Sunday, June 28, 2009

The Chalice Show - Patriot's Heart Broadcasting - BlogTalkRadio Network -10:15 p.m. EDT Sunday 28 Jun 2009 - Kerchner et al v. Obama & Congress

The lead plaintiff, Mr. Charles Kerchner, in the 'Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al' case, and I will be on the Patriot's Heart Broadcasting Network, The Chalice Show, talk radio show Sunday evening, 10 Jun 2009, during the 2nd half of the show, 20 minutes in at approximately from 10:20 to 10:55 p.m. EDT. The show is on the BlogTalkRadio.com network which is broadcast via the internet. I will be providing an update regarding the recent activity in the case, including the recent attempt to get the case dismissed. Mr. Kerchner and I will then take Q&A from the host Chalice and the listening audience. Feel free to spread this announcement. I hope to hear from you on the show.

To listen to this BlogTalkRadio.com show live or via the archives in the On Demand section after the show is broadcast, use the below link which will take you straight to the show. Listen to the lead in intro music for a few minutes after which the show starts: Chalice & the Patriots Heart Network Radio Show

Patriot Heart Network webapge: http://www.patriotsheartnetwork.com/

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

P.S. Also, please feel free to join the discussions and comments in this forum about the subject of the Natural Born Citizenship clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution by [Clicking Here].
####

16 comments:

mtngoat61 said...

Great show Mario. You did a great job explaining the last filing.

Goat

Nick said...

Terrific work on the show. One thing I want to note, though, is that it's best to have people send their letters via USPS or FedEx. According to what is stated at http://www.njd.uscourts.gov/FAQS.html#faxpleadings faxes may not be accepted into the record. I don't know if that applies ONLY to pleadings, or all records. There's no way of knowing because the court accepting these letters is not typical. To play it safe, I say people should send physical letters.

Puzo1 said...

Moved and edited James' comment. FAX letters are no longer being accepted. Thus I edited out the FAX number and FAX references and re-posted James' input.

James said:
June 29, 2009 5:49 AM

The following is a summary from Charles Kerchner and Mario Apuzzo on their court case. You can also read more about the case at http://puzo1.blogspot.com

The Kerchner v Obama & Congress case.

Here is the Defendants motion and supporting brief attempting to get a dismissal.

Read it here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/16831085/

Note: The recent motion and supporting brief for dismissal by the defendants
in the case has now moved it from the “continued stalling phase” by the defendants which was being handled at the Magistrate Judge level, up to a higher level in the court system, i.e., to the full U.S. District Judge level assigned to this case. He will make the decision on the motion to dismiss, not the Magistrate
Judge.

The U.S. District Judge assigned to this case is The Honorable Jerome B. Simandle. Thus if anyone wants to write a letter and send it to the Judge in this case from this point on, regarding the defendants attempts to get a
dismissal without the merits being addressed, the correspondence should be
addressed to the U.S. District Judge, Jerome B. Simandle. He is basically at the same address as Magistrate Judge Schneider. However, I will repeat it here for the convenience of the readers. Be sure to reference in your writing that it is in reference to the Kerchner v Obama & Congress case:

Honorable Jerome B. Simandle,
U.S. District Judge
United States Courthouse
Mitchell H. Cohen Building
4th & Cooper Streets
Camden NJ 08101

------------------------------------

But remember though, the U.S. District Judge and/or the Magistrate Judge were not asking for these letters. The first round came in spontaneously. Now, I as the Lead Plaintiff am asking for more. :-) And, we were as surprised as anyone when we saw those initial letters being put into the public record for the case on the PACER system. We do not know if they will continue to put future letters in the record. Either way still want letters sent to the Judge at this
critical standing decision making point in the case. At this point I wish to have
thousands of letters written to the Judge about the case and tell them how "we the people" feel about the words in that motion to dismiss and the supporting brief.

