Sunday, December 28, 2008

Was Obama Properly Vetted for the Office of President?

Why do we currently have the massive debate over the question of whether Obama is constitutionally qualified to be President? On properly vetting Obama, our own political leaders, institutions, political parties, and main stream media have failed the people miserably and they should be taken to task after this is all said and done. One example of this failure can be seen from the August 12, 2008 interview by Hannity & Comes of Howard Wolfson, FOX News contributor and former Clinton communications director. Hannity asked: “Do you regret not vetting, you know, Senator Obama the way he should have been?” Wolfson responded: “No, I mean the media is tasked with the responsibility of vetting candidates. . . .” As we can see, all the players involved will simply point the finger at the other on the question of who was suppose to properly vet Obama. Another question that we need to ask is why was Obama not vetted properly?

Some concerned and well-informed Americans realize that our leaders have failed us in this regard and so have themselves demanded some straight answers-call it a vetting by We the People. These concerned Americans, in this time of crisis, have petitioned their government and political and legal institutions for help in resolving the question of whether Obama is Constitutionally eligible to be President. Their efforts have so far been in vain. Fortunately, these Americans have exercised their First Amendment right of free speech and have not had to rely on their government and these other institutions to have their grievance heard.

The internet has revolutionized society by giving individuals greater ability to guide their own destinies by participating in and benefiting from collective intelligence. Hence, concerned Americans have used the internet to bring to the fore the issue of Obama's eligibility to be President and have placed their hope in the U.S. Supreme Court to decide that issue. Some brave attorneys and pro se litigants, who have had the courage to put their necks on the line, have helped these concerned Americans. We the people should be forever grateful to them, regardless of what the Supreme Court decides. This whole process shows that we the people will not be fooled so easily. We will and must stand up and fight until we get a straight answer.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

December 28, 2008

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

You believe so only because you believe in this cause.

If it were other people tilting at windmills for a cause that you did not believe in, would you find that acceptable? What about the judicial resources it takes to process these suits? An acceptable cost -- because you believe in the cause? Or should all true believers be able to crowd out other litigants?

Lee said...

Please see : Letter of Marque and Reprisal - Filed and so Granted by Congress of the USA - puts the Provost Marshal on Notice http://www.rayservers.com/blog And : http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com/2009/01/open-thread-comments-not-on-topic-of.html Mario,you and the the other attys have valid arguments for your positions.But all of you are uder the false impression that we are under the organic Con and simply are dealing with corruption.It is much deeper than that.Leo is not going to succeed any further than you or any of the other attys in this eligbility matter.The root needs to be pulled.Attacking the rotthen branches and seeking a remedy in a sytem that in nonexistant is and exercise in futility.Sadly,this is all coming to a head shortly-- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvUh5guvIvU&feature=PlayList&p=1E27746D1967C8B6&index=0&playnext=1

Puzo1 said...

Lee has left a new comment on your post "Was Obama Properly Vetted for the Office of Presid...":

Please see : [editor's deletion] Mario,you and the the other attys have valid arguments for your positions.But all of you are uder the false impression that we are under the organic Con and simply are dealing with corruption.It is much deeper than that.Leo is not going to succeed any further than you or any of the other attys in this eligbility matter.The root needs to be pulled.Attacking the rotthen branches and seeking a remedy in a sytem that in nonexistant is and exercise in futility.Sadly,this is all coming to a head shortly-- [editor's deletion]