Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Is Obama Telling Us the Truth About His Place of Birth and Religion?

For those looking for an answer to this question, you may want to listen to the interview by NBC Nightly News anchor, Brian Williams, of Obama done on 8-29-10. The answers that Obama gives are quite revealing in this regard.

First, when Williams informed him that one-fifth of Americans do not believe that he is American-born and also believe that he is not a Christian but rather a Muslim, he answered "American born and Muslim are not the same thing?" And just what does Obama mean by that statement? He says, "the facts are the facts." But he surely does not tell us what those facts are.

Second, regarding the question of his birth place and religion, Obama says that he went through that during the campaign for Senator and President. Evidently, Obama feels that he has no obligation to tell the American people the truth about those issues at this time. Rather than address the issues with solid facts, he dismisses them as mere campaign smears which he has already overcome by winning the election.

Third, why would Obama believe that in order to address the question of where he was born he has to "spend all of [his] time with [his] birth certificate plastered on [his] forehead?" He tells us that to address the questions of concerned Americans regarding his birth certificate he would have to "spend all [his] time" on the birth certificate issue and that if he did he would not get much done. But how much time would it take for him to simply release his 1961 contemporaneous birth certificate to the public? He could start by posting it on the internet just like he posted in 2008 his questionable 2007 Certification of Live Birth (COLB). I can estimate the time for him to do that being 5 to 10 minutes.

Fourth, Obama says that he trusts in the "American people's capacity" to do the right thing and that he will "always put [his] money on the American people." If he has so much trust in them and would always "put his money on them," then why will he not release his birth certificate and his education, travel, and work documents for the American people to see?

We cannot put much trust in anything that Obama says. It is quite clear from Obama's answers that he is not telling the American people the truth about where he was born or about his religion. Rather, what we must do is ask him the proper questions and demand from him his evidence which proves that what he says in response to those questions is true.

And a special note to Brian Williams, it's a lot more than one-fifth of the American people asking questions. Up to 60% in this CNN poll have doubts about Obama's origins.

The interview can be seen here on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7dJqmfLR38

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
August 30, 2010
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####

Comments by CDR Kerchner (Ret):

Read this essay by Attorney Mario Apuzzo on the difference between being a "Citizen of the United States" and being a "natural born Citizen of the United States":
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/obama-maybe-citizen-of-united-states.html

Not telling the truth is in Obama's blood and part and parcel of who he is. It comes both from the teachings of Islam via his Islamic upbringing in Indonesia until approximately the age of 10 and also via his mastering the teachings of Saul Alinsky in the use of lying and deception to obtain your goals when he worked as a community organizer in Chicago.
1. Lying is the tool of the community organizer which was Obama's primary occupation prior to entering politics. Obama is a grandmaster of the teachings of Saul Alinsky who taught that lying and deception to reach your goal are perfectly acceptable. The ends justifies the means. See Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals: http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm
2. The Islamic Principle of Lying to Further the Advance of Islam. See "Understanding Taqiyya" http://www.islam-watch.org/Warner/Taqiyya-Islamic-Principle-Lying-for-Allah.htm
####

30 comments:

bdwilcox said...

"Food gained by fraud tastes sweet to a man, but he ends up with a mouth full of gravel."
-Proverbs 20:17 NIV

Methinks Obama is headed for a denture fitting.

Benaiah said...

John 10:1-2, 10
I tell you the truth, the man [USURPER] who does not enter the sheep pen [OFFICE OF PRESIDENT] by the gate [ARTICLE II, SECTION 1, CLAUSE 5 OF THE CONSTITUTION], but climbs in by some other way [FRAUD], is a thief and a robber. The man who enters by the gate [ARTICLE II NATURAL-BORN CITIZENSHIP - BORN IN THE COUNTRY, OF PARENTS WHO ARE CITIZENS] is the shepherd of his sheep [WE THE PEOPLE]. The thief [BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA] comes only to steal and kill and destroy [THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO ENSLAVE WE THE PEOPLE]…

Matthew 7:15
Watch out for false prophets [USURPERS & THOSE WHO SUPPORT USURPERS]. They come to you in sheep’s clothing [BRIAN WILLIAMS & NBC NIGHTLY NEWS] but inwardly they are ferocious wolves [WHO COME ONLY TO STEAL AND KILL AND DESTROY AMERICA].

bdwilcox said...