The chutzpah of those lawyers saying the defendants have "sovereign immunity" on a Constitutional Matter such as this! This case is not about some simple misstatement or simple policy slip up or politics. This is a serious legal matter. This is about violation of our Constitution. "We the people" are the sovereigns! We created the Constitution and the LIMITED federal government. It is now out of control. And as parts of the federal government, the President and Congress are NOT Sovereign and above the laws and our Constitution, when it
comes to Constitutional matters. And we will be asking the court to so rule,
grant we Plaintiffs standing, and not dismiss the case.

roderick said...

judges have in the past thrown out certain laws passed by legislatures be it state or federal based on the breach of constitution toward a dissenting minority

capedeh said...

the move of obama is well expected even by me. But I must tell y'all, that if a Indonesian civilian like me know that barry o is or once an Indonesian then all the candidates of Indonesian presidency race knew and will use this for the sake of theirs. Current presiden were once being asked by Bush admin about were there Obama is muslim or not, they simply answer no, but they were lied, for the school cerfiticate (real one) told he is muslim but above of all that he is indonesia, in which all Indonesian but me kept silence in order to make him the US president. Just google it under"obama bukan muslim" then tranlate your self in english Look further the main reason I write you this on my blog in Israel insider under" Obama lies and hidden truth. Megawati soekrnoputri husband, her running mate now, prabowo subianto and all her rival in Indonesian presidency contest all know about this. chek also menelusuri jejak obama di jakarta and of course translate again

capedeh said...

any one that stayed on indonesian soil is subject to indonesian law regardless the country (usa) said otherwise. If obama never moved to Indonesian soil, adopted by lolo soetoro and even the school record said that he is warga negara Indonesia (citizenship: Indonesian) then he perhaps still Americans like his supporters tell to the US people, however once he moved to Indonesian soil and become Indonesian citizen the he renounced his american/kenyan citizenship regardless under his parents wish/order for minor must follow the parents or guardian guide until that person is married or reach 17 years old.

nswinstonvb said...

Excellent show! During the chat, I had mentioned the Kenyan Birth Cert. offered for sale on eBay. The seller is offering to meet before the sale and welcomes the auction winner to bring along a forensic document examiner. If found to be fraudulent in any way, the winner is not required to pay.

James said...

Just some points on the issue of your standing dilemma:

I believe Charles has standing:

Charles is retired military and subject to possible recall.

This would separate Charle's harm from million of other voters as not everyone is retired military and subject to possible recall.

Further, Charles took the oath to defend the US Constitution. Obama's ineligibility harms Charles in that Obama is harming or tainting the oath that Charles swore to. There is no indication the Charles has recinded his sworn oath to defend the US Constitution.

Further, "million of other voters" did not take the oath which places Charles is specific subset of voters.

Charles is in specific subset of voters who are retired military subject to possible recall and who have taken the oath sworn to defend the US Constitution.

These facts separate Charle's alleged greviences from that of "Millions of voters" since "millions of voters" may not be subject to recall and have not taken the oath to defend the US Constitution.

Hope my thoughts can help.

capedeh said...

while you were attacking him over here, wouldn't you mind to give aid to dr orly and alan keyes to make sure that occidental colledge open the record of barry soetoro/barry obama or barack husein obama ii. if this one is open and truly showed that he is enlist as foreign student and citizenship is indonesian then you shall get the solid prove that he is an indonesian and could asked more opening for the rest of his document.I telling you this for I see his friend show up his picture in occidental college and remembered him as Barry. Check on LA times+occidental college+obama picture on google and also look at the law of UU no62. tahun 1958 that being applied during his time in Indonesia.

squinlivan said...

Mario,

WHAT A THOUGHT ????

What if you ask this court to certify the question to the US Supreme Court to define NBC because neither side ca continue without this "final decision" of NBC an original issue because if the court were to decide for either side it would have to KNOW what NBC meant to dismiss or how to construct an order requiring "complaince with the constitution" after all the defendants DID "vet McCain (right or wrong) they did vet him, BUT their result, "non-binding" clearly shows their lack of conviction re NBC,...don't ya think???

sjc said...

Re: Motion for Dismissal- As a layman I found your arguement of a "Catch 22" being most compelling. Defendants laying claim for dismissal based upon two mutually self-canceling events is ridiculous. Also the Congressional body viewed as "above " the Constitution by the attys for defendant is outrageous, and that is going over with a federal judge like a lead balloon. Kerchner is sharp as a tack,and we owe this man a national debt of gratitude for pursuing this action. Thank you Mr. Kerchner, for your patriotism, maybe we can leave this republic in one piece for the next generations.

cfkerchner said...

Copy of my latest email to Glenn Beck:

30 June 2009

Hi Glenn,

There has been important activity in the Kerchner v Obama & Congress case. The defendants' have finally made a motion after over 4 months of stalling and not answering. It is what we expected as the next phase of this case and this will allow the case to get to that next step and beyond the defendants continued stalling phase. Mario is very confident we will defeat the motion by the defendants. Thousands of people are now aware of this lawsuit and have written the Judge personal letters. See link 2 below. This is a very important legal matter about the sanctity and sovereignty of our Constitution and the future of our Constitutional Republic. For more details see the post in Atty Mario Apuzzo's blog, link 1 below:

1. http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/activity-in-kerchner-v-obama-congress_26.html

2. http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=6404

Would you be willing to invite Atty Apuzzo, and/or the two of us, to be a guest on your show to explain the latest activity and our next action?

