tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post7779117805802700579..comments2024-03-02T14:24:03.076-05:00Comments on Natural Born Citizen - A Place to Ask Questions and Get the Right Answers: An Analysis of the Current Revelations of Hawaii’s Dr. Chiyome Fukino to NBC News Regarding Obama’s Place of BirthMario Apuzzo, Esq. http://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181noreply@blogger.comBlogger31125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-14927766829539469762011-04-22T13:16:50.419-04:002011-04-22T13:16:50.419-04:00RiverQueen,
There are a lot more sources in Kenya...RiverQueen,<br /><br />There are a lot more sources in Kenya and Africa in general saying Obama was Kenyan Born, born in Kenya, and not in the USA. See this link for the collection:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.scribd.com/my_document_collections/2441535" rel="nofollow">http://www.scribd.com/my_document_collections/2441535</a>puzo1moderatorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14344806874980130928noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-71580297219242431132011-04-22T06:50:35.552-04:002011-04-22T06:50:35.552-04:00Hi:
Thought you might like ot see this article fr...Hi:<br /><br />Thought you might like ot see this article from the Kenyan newspaper the Standard it is from their archives when Obama was running for Senator. I think this is proof that Presidente Obama is not eligble. Enjoy!<br />http://classic-web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htmRiverQueen18https://www.blogger.com/profile/07179839025934363009noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-92068889153762341842011-04-16T20:26:19.692-04:002011-04-16T20:26:19.692-04:00The far left progressives are playing a game of Ca...The far left progressives are playing a game of Catch 22 with the election system.<br /><br />Before the election date of 2008 the Congress told people it is the state's job to vet the candidates. One court judge said it was up to Congress. Before the election date the courts said the case is moot because Obama may not win the election. Then after he won ... oops it's too late, he won the election. And then later of course in the infamous secret CRS Memo circulated secretly to members of Congress in April 2009, those lawyers said it is the responsibility of the states. Now that the states are doing something about this Catch 22 mess and gaming of the election and legal system by Obama and the progressives, now the far left progressives are saying ... nope it's not up to the states but up to the federal government to decide. Basically the bottom line of the far left progressives is that they don't want any rules or vetting. They want to let anyone run even if not a Citizen at all like the Socialist Party candidate Calero. The far left progressives want a pure democracy with no rules with 51% determining who the President and Commander of our Military is to be ... Constitution and fundamental law be damned from their point of view. A pure democracy is just a stepping stone to mob rule and that ultimately leads to a tyrannical nationalist socialist takeover to restore order. The is what the far left want. It's the end game of the Cloward-Piven Strategy. No rules, no Constitution except for what the few far left elite will dictate for the moment to suit their needs then change them 30 days later to suit that times need.<br /><br />Read this essay about out Cloward-Piven Government in which Obama is driving the country into the end game to throw out the Constitution and install a national socialist new government in response to the calls from the mob rule of 51% to end the misery that Obama and his Obots are creating.<br /><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/11/clowardpiven_government.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/11/clowardpiven_government.html</a><br /><br />CDR Kerchner (Ret)<br /><a href="http://www.protectourliberty.org" rel="nofollow">www.protectourliberty.org</a>puzo1moderatorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14344806874980130928noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-56641340709851304582011-04-16T12:49:13.056-04:002011-04-16T12:49:13.056-04:00Saw an interview on Fox last night with a reporter...Saw an interview on Fox last night with a reporter from Arizona. He says there's a 50-50 chance Brewer's gonna veto the bill.