Benaiah, you left off the most important part of that passage from Matthew: "Ye shall know them by their fruits." Matthew 7:16 KJV

cfkerchner said...

From: ProtectOurLiberty.org - re. the Kerchner et al vs Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al Lawsuit

We need to raise $4000 as soon as possible for the professional printing and document binding required (40 copies in Supreme Court specification book form) and court filing expenses for filing the Writ of Certiorari for the Kerchner et al vs Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al case to the U.S. Supreme Court - Can you help? If you want the usurper Obama and his enablers such as Pelosi removed, here is one way you can help that battle. If you can, click the link below and make a donation. Any amount large or small. Thank you.

http://www.protectourliberty.org

Please feel free to re-post the above link and request to help the cause in raising the needed funds, where such posts and comments are permitted. And email this request for help to friends and patriots who can help.

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Pennsylvania USA
Lead Plaintiff
Kerchner et al vs Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al
http://www.protectourliberty.org
####

cfkerchner said...

Obama says ...

Obama - I've tried and lied but it won't go away!

Pass it along ...

jayjay said...

Let's fact it, almost anything Obama says is most likely a lie.

He "cain't hep it" as the former Congresswoman from TX once said about Bush.

bdwilcox said...

Obama drops the dime on himself:

"The only people who don't want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide."

Yeah, no kidding, buckaroo.

Great article by Joseph Farah, one of the few newsmen with cojones.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=197961

bdwilcox said...

Looks like tyranny reigns: LTC Lakin denied Obama's records to mount his defense because it might 'embarrass' the usurper.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=198465

itooktheredpill said...

"Is Obama Telling Us the Truth About His Place of Birth and Religion?"

No.

He knows what it means to Muslims when a person recites the Shahada in Arabic.

Barack Hussein Obama took Shahada

If you don't know what that means, then you need to read that post.

Robert said...

Army Col. Denise R. Lind has, by denying Col. Lakin access to evidence to which he is clearly entitled, has ruled against the constitution she has sworn to protect and defend. She should be relieved of her commission as a US Army Colonel and be publicly humiliated.

Any judge who chooses to deny access to simple public records because they might embarrass a man who is perpetrating an open fraud on our country is an embarrassment to her uniform and the court and a traitor to the constitution.

Lind's ruling that Obama's lack of legitimacy is "not relevant" is stupid on its face. No officer can obey an illegal order without himself being subject to court martial and being stripped of all Geneva convention protections should he be engaged in military action. It is the duty of all officers to exercise due diligence ascertaining the validity and legality of orders. Again, Obama's lack of constitutional qualification is no secret.

To suggest that the chain of command should only extend up to the Pentagon is a failure of logic beyond all comprehension. The oath of office is to protect and defend the Constitution - not the Pentagon - and not the President. Remember, the Constitution is above both on them in priority and authority. They are merely tools by which the Constitution is to be protected. They are replaceable.

I have the greatest respect for all those serving in the military. So, I must put a question to all of you who may not understand what Col. Lind has done. How can we expect a military that is afraid to ask an obvious fraud for common civil documents to protect and defend our country from anyone more dangerous than a Chicago street thug? Someone needs to go back for more training and an extra dose of backbone. What an embarrassment!

Some undocumented clown in the white house is sending men and women into battle and he can't find the time or the means to justify his claim to the office! His parties, golf games, and vacations are too taxing!

Are the Navy, Air Force, Marines, and Coast Guard going to step up and give cover. Why haven't they asked the question, yet? Aren't they still giving out orders? Who's going the have the guts to ask for Obama's credentials?

We were just notified that the brother of one of our students was killed in Iraq. He was probably sent there with an illegal order. How dare you not ask a simple question and demand an honest answer, NOW!!!

Let us move forward said...

Do you think that Col. Lind's acknowledgment that the President would be embarrassed is an admission that she knows what is really going on? Probably everyone in the military has at least an inkling.

But only the RETIRED generals have asked to see his bonafides. Have they discussed their doubts with the active generals? Some active generals must be aware, too, but perhaps feel like they can't ask the question and show respect to their commanding officer. Or is it because it would open the whole command structure of the military to charges of murder because the legal basis of the war could be challenged?

