Monday, February 21, 2011

Ad - Obama Ineligible! 21 Feb 2011 Issue Washington Times National Weekly Edition - page 5

Ad - Obama Ineligible! 21 Feb 2011 issue Washington Times National Weekly edition - page 5.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/49213761/Obama-Ineligible-21-Feb-2011-Washington-Times-National-Weekly-edition-pg-5

Citizen maybe, but NOT a "natural born Citizen" of the United States.

Obama is not Article II constitutionally eligible to be the President and Commander of our military. Obama is NOT a "natural born Citizen" to constitutional standards. Obama's father was NOT a U.S. Citizen. Obama's father was not an immigrant to the United States. Obama's father was a foreign national, a British Subject. Obama is the child of an alien father who was sojourning in the U.S. attending college. Obama was born a British Subject via his father and is still such to this day. Obama has never conclusively proved he was born in Hawaii. Obama's paternal family in Kenya, Kenyan government officials, and newspapers in Kenya say he was born in Kenya. Obama's maternal grandmother likely falsely and illegally registered him as born in Hawaii to get him, her new foreign-born grandson, U.S. Citizenship.

History shows us that a popularly elected, but ineligible, chief executive in the executive branch of a government can be legally and constitutionally removed from office, e.g., Governor Thomas H. Moodie of North Dakota was a prime example. After he was sworn in and serving as Governor, the North Dakota State Supreme Court ordered Governor Moodie removed from office, after it was determined that he was constitutionally and legally ineligible to serve in the office to which he was popularly elected. http://history.nd.gov/exhibits/governors/governors19.html

Also, two U.S. Senators although popularly elected and sworn in to the U.S. Senate were subsequently removed from office after it was learned that they were NOT constitutionally eligible when they were elected.
Albert Gallatin [U.S. Senator seating unconstitutional and annulled]:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Gallatin
James Shields [U.S. Senator seating unconstitutional and annulled]:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Shields

Thus it is very clear that winning a popular election does not trump or nullify the constitution of a state or the U.S. federal constitution. Obama is not constitutionally eligible to be the President and Commander in Chief of the military and should be removed from office and his election, confirmation, and swearing in annulled.

Charles F. Kerchner, Jr.
CDR USNR (Retired)
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####

13 comments:

Dixhistory said...

Charles, I wish this was put on Cable news, over the air TV and in every news print media in the United States.

Every citizen needs to read this and understand what it really means to them and their children.

DixHistory

8by8 said...

February 22, 2011 at 1:54 AM

http://tinyurl.com/62olp4z

Interesting 1904 book that was received by the Harvard Law Library in 1925: Judicial and statutory definitions of words and phrases, Volume 2 By West Publishing Company....“Females and infants do not personally possess those rights and privileges In any state In the Union, but they are generally dependent upon adult males, through whom they enjoy the benefits of those rights and privileges; and It is a rule of common law, as well as of common sense, that females and Infants should in this respect partake of the quality of those adult males who belong to the same class and condition in society, and, of course, they will or will not be citizens as the adult males of the same class are or are not so. Nor do we mean to say that It Is necessary even for an adult male, to be a citizen, that he should be In the actual enjoyment of all those rights and privileges; but he may even not possess those qualifications of property, of age, or of residence which most of the states prescribe as requisites to the enjoyment of some of their highest privileges and Immunities, and yet be a citizen. But to be a citizen It is necessary that he should be entitled to the enjoyment of those privileges and immunities upon the same terms upon which they are conferred upon other citizens, and, unless he is so entitled, he cannot, in the proper sense of the term, be a ‘citizen.’ In England, birth in the country was alone sufficient to make any one a subject Even a villein or a slave born within the King’s allegiance is according to the principles of the common law a subject, but it never can be admitted that he is a citizen. One may, no doubt, be a citizen by birth as well as a subject, but subject and citizen are evidently words of different import, and it indisputably requires something more to make a citizen than it does to make a subject. It is, in fact, not the place of a man’s birth, but the rights and privileges he may be entitled to enjoy, which make him a citizen.

Now going further into the statutory definitions, we find this with reference to a S.C. court case:

A “denizen” is in a middle state between an alien and a natural-born citizen, and although subject to some of the disabilities of the former, is entitled to many of the privileges of the latter. He may take lands by purchase or devise, which an alien may not, but cannot take by inheritance; for his parent through whom he must claim, being an alien, has no inheritable blood, and therefore could convey none to the child. From a like defect of hereditary blood the issue of a denizen born before denizenation cannot inherit from him, but his issue born after may. McClenaghan v. McClenagban (S. C.) 1 Strob. Eq. 295, 319, 47 Am. Dec 632.

Which all makes sense why Virginia adopted this in 1779:

Bill Declaring Who Shall Be Deemed Citizens of This Commonwealth May 1779

Be it enacted by the General Assembly, that all white persons born within the territory of this commonwealth and all who have resided therein two years next before the passing of this act, and all who shall hereafter migrate into the same; and shall before any court of record give satisfactory proof by their own oath or affirmation, that they intend to reside therein, and moreover shall give assurance of fidelity to the commonwealth; and all infants wheresoever born, whose father, if living, or otherwise, whose mother was, a citizen at the time of their birth, or who migrate hither, their father, if living, or otherwise their mother becoming a citizen, or who migrate hither without father or mother, shall be deemed citizens of this commonwealth, until they relinquish that character in manner as herein after expressed: And all others not being citizens of any the United States of America, shall be deemed aliens.

It was all in keeping with English common law as acknowledged in “Judicial and statutory definitions of words and phrases – Harvard Law Library Jan 13, 1925″

http://tinyurl.com/6xfb7l8

pixelpatriot said...

