Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR Kerchner will be guests on Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate on Wednesday, 2 June 2010, at 9:10 p.m. EST. Direct link to the show at BlogTalkRadio.com:http://www.blogtalkradio.com/drkate/2010/06/03/revolution-radio-obamas-constititional-disability
Also stop by and read Dr. Kate's blog at:
http://drkatesview.wordpress.com/
Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Commander USNR (Retired), Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
Please if you can, see this site and help the cause: http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####
Re-Posted for JayJay from the previous thread.
ReplyDeleteby JayJay:
--------------------
Mario Apuzzo & Charles Kerchner:
I'll be listening to Dr. Kate's show with the two of you this evening at 9:00 pm Eastern. Break a leg!!
Link here:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/drkate/2010/06/03/revolution-radio-obamas-constititional-disability
-----------------------
[the editor]
From Conservative Monster:
ReplyDelete"US Army Refuses Lt Col Lakin's Request for Discovery Evidence
breakingnews
This is an immediate grounds for a mistrial...
I know what that all of the military fellas will say that this is how military trials operate, but this issue is a national security issue and that is the difference. There is overwhelming evidence that Obama is not who he says he is and that Lt Col Lakin's allegations have merit, due to the constitutional crisis that this nation faces from a president with FOREIGN ties.
The Joint Chief's and the cowards beneath them have committed treason and violated their oaths in my opinion, because this could have been avoided before the 2008 election.
Military trial or NOT, this is still America and Lt Col Lakin is being denied a fair trial and the American people need to demand that the Hawaiian officials be forced to testify UNDER OATH. This charade has gone on long enough.
Barry's daddy was NOT an American citizen; therefore Obama is not a natural born citizen, because BOTH parents need to be US Citizens.
ARMY REFUSES LAKIN'S REQUEST TO HAVE PRESIDENT OBAMA TESTIFY AND REFUSES TO ALLOW ANY WITNESSES OR EVIDENCE FROM HAWAII OR ELSEWHERE ON ELIGIBILITY QUESTION - HEARING TO PROCEED ON JUNE 11th. "
http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/images/stories/documents/io_ruling_on_def_request_for_witnessesevid-usvlakin.pdf
At some point, shouldn't an argument be made to stop the endless attempts of the DOJ, in reference to the radio show, that your complaint is against a private citizen, and the DOJ needs to take a hike?
ReplyDeleteCharles and Mario,
ReplyDeleteI'm sure you know this but I had over looked it.
The opening paragraph of the Declaration of Independence 1776, comments on our laws being "Laws of Nature" (Vattel) and of "Nature's God"
Article 1 demands Congress punish "offenses against the laws of nations"
And yet, Hussein leads Americans on about being a "natural-born citizen.
I wish you the very best on June 29. I hope and pray you prevail in this most historic battle for truth and our Constitution.
Thank you for your historic efforts.
I think that Attorney Apuzzo needs this information. You may already have it, but someone is doing some very interesting research on those birth announcements. You won't believe it. Please check these two things out, and I'm sure she's not finished yet.
ReplyDeletehttp://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/extra-extra-announcing-obamas-birth/
Also, the one just put up today:
http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/06/06/graphs-and-stats/#comment-217
Man, y'all need to get over to that researcher's link that I gave to you and study that.
ReplyDeleteLook, what's the first thing judges say, oh, we've got his COLB and it's legit, then the second thing is, oh, then there's the birth announcements, then he must be an NBC.
Please go and study this, Apuzzo might can use it.
http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/extra-extra-announcing-obamas-birth/
Kitty,
ReplyDeleteCould you give a summary. The significance is puzzling.
Hi, Joe:
ReplyDeleteSorry, been forgetting to check back because I've been busy.
I hate to give just a brief summary, but here's a paragraph that she says about her research on the two birth announcements:
"Well, OK. The ONE and ONLY time that the two papers published the birth list, beginning at the first announcement, in order, was in the editions that obama’s birth announcement appeared. This was indeed the only time that these announcements were printed this way, as the closest the papers came to doing this again never had all the same names listed in the exact same order. I figured the ten day sample would give conclusive data as to if this was uncommon."
And she pulled a 10-day sample from the newspapers on the microfilm. Also, she's had someone working along with you in HA, while she was working here. And she still has more to put up. There is more in what she says.
