Saturday, April 11, 2009

Constitutional Radio Talk Show - BlogTalkRadio Network

I am pleased to announce that the lead plaintiff, Mr. Charles Kerchner, in the 'Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al' case, and I will be on the Constitutional Radio talk show Tuesday evening, 14 April 2009, a 10:00 p.m. EDT. The show is on the BlogTalkRadio.com network which is broadcast via the internet. I will be providing an update for the case. Mr. Kerchner and I will then take Q&A from the co-hosts, Marnie Delano (Dame Central) and Dr. Kate, and via phone calls from the listening audience. The call in number for the show will be: 347-202-0443. There is also a chat room which the listeners can participate in live while the show is on the air. Feel free to spread this announcement to people interested in this case. I hope to hear from you on the radio show.

To listen to the BlogTalkRadio.com show live or via the archives in the On Demand section after the show is broadcast, use the below link which will take you straight to the show. Listen to the lead in intro music for a few minutes after which the show starts:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/My-Two-Cents/2009/04/15/My-Two-Cents-Presents-Constitutional-Radio

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
185 Gatzmer Avenue
Jamesburg NJ 08831
Email: apuzzo [AT] erols.com
TEL: 732-521-1900 ~ FAX: 732-521-3906
BLOG: http://puzo1.blogspot.com

P.S. Please feel free to join the discussions and comments in this forum about the subject of the Natural Born Citizenship clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution by [Clicking Here].
####

4 comments:

V said...

I sent a Letter of Rederss to Mr. Barack Obama, marked Personal and Confidential, which was delivered on March 12, 2009. My legal basis for this action was the First Amendment to the Constitution. He never responded, and therefore he admitted, under the terms of such Letter, that he is ineligible to the Office of President of the United States of America.

My question is: To which enforcer of Laws shall I turn to have the admitted usurper evicted from the White House, thus the Office? Shall it be the local Sheriff, the Capitol Police, or even Acting President Joe Biden? Please advise.

Which party is responsible for this proper restoration of our Republic? I doubt that the People should handle it, en masse. There must be a more civil way. Although he has admitted that he has no Constitutional authority to govern, I sense that he will not quit voluntarily. Thanks.

Joe said...

Mario,
Got a question for the right answer.

I listened to this show and you spoke about threshold issues;
jurisdiction, standing, cause of action etc.

Do you believe your case can defeat these issues and go on to hear the merits?

Not an easy way to ask this question but basically I am asking, do you have all your ducks in a row. Have you covered all the bases?

So there should be no surprises (except bias from the Judge)? Correct?

Puzo1 said...

Joe:

I have been diligently preparing the Kerchner case. But I hope you would not expect me to have it all figured out already. This is the first time in history that we have an issue of whether a sitting President is legitimate. There is no court precedent for our action or any national experience to which we can look. I do not know what would make you think that I would have all the answers to all the complex legal issues that will be raised and debated in this case. Let us see what the defendants throw at us as defenses and we will respond. I hope I gave the right answer to your question.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

Joe said...

Mr. Apuzzo,
Thank you for your response. I have all my fingers crossed for you and well, for us all. Your case looks good and I am waiting patiently for the 23rd. I am a little nervous because I know how fleeting justice can be. Perhaps if something unexpected comes up, it can be repaired and refiled.

Anyway did you ever get that doc from northern CA?

Good luck!!!!!

many depend on this outcome.