A Find of a Lifetime: Jefferson Books Quest Ends at Washington University

February 21, 2011
by Endrina Tay
Posted in: By Ann Lucas Birle and Endrina Tay

“Last week, we had the privilege of being the first Monticello staff to set eyes on the more than 70 Jefferson books that we recently discovered at Washington University in St. Louis (WUSTL). We flew to St. Louis early on Valentine’s Day on February 14 to see firsthand the volumes Jefferson once owned in his library at Monticello during his retirement.”

“Our trip was the culmination of three months of intense and thrilling detective work done in cooperation with Erin Davis, Curator of Rare Books at WUSTL.”

“A tiny scrap of paper with Greek notes in Jefferson's hand tucked in a volume of Plutarch's 'Lives.'”

Read more here…
http://www.monticello.org/site/blog-and-community/posts/find-lifetime-jefferson-books-quest-ends-washington-university

___________________________________

'Amazing' Discovery of Thomas Jefferson's Book Collection
(AP) – 8 hours ago

Read more here…
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iwxLkEIyX4rjSSON702srhD2F41w?docId=3e0c1564fe6f4ec28f829e633164783b

phil stone said...

Had some business with the town clerk today - the mess in Washington was mentioned and I told her it was due to the british citizen in the oval office who is not eligible to be president. She said she was a democrat and that one only had to be born in the US to be eligible - did not want to hear that Obama's friend the gov of HI was not able to find any documentation of his birth.Told her to read the constitution. How do we get somewhat intelligent people to read, understand, and acknowledge the truth when they have their own biased opinion and do not want to hear anything else?? These people vote in our elections. - old marine Phil Stone

Greg Goss said...

A place to ask questions.... I just read this at Lame Cherry. Barack Obama jr. was a British citizen. He acknowledges he had two British parents under the British Nationality Act. So I am assuming that this "two British" parents is a result of Sr's marriage to Ann? Does she become a British subject by marriage?

Dixhistory said...

Without the Birth Certificate and other records or if those records do show he is not a citizen, then he is an illegal alien. The same status as his aunt until a judge stepped in and said otherwise.

With the Birth Certificate and other records in order he is a US citizen.

Maybe with dual citizenship to this day. For sure he was at his birth. That is with facts known to us at this time. In either case he is not a US natural born citizen.

The real trouble lies with Congress and our Courts who refuse to state what a Natural Born Citizen is and who those people are that do not meet that definition as outlined in our US constitution.

Yes, I know all on here get this but as "old marine Phil Stone" points out, those that voted for this person chose to close their eyes and minds.

Without the so called media that most people watch to explain this to them, their is no pressure on any one to do any thing about this.

That is the mud we find our selves stuck in at this point in time.

8by8 said...

http://obamasgarden.wordpress.com/2011/02/13/coach-june-s-jones-iii-hes-more-important-to-the-american-public-than-barrack-whats-his-name/

This is very important. It shows that Hawaii must release records on Obama. Incredible story.

I hope Mario can use this info.

Everyone should spread this story viral.

Vivien said...

Lawmakers across the country are all looking to AZ for answers to immigration reform in their own states. This is of concern because AZ's Senate Bill 1308 defines a person with dual citizenship as a natural born United States citizen.http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/02/23/beware-arizona-senate-bill-1308-defines-dual-citizens-to-be-natural-born-citizens/

jayjay said...

Vivien:

Thanks for pointing out this idiotic AZ bill. They - like many other states - don't seem to grasp or care about the real meaning of the eligibiolity issue. This bill merely HELPS Obama.

puzo1moderator said...

An article posted at The Post & Email written by Paralegalnm:

A DISCUSSION OF NATIVE AND NATURAL-BORN CITIZENSHIP -- Fax this Memo to your Congressman | by paralegalnm | @ The Post & Email
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/02/24/fax-this-memo-to-your-congressman/

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
www.protectourliberty.org

Spaulding said...

Clearly, paralegalm has thought carefully about the extension of the meaning of natural born citizen, which was also the device used by Larry Tribe and Ted Olson in their flawed support of McCain in Senate Res 511. This is not a new issue, but one which seems in conflict with at least six supreme court justices who clearly assumed the Vattel-Grotius-Pufendorf interpretation, and not Larry Tribe or the Arizona Senate's interpretation.

To contribute something besides opinion, her is a principle from St. George Tucker's Blackstone Commentaries form 1802:

"Fifthly .... That neither the articles of confederation and perpetual union, nor, the present constitution of the United States, ever did, or do, authorize the federal government, or any department thereof, to
declare the common law or statutes of England, or of any other nation, to be the law of the land in the United States, generally, as one nation; nor to legislate upon, or exercise jurisdiction in, any case of municipal law, not delegated to the United States by the constitution."

Bob said...

When passing the 14th Amendment, the Congress had no intention of including the various Indian Tribes, which were not under the jurisdiction of the United States.

My great uncle was a full-blooded Cherokee, and while he fought for the United States during World War I, he was not granted citizenship until the 1920s, when President Calvin Cooledge extended citizenship to all American Indians.

8by8 said...

Andy Martin is not a NBC because his father was not a citizen when Andy was born. But Andy is running for Presidency officially.

So go sue Martin and that is the perfect case to get the courts to give a ruling. there will be no problem with discovery or standing etc. You will see. It is perfect.

The solution is so simple now.

Take Andy Martin to court. There will not be all the issues with Obama. Get the court to declare the definition of NBC is both parents being citizens.

Case closes on Andy Martin but it slams the door on Obama even harder without Obama being able to defend Martin.

This is the perfect case to get a court ruling. It will go through the courts fast. Grab this gift from God. Sue Martin on not being a NBC per his parents.

I am a NBC. We need to find a not NBC who has a father issue. Martin is a gift from god. Lets jump on it ASAP.

Please do not pass this up. It will be easy.