And there's info about sliced microfilm. You'll just have to read it. Another good place that's it's being discussed is at FR.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2528961/posts?q=1&;page=1
Notice what GregNH in post 28 answers:
"To: Sola Veritas
I tried reading the blog and looking at the images. I don’t understand what the point of this is. Could you please give a summary of the researcher’s conclusions and why these were drawn? Summery Premise is that the announcements never appeared in the paper and were probably forged. In investigating this premise the researcher discovered that the announcements in both papers did not match in the issues before Obama's announcement and after, but only on the day OF his announcement. So in digging deeper this researcher also discovers the microfilm appears to be altered. Conclusion: No announcements appeared in the actual paper and the microfilm was altered."
Joe, you know how the judges and media people are, if it's on that stupid COLB and in the birth announcement, then BO's an NBC. They have to get past these things before they can think.
Judicial Watch
ReplyDeleteThe Supreme Ct refused to hear the eligibility case of Hillary Clinton.
The Constitution clause states no member of Congress can be appointed to a gov. post if that job's pay was increased during the term of the lawmaker.
So Hilliary could take the job, Congress lowered the SoS's salary to what it was before she voted for the raise when she was a senator.
Judicial Watch argued that they are circumventing the Constitution and that she was not eligible for the job.
A similar tactic has been used for other cabinet positions.
Tim Adams, former Chief Elections Clerk in Honolulu during the campaign and elections, says THERE IS NO LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE FOR OBAMA BECAUSE HE WAS NOT BORN IN HAWAII.
ReplyDeleteHe says his superiors openly admitted that there was absolutely no documentation for Obama.
http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2010/06/blog-post_8553.html
Further he says absentee voting records for members of the foreign service were stolen as they are political appointees, to determine who they voted for.
All:
ReplyDeleteI hope that all of you will read the extensive and far-ranging interview of Mario by Sharon Rondeau of The Post & Email blog here:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/06/09/the-post-emails-exclusive-interview-with-eligibility-attorney-mario-apuzzo/comment-page-1/#comment-12747
It provides a superb overview of the Kerchner et al action and the issues involved.
(Also has a new "mug shot" of Mario that makes his look even more like a Hollywood star - which he is not, yet).
Kudos to all involved. A wonderful summary of the entire case that would help almost anyone understand what is involved. I hope it can be incorporated into the upcoming Orals (if any)!
Excellent interview with Attorney Mario Apuzzo in The Post & Email. Bravo Zulu. Well done Mario!
ReplyDeleteHere is the link to it as an active link:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/06/09/the-post-emails-exclusive-interview-with-eligibility-attorney-mario-apuzzo/
CDR Kerchner
For Charles and Mario,
ReplyDeleteTim Adams, the Chief Elections Clerk for the city of Honolulu in 2008 stated on air that in his profession opinion Obama was NOT born in Hawaii. Further, he stated Hawaii has NO long form birth certificate.
Available at YT, "Tim Adams, Chief Election clerk.."
I believe the leaks are beginning to come out.
Good luck 6/29 and my prayers are with you both.
I think Lakin needs your help!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vv60KwoL9mo&feature=player_embedded#at=241
Hawaii Confirms Tim Adams Was 'Senior Elections Clerk' in the 2008 Election. Tim Adams is also a Hillary Clinton Supporter! Tim Adams says Obama was not born in Hawaii and that people in the Hawaii elections office and his bosses there knew it in 2008! | Birther Report: Obama Release Your Records
ReplyDeletehttp://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/06/hawaii-confirms-tim-adams-was-senior.html
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/06/purported-former-chief-elections-clerk.html
CDR Kerchner
A long-form hospital birth certificate in Hawaii does not exist per Tim Adams who lived and worked in Hawaii for 10 years and worked in the Election Office in Hawaii during the 2008 Presidential Election:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=165041
Here is how the BIRTH REGISTRATION FRAUD was perpetrated by Obama's maternal grandmother who falsely and illegally registered here newborn grandson as being born in Hawaii, when he was not. This false registration resulted in creation of a falsified vital record and Certification of Live Birth and the subsequent newspaper notices placed in the local papers by the state's Bureau of Health Statistics.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmZpwcRf3FQ
When will Congress and the Main Stream Media do its duty and investigate this matter in a serious and legal manner? This is a national disgrace!
CDR Charles Kerchner
Lead Plaintiff
Kerchner v Obama & Congress
http://www.protectourliberty.org
STOP & READ -- NOW!!!
ReplyDeleteHawaii elections clerk:
Obama not born here:
http://bit.ly/9oVuv4
hear Tim Adams in his own words.
