of this statement by Coke.

MichaelN said...

A discussion with some 'legal experts'

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2011/03/calvins-case/#comment-95706