Tuesday, August 11, 2009

The Logical Analysis of a Natural Born Citizen

The Logical Analysis of a Natural Born Citizen
and the Clear and Compelling Evidence That
Barack Hussein Obama, II is NOT a Natural Born Citizen

http://birthers.org/misc/logic.htm
by: Teo the Bear, TheBirthers.org

####

13 comments:

jayjay said...

Great contribution by Br'er Bear!!!

cfkerchner said...

Hi Teo,

Outstanding job. Bravo Zulu!

Charles

Benaiah said...

Great job Teo Bear...

Thank you!

Chief said...

Great job! Thanks for the visuals for my congressional members; they must have difficulty reading and comprehending what they read without visual support; at least that was my assumptiona and message when I sent them the link.

Again great job!

James said...

Given the powers and abilities endowed to the POTUS, he or she must possess the highest degree of citizenship that insures 100% allegiance. This degree of citizenship is one who is born on US Soil to 2 US citizens. Interestingly enough, the largest pool of the American Population are those born on US Soil to 2 US Citizens. It is this pool of people in which the the POTUS is chosen from. The persons who are our POTUSes are derived from the “Children” of our nation; those that are born on US Soil to 2US Citizens.(2nd Generation Americans) Their allegiences to US are ABSOLUTE at birth which why we chose those persons. Allegience is NOT ABSOLUTE at birth for those born to aliens.

Further, our nation was founded by Americans (US Citizens) not by aliens. It was their children who perpetuated our nation; those born on US soil 2 US citizens.

James said...

Could Barack Obama SR. have been a foreign diplomat or an ambassodor the US? If so, this definitely would exempt Obama good since specific provisions exempt children of foreign diplomats and ambassadors from “Natural Born” citizenship:

From Wiki:

Obama Sr. received a scholarship in economics through a program organized by nationalist leader Tom Mboya. The program offered Western educational opportunities to outstanding Kenyan students. [14] President Obama said of his father’s scholarship, “The Kennedys decided: ‘We’re going to do an airlift. We’re going to go to Africa and start bringing young Africans over to this country and give them scholarships to study so they can learn what a wonderful country America is. This young man named Barack Obama [Sr.] got one of those tickets and came over to this country.’”

In 1959 Mboya organized the Airlift Africa project, together with the African-American Students Foundation in the United States, through which 81 Kenyan students were flown to the U.S. to study at U.S. universities. One of them was Barack Obama’s father. In 1960 the Kennedy brothers joined this project, after Mboya visited them for that purpose, and Airlift Africa was extended to Uganda, Tanganyika and Zanzibar (now Tanzania), Northern Rhodesia (now Zambia), Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe), and Nyasaland (now Malawi). Some 230 African students received scholarships to study at Class I accredited colleges in the United States.

It would all depend upon the meaning of the legal term and context of “Diplomat” and “Ambassador”.

James said...

If it could be shown or proven that Obama SR. was acting as a Foreign Diplomat from Kenya as part of an international Educational Culture exchange program, Obama would exempted completely as children of diplomats can't be conveyed "Natural Born" citizenship regardless if we were to accept that a "Natural Born" citizen as only being born on US Soil.

It would all depend on examining the legal context of a foreign diplomat.

Perhaps an angle of this contraversy worth investigating

James said...

I wonder when the court is going to render its decision? I also wonder if the Judge is reading this blog and other blogs. This may indeed be true. I know that one of the Federal Judges during the Schiavo Case of 2005 was reading blogs and message boards while handling the Schiavo matter.

jayjay said...

James:

Actually, Obama has already told everyone in writing many times that his daddy was a Brit and that alone makes him anything but a NBC.

Benaiah said...

Obama's healthcare horror
Heads should roll -- beginning with Nancy Pelosi's!
By Camille Paglia

http://www.salon.com/opinion/paglia/2009/08/12/town_halls/

"And what do Democrats stand for, if they are so ready to defame concerned citizens as the "mob" -- a word betraying a Marie Antoinette delusion of superiority to ordinary mortals. I thought my party was populist, attentive to the needs and wishes of those outside the power structure. And as a product of the 1960s, I thought the Democratic party was passionately committed to freedom of thought and speech.

But somehow liberals have drifted into a strange servility toward big government, which they revere as a godlike foster father-mother who can dispense all bounty and magically heal all ills. The ethical collapse of the left was nowhere more evident than in the near total silence of liberal media and Web sites at the Obama administration's outrageous solicitation to private citizens to report unacceptable "casual conversations" to the White House. If Republicans had done this, there would have been an angry explosion by Democrats from coast to coast. I was stunned at the failure of liberals to see the blatant totalitarianism in this incident, which the president should have immediately denounced. His failure to do so implicates him in it."

rx said...

Attorney Apuzzo,

Can you verify this statement from a legal perspective? I realize that International Law may not be your forte, but perhaps you know of an attorney who could affirm or reject this statement:

"A dual citizen on the other hand can’t make certain treaties under International Law"

From here:
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/11/28/natural-born-citizens-or-how-to-beat-a-subject-to-death-with-a-stick/

On the surface, that statement may not look like much. But if it is indeed true, it could be used as a bonafide legal reason why Barry couldn't/shouldn't be POTUS.

Pragmaticite said...

Beautiful graphic; very effective conveyance of the concept. Is this going to appear in a forthcoming advertorial?

I think even CongresssCritters might be able to understand this!

Teo Bear said...

Dear Pragmaticite,

If you want to see it as an advertorial I have no objections to Charlie and Mario using it in an advertorial. But I would think that they would need your help paying for it. So donate what you can to http://protectourliberty.org/


I have no objection to anyone posting it on their website, provided that if you are quoting anything it is not altered and you provide a link to the original article at http://thebirthers.org/misc/logic.htm.

I will try and layout the essay as a 1/2 page in Acrobat so anyone can take it to the local paper if they want and post it on our flyers page.