ReplyDeleteWhat took him so long?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9AV4YxiD7Jo
Let Us Move Forward proffered the following comment today (the Editor)
ReplyDelete-----------------------
Tim Adams does believe that Mr. Obama was born in the US. Tim Adams doesn't believe that birth in US is necessary.
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2010/06/11/trsol-exclusive-hi-elections-clerk-i-believe-obama-is-eligible-to-hold-office/comment-page-1/#comment-36301
-------------------
That is NOT what Tim Adams said in his follow on statement/email to Phil at the TRSOL site.
Tim Adams told Phil in his email that he believes that Obama was NOT born in Hawaii but still believes that Obama was born a U.S. Citizen (via his mother) and thus is eligible to serve as POTUS. See this quote from the email from Mr. Adams to Phil.
----------------------
Phil,
... I believe Pres. Obama was born a United States citizen, and is eligible to hold office, I find the idea that because he was probably born outside of the U.S., he must be some kind of alien to be basically racist. I do think we should close this issue and pass legislation requiring office seekers to prove identity before running for elected office.
Thanks for the kind inquiry
------------------------
Thus, while Mr. Adams and his superiors in the Elections Office in 2008 investigated and actually contacted the various hospitals in Hawaii and learned that Obama was not born at any of the hospitals in Hawaii, he is misinformed on what the term "natural born Citizen" means in the U.S. Constitution. Mr. Adams believes that all you have to be to serve as POTUS and CINC of the Military is to be a Citizen of the U.S. That is not the case as all who read this forum should know by now. If not, here is a link to Mario's excellent essay on that subject.
Obama May Be a Citizen of the U.S. but he is NOT a "natural born Citizen" of the U.S."
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/obama-maybe-citizen-of-united-states.html
CDR Kerchner
(the Editor)
Mr Kerchner,
ReplyDeleteSorry if I forgot the "not" between the does and believe. In my mind I typed the "not." I usually proof read what I post but I wrote and submitted that comment in a rush.
There is quite a discussion going on at TRSOL under the link offered about WND and Mr. Adams. Phil has also offered three updates with more info.
Another confirmation that Obama was not born in Hawaii with the following "BREAKING NEWS! Hawaii Elections Official: Obama not born here! JUNE 10, 2010 - SMOKING" at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wo3Aj2eqmS8&feature=player_embedded#!
ReplyDeleteWHEN is Justice be done on this matter of Obama's non-eligibility to be President of the USA?!!!!
There is BREAKING NEWS TODAY--------- Please see this BREAKING NEWS VIDEO: It PROVES OBAMA WAS NOT BORN IN THE USA.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wo3Aj2eqmS8
Here is a radio show that has a little bit more information.
ReplyDeletePeter Boyles interviewed Bob Unruh and Joe Kovac
http://www.khow.com/cc-common/podcast/single_podcast.html?podcast=fullshow_boyles.xml
Joe,
ReplyDeleteI have made your link a hot link here:
http://www.khow.com/cc-common/podcast/single_podcast.html?podcast=fullshow_boyles.xml
Peter's radio show is many hours long and is online in multiple one hour segments. Can you tell our readers the date of the show and on which hour of the show and about how many minutes into that hour of the show that the interview you mention starts? That would be useful for ease and convenience in finding the relevant segment of his show now and in the future. Thanks.
CDR Kerchner
Joe, I think this is the relevant segment on the Thursday, 10 June 2010, segment of Peter Boyle's show. It starts about 5 minutes in after the news.
ReplyDeletehttp://a1135.g.akamai.net/f/1135/18227/1h/cchannel.download.akamai.com/18227/podcast/DENVER-CO/KHOW-AM/061010PETE8A.mp3
CDR Kerchner
Oh sorry everyone.
ReplyDeleteThe first one is with Bob Unruh, on June 10th, in the 7:00 AM hour at 1 minute and 48 secs.
The second one is with Joe Kovac, on June 10th, in the 8:00 am hour at 2 minutes and 38 secs.
This link will get you to both parts.
http://www.khow.com/cc-common/podcast/single_podcast.html?podcast=fullshow_boyles.xml
Charles, what do you think of all this? Can Mario comment on what he thinks can be done, if someone is able to get him to swear on it??
That may be the closet thing to evidence we may get.
He's willing to testify!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=165981
Get this guy to LTC Terry lakin's legal team.
Charles, Mario,
ReplyDeleteCould we ask him to take a polygraph. No matter what anyone says about polygraphs, they still use them.
Can the best polygrapher be contacted to administer it, twice?