<br /><br />Somebody please tell me that's a joke.Zamashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00424280700180634359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-61419508144907093152011-04-16T08:02:10.427-04:002011-04-16T08:02:10.427-04:00Obama ran for public office. He put his life in t...Obama ran for public office. He put his life in the public spot light. He made statements that he was eligible to be POTUS. Members of Congress state he was vetted. Members of the Senate stated he was vetted. Judges from across this country state that he was vetted. At this point, the POTUS is a public figure, and is basing his right to hold office on nothing but other people saying he is qualified. <br /><br />He has no right to privacy. Hi. State Law has no right to deny anyone public documents of this nature. The right to privacy went out the door when Obama threw his has in for the election, and was certified when he held his hand up and swore an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America. At that point Obama's entire life became American History, which everyone in the USA has a right to know. There is no privacy rights for public figures of this nature. To claim so is obscene.jshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03556528525557443583noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-3705592385660082992011-04-15T21:59:35.556-04:002011-04-15T21:59:35.556-04:00I have just posted on my weblog at http://jesbeard...I have just posted on my weblog at http://jesbeard.com/?p=33 a detailed look at Hawaiian law regarding access to the state's birth records. Bottom line, they are available, not just to Obama but to ANYONE sharing a common ancestor. That reportedly includes Sara Palin and also Rush Limbaugh.<br /><br />jesbeard@usa.netjesbeardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11653801551104614590noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-47623184441475391542011-04-14T17:52:37.411-04:002011-04-14T17:52:37.411-04:00@Bridgett:
Mario's WordPress blog is a mirror...@Bridgett:<br /><br />Mario's WordPress blog is a mirror/backup site for this, his Google Blogger blog. Commenting is disabled on his WordPress backup blog. About once per month all posts and comments in this Google blogger blog are copied over to the WordPress blog which ... as I said ... serves as a back up site in case Google pulled the plug on this site. As you know Google is very, very friendly with Obama.<br /><br />Hope this explains and that you understand.<br /><br />CDR Kerchner (Ret)puzo1moderatorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14344806874980130928noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-58382649434293104902011-04-14T17:41:09.789-04:002011-04-14T17:41:09.789-04:00I tried to leave this comment on your blog, but it...I tried to leave this comment on your blog, but it says I don't own my Wordpress identity! I do, but somehow your blog doesn't recognize me. WP says I have to do something special so I will get recognized.(http://www.blogger.com/comment). <br /><br />Anyway, this is what I wrote.<br /><br />Great rebuttal re the NBC article. Unbelievable distortions of truth and facts by that so called "investigative" correspondent. Michael has No integrity and zero credibility. <br /><br />My Question: Recently, I've noticed that the term natural born citizen is being hyphenated. Does this change the meaning? FactCheck used it throughout their article rebutting Trump. Then today, I saw the hyphenated version in an article at WND. <br /><br />Natural Born Citizen vs. Natural-Born Citizen<br /><br />I remember reading once that it did, but am unable to find a citation about it. Using proper English, I know the difference, but I am looking at how it might affect the meaning legally. <br /><br />Would you please clarify on your blog or send a note to me as others are questioning this as well.<br /><br />Thanks,<br /><br />Bridgette<br />http://wtpotus.wordpress.comMario Apuzzo, Esq. https://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-59673200825161157942011-04-14T06:39:17.604-04:002011-04-14T06:39:17.604-04:00To support my remarks concerning the important iss...To support my remarks concerning the important issue that Obama seems to have used many different social security numbers that are not his, see "My first amended complaint in Taitz v Astrue was finally filed and docketted by the clerks of the US Disrict Court in DC, 3 weeks after I filed them and after the Chief judge, Hon Royce Lamberth, ordered them to be filed | Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire" at http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=20548 <br />This issue has the potential to be as big than Obama's avoidance at showing his long form birth certificate (if he has one)!!MichaelIsGreathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12020964848057963778noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-2606986739825647322011-04-14T06:33:01.044-04:002011-04-14T06:33:01.044-04:00There is another important issue that might even b...There is another important issue that might even be directly linked to Obama's birth (somewhere else than in the US!!) is the fact that Obama seems to have used several different social security numbers that are not his but other people's social security numbers!!