tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post6669426116521758711..comments2024-03-02T14:24:03.076-05:00Comments on Natural Born Citizen - A Place to Ask Questions and Get the Right Answers: The States Have a Right and Duty to Assure Their Citizens That a Presidential Candidate Is an Article II “Natural Born Citizen"Mario Apuzzo, Esq. http://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-60843739267079737412011-03-06T08:22:34.517-05:002011-03-06T08:22:34.517-05:00Mario, and anyone else interested, I have put toge...Mario, and anyone else interested, I have put together my view of the situation on a blog page. It is without supporting links as yet but I think you will find it correct on all points. <br />a-pens-nk.blogspot.com/2011/03/natural-usurpation.htmlA penhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06519441140048530323noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-32181690047873796722011-03-04T20:50:53.043-05:002011-03-04T20:50:53.043-05:00Illinois State Senator Obama admits childhood in K...Illinois State Senator Obama admits childhood in Kenya<br /><br />http://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2011/03/05/illinois-state-senator-obama-admits-childhood-in-kenya/Mario Apuzzo, Esq. https://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-80236778533202957702011-03-03T20:35:36.373-05:002011-03-03T20:35:36.373-05:00Mario,
You should send your research, advocacy, a...Mario,<br /><br />You should send your research, advocacy, and support to the following indivduals:<br /><br />http://www1.legis.ga.gov/legis/2009_10/house/bios/hatfieldMark/hatfieldMark.htm<br /><br />Mark Hatfield -Author to Georgia Birther Bill<br />mhatfield@wayxcable.com<br />http://www.house.state.tx.us/members/member-page/?district=6<br />Leo Berman - Author of the Texas Birther Bill<br />http://www.capitol.tn.gov/senate/members/s17.html<br />Senator Mae Beavers - Author of the Tennesse Birther BillJameshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01793622722554168489noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-67696732224583131772011-03-03T17:21:40.514-05:002011-03-03T17:21:40.514-05:00http://obamasgarden.wordpress.com/2011/03/03/proof...http://obamasgarden.wordpress.com/2011/03/03/proof-it-was-in-front-of-our-faces/<br /><br />PROOF there is no BC in Hawaii.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-9197241973159649752011-03-03T15:18:27.483-05:002011-03-03T15:18:27.483-05:00What does God think? --
Well, Moses, Jesus, and ...What does God think? -- <br /><br />Well, Moses, Jesus, and Paul all addressed the matter of 'natural-born Citizen!' -- both in the negative, and in the positive.<br /><br />Latin --<br />'Alienigena' (Latin), used in Leviticus 22:10 (Vulgate), ‘foreign-born, stranger, outsider;’<br />Compare to Greek, 'allegenes,' ‘other race,’ used by Jesus to refer to the ‘Samaritan leper’ as a ‘foreigner, outsider’ (in Luke 17:18).<br /><br />Antonym: 'Indigena' (Latin) is used in Leviticus 16:29 (Vulgate), ‘domestic-born,’ or ‘home-born,’ or ‘native-born.’<br /><br />In Acts 22:27 (NASB) -- The commander came and said to him, "Tell me, are you a Roman?" And he said, "Yes." 28 The commander answered, "I acquired this citizenship with a large sum of money." And Paul said, "But I was actually born a citizen."Bobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12433349430390224035noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-88324571082469847452011-03-03T14:20:23.470-05:002011-03-03T14:20:23.470-05:00On might ask what is God’s and the Laws of Nature’...On might ask what is God’s and the Laws of Nature’s connection to defining a “natural born Citizen?” The Founders and Framers believed in God. They also believed that God gave mankind natural law. They believed that they had a right to assume “among the Powers of the Earth, the separate and equal Station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle[d] them.” The Declaration of Independence, para. 1. They also knew that natural law when applied to nations became the law of nations. Emer de Vattel, The Law of Nations (London 1797) (1st ed. Neuchatel 1758). The Founders and Framers were greatly influenced in their rationale for the revolution and in writing the Constitution by Vattel. Where would they then find their definition of a “natural born Citizen?” Of course, they found it in natural law and the law of nations, all passed down to them by God, and as explained to them by Vattel who told them in Section 212 of The Law of Nations that the “citizens are the members of the civil society: bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. . .”Mario Apuzzo, Esq. https://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-74807658459505953672011-03-03T13:23:31.300-05:002011-03-03T13:23:31.300-05:00Texoma,