If the lies are uncovered after an unchallenged Mr. Obama leaves office, what will be the status of the military officers who have participated in these wars?

Puzo1 said...

Robert,

Could you send me your email address at my email address which is apuzzo@erols.com.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

bdwilcox said...

When the judge states that revealing Obama’s records might embarass him, implied within her statement is a foreknowledge of what is contained within those records. Could Lt. Lakin’s counsel ask the judge to recuse herself from this trial and then turn the tables by calling her as a witness?

jayjay said...

Robert:

Right you are on all counts ... and even more than that to make the ruling she did Lind made an implicit ruling that Obama was eligible and no other ruling fits the ridiculous opinions she put forth.

Her pay grade is not high enough to obviate the Constitution by making the man "eligible" without seeing a shred of evidence or hearing any witnesses. Not even the Supreme Court can rightfully do that. Her implicit ruling of "eligible" is not only laughable, it is treasonous and she shold be drummed out of the service along with the earlier LTC Driscoll who made the similar initial evidentiary ruling.

And she is wrong as hell on all counts. In fact it is quite clear that no one could have convened a hearing at 1100, listened to a presentation from each side, then called for a short lunch break where, while sipping on her Grande Kocha Latte and munching on her Braunschweiger she wrote her opinion sifting the presentation so far made, including cites and authorities and then needing 40 minutes to read it in court after lunch. Who is bambooxling who???

The woman obviously had been given a completely drafted opinion - most likely written by the DOJ or ever Bob Bauer in the Executive Branch as it hase the same tripe we've routinely heard from the Judicial Branch as though they originated it. In this case it is clear that the judge did none of hter own work but wss pressured into using a prepoared script provided by an ethically questionable source. She did not have sufficient time to do otherwise.

Embarrassment my butt!! The only embarrassment here is the action of yet another judge who certainly should (and quite possibly does) know better. Military officers swear an oath to the Constitution - not to the Pentagon as she tries to pretend. Moreover if the chain of command stops at the Pentagon then she has no legal authorization to even try LTC Lakin since such would have to come from the CIC.

It's worse than shameful ... it''s preposterous!!!

bdwilcox said...

Exactly, jayjay. And I would love to see her cross-examined to find out who crammed that canned opinion down her throat. Probably another treacherous Bauer / Perkins Coie plant like Siddharth Velamoor.

bdwilcox said...

Another question I have for Lind: "You said that the mechanism to remove a sitting president is through impeachment by Congress. If someone claiming to be President is actually an impostor, an illegal usurper, a fraud and not Constitutionally qualified to hold the office, can they still be impeached? If not, by what mechanism can they be removed?"

I would be very interested to hear her answer...

jayjay said...

bdwilcox:

I agree and would like to see her testifying under oath also - and we may yet get there.

After all, Obama has participated actively in felony criminal document fraud as shown by the dozen of more YouTube videos of Dr. Polland ... and there are a whole bunch of people involved in that. I think it's time that We The People stop allowing these criminal acts to go unpunished even if they are all by the looney leftist that the mainstream media so adores.

Robert said...

I think I'll set up an office next to Lind. Then I'll tell her I'm her new commanding officer and that she needs to start taking all orders directly and only from me.

Should she ask for my credentials I'll tell her that my credentials are my personal property and that they are really none of her business. I might even refer her to an image posted on the internet. If she persists I'll just make fun of her. I'll act flabbergasted that she expects me to where my ID on my forehead. Then I'll insinuate that her concerns are racially biased. Or, maybe I'll just say that she hates men. Perhaps I could get some friends to call in and complain that she obviously stands in the way of progress and the will of the people. Perhaps she should go to counseling.

I know this sounds ridiculous but, hey, it's working for Obama. Why should he be the only one to run this scam? There's a sucker born every minute!

Michael-Is-Great said...

WHEN Obama is going to be judged for deceiving the American people, ,knowing very well that he was not eligible to become the President of the USA, a fact that he knew very well because he was part of the inquiry committee who determined the eligibility of John McCain to be a candidate to run for presidency. WHEN?!!!!!

The Stacker said...

Mario,

Doesn't the argument given from most of the judges boil down to this?