<br /><br />It seems that several other documents that Obama does not want anyone to see (school records, applications to student loans, etc.) would seem to show that Obama does not only want to hide his long form birth certificate but that he also has several other areas of his life that he wants to hide!!<br /><br />Donald Trump is the only one who will be able to force the truth to come out for all to see about Obama's long form birth certificate and more.<br /><br />It would seem that Obama has hired his step-sister to influence the debate concerning this long form birth certificate! That proves again that Obama is really very worried that he might be forced to show his long form birth certificate.<br /><br />Very soon, a new book on this birth certificate issue will be available. It is:<br />Where's the Birth Certificate?: The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President [Hardcover] by Corsi Jerome (Author) at http://www.amazon.com/Wheres-Birth-Certificate-Eligible-President/dp/1936488299MichaelIsGreathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12020964848057963778noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-63499501900536726672011-04-14T05:51:19.596-04:002011-04-14T05:51:19.596-04:00Does anyone know how to contact Jack Maskell -The...Does anyone know how to contact Jack Maskell -The Congressional Research Service?<br />I read what he sent in his reportto Congress and he is WRONG when he said …<br />“As explained by the Supreme Court of the United States over the course of a number of years, it is well settled from common law Principles of jus soli (“law of the soil”) extant in England and the Colonies at the time of Independence, etc, etc”<br />The English common law referred to by the SCOTUS in Wong Kim Ark case, was with reference to Lord Coke’s report of Calvin’s case where Calvin was adjudged a ‘natural born subject’, Coke said….<br />Coke:<br />“There is found in the law four kinds of ligeances: the first is, ligeantia naturalis, absoluta, pura, et indefinita, and this originally is due by nature and birthright,”<br />i.e TWO qualities to make a natural born subject of the English sovereign, i.e. ‘nature & birthright’<br />Coke:<br />“Calvin the Plaintiff naturalized by procreation and birth right…”<br />Again, TWO qualities to make a ‘natural born subject’<br />Coke goes further to say that without the parent father (wives took the subject/citizenship status of the husband) being a subject/citizen, that the child is NOT A SUBJECT, even if born jus soli (in the land)<br />Coke:<br />“that issue is no subject to the King of England, though he be born upon his soyl, and under his meridian, for that he was not born under the ligeance of a subject…”<br />The chief justice in the SCOTUS Wong Kim Ark case, cherry picked that children of aliens born in England are considered ‘natural born subjects’ and ran with that, but the chief justice (Horace Gray – appointed by & beholding to the usurper Chester Arthur) failed to mention these statements (quoted here) of Lord Coke, which clearly show that it was jus soli (born in the land) AND jus sanguinis (born of the parent) that was required to make a ‘natural born subject’.<br />In England, an alien visiting England, was considered a ‘subject’, and if he was not considered a subject, then a child born of that alien, even if born in England was NOT born a subject.<br />As you can see Jack Maskell has been misled by relying on the error of others to form his erroneous opinion and subsequently he ill advises the Congress.<br />According to the English common law it took TWO qualities to make a natural born subject.<br />Not one! …………. not only jus soli!<br />Both jus soli and jus sanguinis (born in the land to citizen parents) is what was required.<br />It is important to contact Jack Maskell and get him to offer his explanation as to what Coke meant by the statements that I have quoted here.<br />It would be good to have his written response.