You can contact him at: "apuzzo@erols.com" or call at: 732-521-1900

He'd be very happy to do a 15 or 20 minute segment with you to inform you and your audience about this case. If interested, please contact Atty Apuzzo and arrange a mutually convenient date and time. He would be happy to appear on your radio or TV show show if you can provide him prearranged time slot. You pick the date and the time and provide the contact number.

Sincerely,

Charles Kerchner
Lehigh Valley PA
Lead Plaintiff
Kerchner v Obama & Congress

sjc said...

I think something to bear in mind, when the multitude of case law precedents are introduced to the courts, most of it, like spaghetti, is intended to see just how much of it will stick to the wall.
However what precedents are there which truly have relevance to presidential elections? We've only had 43 presidents, and 1 usurper. Aren't the legal waters fairly pristine, and should not the strict interpretation of the constitution be in order. This isn't baseball where hitting 2 for 3 is a good night at the plate. Art II's Natural Born Citizenship requirement is an integrated device which all aspects must be operative or it's unique intent fails to serve it's purpose. In the age of nuclear annihilation I demand a C-I-C who has no foreign loyalties.

cfkerchner said...

Copy of email I sent to the show producer for O'Reilly, Hannity, Beck, Cunningham, Fox News Specials, and many more:

30 June 2009

Dear Show Producer:

There has been important activity in the Kerchner v Obama & Congress case. The defendants' have finally made a motion after over 4 months of stalling and not answer. It is what we expected as the next phase of this case and this will allow the case to get to that next step and beyond the defendants continued stalling phase. Mario is very confident we will defeat the motion by the defendants. Thousands of people are now aware of this lawsuit and have written the Judge personal letters. See link 2 below. This is a very important legal matter about the sanctity and sovereignty of our Constitution and the future of our Constitutional Republic. For more details see the post in Atty Mario Apuzzo's blog, link 1 below:

1. http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/activity-in-kerchner-v-obama-congress_26.html

2.
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=6404

Would you be willing to invite Atty Apuzzo, and/or the two of us, to be a guest on your show to explain the latest activity and our next action?

You can contact him at: "apuzzo@erols.com"
Or call at: 732-521-1900
Or FAX at: 732-521-3906
Blog with my address: http://puzo1.blogspot.com

We'd be very happy to do a 15 or 20 minute segment with you to inform you and your audience about this case. If interested, please contact Atty Apuzzo and arrange a mutually convenient date and time. We would be happy to appear on your radio or TV show show if you can provide him prearranged time slot. You pick the date and the time and provide the contact number.

Sincerely,

Charles Kerchner
Lehigh Valley PA
Lead Plaintiff
Kerchner v Obama & Congress

Nick said...

And here's the contact info for Hannity's radio show:

1-800-941-7326

3:00-6:00 P.M. EST

http://www.hannity.com/


And Lou Dobbs:

1-877-55-DOBBS

2:00-6:00 P.M. EST weekdays

http://loudobbsradio.com/


Most of these mainstream types are untrustworthy, but Dobbs seems to be genuine. Anyway, if you get these guys live on the air, they'll be forced to talk about it. And if they cut you off it will make them sound not-very-conservative to their audiences.

You might also try:

1. http://michaelmedved.townhall.com/

2. http://dennisprager.townhall.com/

3. http://www.lauraingraham.com/pg/jsp/general/show.jsp

iamatraveler said...

Don't despair, just keep attacking Obama at all angles. He will fall.
One way to expose Obama and stop his tyranny is to get the conservative media hosts on our side.
We are waging a massive header campaign to hopefully accomplish this -
It is very easy:
Everyday everybody sends them an email with nothing but 'Obama's attorneys are hiding his vaulted birth certificate' on the subject line.
me@glennbeck.com
hannity@foxnews.com
oreilly@foxnews.com
writemalkin@gmail.com
rush@eibnet.com
dickmorris@dickmorris.com
infor@gop.com (M. Steele)

Please help broadcast this project by the bloggers at PRN. We need thousands to send the headers daily until they act!
Thanks.