They believe that voting someone IN as President of the United States of America WAIVES the Constitutional requirement. That's essentially what they are saying.

Can't we ask them this point blank so we get straight answers?

It's not a political question, it is a legal question (as in the highest law), but you already know that.

The trick is that no one knows what authority handles determining NBC, so that's why we get this run around.

Can't we sue the Federal Government for not at least formally telling us how someone is a NBC? How can we have elections without an agency? Wouldn't this type of suit work?

Thanks

cfkerchner said...

You Want Obama Removed! Here is something concrete you personally can do to help the cause and to help us work on doing exactly that! Help remove the Usurper in Chief. Donate today.

http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/donate.htm

If every follower of this blog raised $55 either by donating themselves or getting others to donate together $55, we'd have the goal achieved. Let's use synergy.

Pass the word! Pass this along to family, friends, and associates who can help the cause at this critical juncture in our legal battle to constitutionally remove the usurper. Any amount large or small will be sincerely appreciated.

Synergy at Work! If we all do and give a little, together we can accomplish a lot.

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Pennsylvania USA
http://www.protectourliberty.org
###

jayjay said...

Robert:

You should also tell her that you are (or might be) embarrassed. That's worked several times for Obama; the Lakin trial is not the first use of that dodge and it probably came from Bob Bauer in the Executive Offices.

jayjay said...

The Stacker:

It looks as though the nbC definition can most certainly be handled correctly and legally by the Supreme Court of the United States - and only they.

That's why it is so important to get the Kerchner et al action to SCOTUS. That's why we should all contribute whatever we can for that purpose instead of just whining and bitching about it.

Let's Roll!!!

Robert said...

The definition of "Natural Born Citizen" is what it is: "One born in the country to two citizen parents."

It is not up to the Supreme Court to define it. It is up to them to recognize it.

The Supreme Court, like all branches of our government, works for the people who, in turn, have received our rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (property) from God. We The People have hence empowered our government via certain enumerated powers so that it might serve us in the enjoyment of these rights.

Should the Supreme Court fail to recognize the well-established definition of "Natural Born Citizen" either through action or inaction we will be forced to reject them and all of the other responsible parties who have failed us in the same spirit that our founders embraced and stated in the Declaration of Independence.

cpanon said...

Hello
The current intellectual urbanity of this thread up to now makes me almost embarrassed to submit this. If only for background to the excellent comments and simple axiomatic legal reasoning extant and desire to see the promulgation higher, even viral.

In the last three days the counters(they are easily fungible) have increased 150K. Enjoy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Jhx_2TqffE

cfkerchner said...

Hi all,

As of midnight Sunday night we have raised $1800 of the $4000 challenge. See the latest results for the $4000 challenge and the overall campaign at this link.

http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/donate.htm

Give whatever you can. No amount is too small or too large. Pass the link around via your email lists and or post in blogs where such links are permitted. We need your help at this crucial fund raising time to pay for the special printing costs for the Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court and to continue our print media advertising campaign.

To those who have already donated, thank you.

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.protectourliberty.org

cfkerchner said...

Hi all,

We're now at the half way point for our $4000 challenge we need to raise immediately. We've raised $2000. See the details at this link:

http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/donate.htm

Keep passing the word and sharing this link at this crucial time. We need the donations and support to do what needs to be done this month.

Thank you to all who have given.

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.protectourliberty.org

Guy4013 said...

Dear Mario and Charles,

By now you may have learned that Mr. Lucas Smith has sent a certified letter to EVERY member of Congress outlining his copy of Obama's KENYA birth certificate along with other documents.

I have sent an exact copy of the letter to my congressional members so as they know the letters are public.

I recommend others do the same.

The letters are at postemail website.

I hope in some small way they might help you at the courts.

My SCOTUS contribution is on it's way.

Best wishes for success at SCOTUS!!

A pen said...

Could a subpoena duces tecum issue to the President of the
United States?
Yes, said Chief Justice Marshall
www.fjc.gov/history/burr.nsf/page/burr_pdf/$file/BurrTrial%28final%29.pdf

sect 1:13-14

The Stacker said...

It looks like the "West Wing" video was exposed as fraudulent on many accounts:

http://www.whpassfraud.cjb.net/

It's pretty undeniable. Very solid analysis.