<br />I have already put this to other legal authorities, many failed to respond, but one who did, acknowledged that there is a problem with the way the English common law has be misrepresented over the years.MichaelNhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05590753165515194315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-61941739261030427442011-04-14T01:24:09.722-04:002011-04-14T01:24:09.722-04:00Bill O'Reilly told a big fat whopper and piece...Bill O'Reilly told a big fat whopper and piece of disinformation on the ending segment of his TV show tonight when he said in answer to an email comment about Obama having a SSN from CT, O'Reilly then said that Obama's father lived for several years in CT and probably got it for his son. When that CT number was issues circa Mar 1977 Obama's father was back in Kenya for many years and Obama was age 15 living in Hawaii in the legal custody of his maternal grandparents. There is no way Obama Sr. in Kenya could have requested a SSN for Obama Jr. living in Hawaii and got issued a CT SSN. It also should be pointed out that Harvard which is the New England college Obama Sr. attended for a few years in the early 1960s before returning to Kenya is in Massachusetts, not Connecticut. So O'Reilly is either completely stupid or he is purposely putting out false information to protect Obama. Is O'Reilly dancing to the tune or Obama's Homeland Security Department warnings and disinformation to keep Obama's usurpation a national security secret with fear of violence threats if Obama's fraud is exposed or is O'Reilly simply a closet progressive and Obama's lapdog?<br /><br />Listen to this audio interview of Susan Daniels, Licensed Private Investigator, of the great state of Ohio at about 18 minutes and 25 seconds in where she destroys the above false story that O'Reilly repeated tonight. Listen to the entire audio if you have time. It's 34 minutes full of good, solid information on the Obama fraudulent use of a CT SSN.<br /><a href="http://www.t-room.us/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/SDInterview.mp3" rel="nofollow">http://www.t-room.us/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/SDInterview.mp3</a><br /><br />CDR Kerchner (Ret)<br /><a href="http://www.protectourliberty.org" rel="nofollow">www.protectourliberty.org</a>puzo1moderatorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14344806874980130928noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-80026269302205239192011-04-14T00:53:06.785-04:002011-04-14T00:53:06.785-04:00Deconstructing FactCheck.org's Trump Smear Job...<a href="http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/13/birthers-correct-false-claims-against-trump/" rel="nofollow">Deconstructing</a> FactCheck.org's Trump Smear Job.bdwilcoxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03723935463347132039noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-60680884397866434342011-04-14T00:41:48.177-04:002011-04-14T00:41:48.177-04:00@MichaelN
Yes, I have and much, much more. The D...@MichaelN<br /><br />Yes, I have and much, much more. The Donald and his key advisor and lawyer Michael Cohen have all they need and more, including the SSN felony fraud and the back dated Selective Service Registration felony fraud. Things are going to be might warm in the Oval Office shortly. The walls of truth are closing in on the grifter/usurper in chief. And not just from Mr. Trump. Multiple powerful forces will be exposing the Obama ineligibility issue. You heard it hear first. <br /><br />CDR Kerchner (Ret)<br /><a href="http://www.protectourliberty.org" rel="nofollow">www.protectourliberty.org</a>puzo1moderatorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14344806874980130928noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-42971609454488182122011-04-13T22:41:24.950-04:002011-04-13T22:41:24.950-04:00Charles.
I presume you have sent this to TrumpCharles.<br /><br />I presume you have sent this to TrumpMichaelNhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05590753165515194315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-44674237102119037952011-04-13T19:19:11.629-04:002011-04-13T19:19:11.629-04:00I count 39 republicans in the AZ house. If they n...I count 39 republicans in the AZ house. If they need 31 votes to pass the eligibility law, it would seem a favorable number. Does anyone have an idea of whether the republicans will support the bill en masse? I must assume that the dems will vote no, but is there any reason to believe that there are enough republican defectors to kill this?Zamashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00424280700180634359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-32713859820349262962011-04-13T18:19:18.230-04:002011-04-13T18:19:18.230-04:00New information on the Obama SSN fraud!
An Excell...New information on the Obama SSN fraud!<br /><br />An Excellent Audio Interview Link at this site to Susan Daniels, Private Investigator, explaining Her Research into Obama using Someone Else's SSN. Read the text and then click on the interview link to hear the one hour interview of Susan Daniels, PI. Very, very interesting showing the widespread and lengthy identity theft of someone else's Social Security Number going back as early as 1986 by Obama, the usurper-in-chief. She also explains how she believes the Selective Service Registration was falsely filed using that SSN and was back dated to 1980, but that the falsely file backdated SSS registration likely occurred in the last half of 2007 or in 2008. Some new information in this interview. Recommended listening to all interested in the Obama SSN felony caper. When will Congress investigate. This criminal activity directly by Obama makes the Nixon association with the Watergate operatives break-in look like tiddlywinks.<br /><br />IT'S THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER STUPID! | T-Room<br /><a href="http://www.t-room.us/2011/04/its-the-social-security-number-stupid/" rel="nofollow">http://www.t-room.us/2011/04/its-the-social-security-number-stupid/</a><br /><br /><br />CDR Kerchner (Ret)<br /><a href="http://www.protectourliberty.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.protectourliberty.org</a><br />###puzo1moderatorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14344806874980130928noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-29486637734154407932011-04-13T16:37:28.622-04:002011-04-13T16:37:28.622-04:00Obama's PLACE of birth while of some importanc...Obama's PLACE of birth while of some importance pales in comparison to his DUAL citizenship at birth. As we all know, the latter is because his father was never a U.S. citizen, and Obama admits it. Our continued energy expended in finding Obama's original birth certificate, however, is not only a distraction it makes us an easy object of ridicule. <br /><br />If we do find his birth cert, well fine, but lets please move the cert search way to the back shelf and bring the reality of his DUAL citizenship front and center. His DUAL citizenship has been a very well kept "secret" as it has never been the topic of ANY media coverage. Nevertheless, it is a fact and it is EASY for most Americans to immediately comprehend its importance. <br /><br />Thank you for considering my views.<br />RobareUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00735906587373724399noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-56322908584608348802011-04-13T15:22:36.526-04:002011-04-13T15:22:36.526-04:00Mario,
Can you create a status update on the state...Mario,<br />Can you create a status update on the state eligiblity bills?<br /><br />You should also think about putting a post up promoting Dr. Corsi's book "Where's The Birth Certificate?" The ranking of the book is very high and we are just over a month before publication. I think you probably want to check with Dr. Corsi before you put any post.Jameshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01793622722554168489noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-25594905794668223242011-04-13T15:19:45.267-04:002011-04-13T15:19:45.267-04:00Update on progress of state presidential certifica...Update on progress of state presidential certification bills<br />Posted on | April 13, 2011 | No Comments<br /><br />Arizona state presidential eligibility certification bill passed all the committees and full vote in the senate, it moves to the full vote of the house and signature of the governor next week.<br /><br />I got a phone call from Lyle Rowland, sponsor of the presidential eligibility certification bill in Missouri.The bill finally passed the committees and is going to a full vote of the house this week or next week. Demand that your state representatives and senators vote for the bill.<br /><br />I got a phone call from Leo Berman, Texas state senator, sponsor of the presidential eligibility certification bill in TX. Mr. Berman is extremely upset with members of the committee refusing to vote on the bill. They just seat on it, while they know that majority of of the state representatives and senators are willing to vote for it. Call each and every committee member and demand scheduling of the bill for vote tomorrow, immediate passing of the bill. Demand answers, whether committee members received some consideration or were intimidated into not bringing thebill to a vote. Call public integrity of unit of the office of the TX Attorney General Greg Abbott and demand immediate investigation, whether committee members received any considaration or were intimidated into not bringing this bill to a vote.<br /><br />We need the same investigation in each state.<br /><br />As the sessions are ending we need all the bill out of committees as original bills or striker bills this week or next week<br /><br />RE: AZ ELIGIBILITY BILL PASSES IN SENATE!!!!!!!!!!<br />InboxX<br /><br /> Reply |Jeff LICHTER<br />show details 10:55 AM (7 minutes ago)<br /><br />fromJeff LICHTER<br />to<br />dateWed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:55 AM<br />subjectRE: AZ ELIGIBILITY BILL PASSES IN SENATE!!!!!!!!!!<br />mailed-bymsn.com<br /><br />hide details 10:55 AM (7 minutes ago)<br /><br />Most of you know, we have been working on his bill for two years. Passed with 21 of 30 votes today in Senate. On to the House next week where we need 31 votes to pass<br />it and if it makes that, final step is on on to Gov. Brewer for signature.<br /> <br />FOR THOSE OF YOU IN ARIZONA, PLEASE HELP BY CALLING ARIZONA HOUSE REPS AND EXPRESS YOUR SUPPORT FOR THE BILL. MAKE SURE THE SECRETARYS TAKING THE CALLS SAY THEY WILL PASS YOUR SENTIMENTS ON ON TO THE REP. YOU CAN GET THEIR NAMES AND PHONE NUMBERS AT www.azhouse.gov<br /> <br />Thanks, JeffJameshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01793622722554168489noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-44415039875925949082011-04-13T14:29:28.565-04:002011-04-13T14:29:28.565-04:00Breaking News ... via the grapevine ... more news ...Breaking News ... via the grapevine ... more news to follow<br /><br />HB 2177 ELIGIBILITY BILL IS PASSED BY AZ STATE SENATE! 21 YES VOTES! (We were hoping for 18) BILL MOVES ON TO HOUSE VOTE NEXT WEEK!<br /><br />CDR Kerchner (Ret)<br /><a href="http://www.protectourliberty.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.protectourliberty.org</a>puzo1moderatorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14344806874980130928noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-61289705947973672532011-04-12T23:48:52.546-04:002011-04-12T23:48:52.546-04:00If what Fukino says is true, that must one big fil...If what Fukino says is true, that must one big file cabinet. There must be millions and millions of birth records stored there. It would take a warehouse to store them all.Jameshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01793622722554168489noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-79552504774373264502011-04-12T21:23:41.785-04:002011-04-12T21:23:41.785-04:00Isikoff quotes Fukino as saying that the original ...Isikoff quotes Fukino as saying that the original long-form birth certificate is located in a bound volume in a file cabinet on the first floor of the state Dept. of Health. Is this where all of the original birth certificates are kept? I doubt it. In fact, if I remember correctly, people were saying a year or so ago that all of the paper birth certificates were destroyed. They were scanned into digital storage as digital images.<br /><br />It seems clear to me that someone filled out the paperwork to get a birth certificate for Obama but they did not include enough documentation to fulfill the requirements for an official birth certificate to be accepted by the state. This "record of live birth" that is in the file cabinet is just the incomplete paperwork. That is why the COLB says "Date Filed By Registrar" instead of "Date Accepted By State Registrar."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-26942622640002504962011-04-12T18:00:01.494-04:002011-04-12T18:00:01.494-04:00In Re: Mario’s analysis of the Ishikoff article:
...In Re: Mario’s analysis of the Ishikoff article:<br /><br />Long form birth certificates for my children indicate that the certificates were issued by: 1. State of Texas and 2. State of New Mexico.<br /><br />While there are numerous claims that Obama’s original long form birth certificate is on file and has been seen, one question remains that has not been addressed:<br /><br />Was it issued by the State of Hawaii?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-64944186765349805792011-04-12T17:04:45.536-04:002011-04-12T17:04:45.536-04:00Looks like Hawaii's taking one for team Obama ...<a href="http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/12/breaking-from-hawaii-no-more-long-form-birth-certificates/" rel="nofollow">Looks like</a> Hawaii's taking one for team Obama again.<br /><br />After Trump challenged Obama to show his long form birth certificate, former director of Hawaii's Department of Health Fukino stated you couldn't obtain one. When Miki Booth proved you most certainly still could, ALL OF A SUDDEN Hawaii does a 180 and no longer offers copies of long forms! Coincidence? Total, I'm sure.<br /><br />This brings up a very salient question. How would a FORMER director of Hawaii's Department of Health (Fukino) obtain such inside information if she wasn't still inside? The answer is obvious. She's an operative and they're still using her to triangulate strategy.bdwilcoxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03723935463347132039noreply@blogger.com