One of the central issues in the 1824 ca...Texoma, <br /><br />One of the central issues in the 1824 case of McCreery's Lessee v. Somerville, 22 U.S. 3549, 9 Wheat. 354 (1824), presented by Justice Story, was not, although it should have been, the citizenship status of the three U.S.-born children of the alien, Ralph M’Creery. Their citizenship status was critical to whether they held good title to land they claimed they inherit from their U.S. citizen deceased uncle in Maryland, for at common law "no person can claim lands by descent through an alien, since he has no inheritable blood." Id. Also, the British statutes that Justice Story applied in an attempt to abrogate the Maryland common law, statute of 11 and 12 Wm. III.ch.6 and 25 Geo. II.ch.39, only benefited someone if he or she were "the King's natural born subject or subjects." But Justice Story quickly glossed over the issue of the citizenship status of the three U.S.-born girls. Justice Story just simply declared them to be “native born citizens of the United States” without any analysis or discussion. Justice Story told us neither when the nieces were born nor the place in the U.S. of their birth. He also did not tell us how he concluded the nieces were “native born citizens of the United States.” Given the probable ages of the two M'Creery brothers and William M'Creery's death in 1814, the nieces were most likely born after July 4, 1776. For example, if Ralph M'Creery was 40 when his brother died in 1814, and he had a daughter when he was 20, she would have been born in 1794. Hence, Justice Story's reference to the three children born in the U.S. to alien parents being “native born citizens of the United States” does not tell us much to go by. <br /><br />That Justice Story neither discussed nor analyzed the particulars of the citizenship status of the three nieces is important, however, in light of the fact that just 6 years later, in 1830, the U.S. Supreme Court came out differently on this issue in Inglis v. Sailors’ Snug Harbor, 28 U.S. 99, 3 Pet. 99 (1830), where the exact status of a person’s citizenship was central to the Court’s decision and where a majority of the Court accepted the natural law and law of nations jus sanguinis basis for citizenship and did not adopt Justice Story’s English common law jus soli view. Please note that under one scenario considered by the Court, the child in the Inglis case was assumed to be born after July 4, 1776 and before September 15, 1776, the latter date being when the British temporarily took possession of New York. The Inglis majority said that that child, even though born in New York after July 4, 1776, was an alien because her parents were British "natural born subjects." <br /><br />Hence, under the majority decision in Inglis (which included Chief Justice John Marshall), the three M'Creery girls, even if born in the U.S. after July 4, 1776, because they were born to alien parents, would have been aliens and not "native born citizens of the United States." As I also explained, Justice Story, in the minority in Inglis, also had argued that a child born on U.S. soil to alien parents was an "American citizen." The majority of the Court rejected his position. Because the Inglis case came after the M'Creery's lessee case, the Inglis case would have controlled any future status of such children.Mario Apuzzo, Esq. https://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-11507873373003458932011-03-03T13:23:03.554-05:002011-03-03T13:23:03.554-05:00Let us move forward,
Excellent recommendation. ...Let us move forward, <br /><br />Excellent recommendation. All persons throughout the United States interested in bringing the Obama eligibility issue to justice should be looking into the exact point that you have raised so that they can prepare themselves for a challenge to Obama being placed on any State ballot. <br /><br />It would be great for someone to organize a nationwide campaign to accomplish this.Mario Apuzzo, Esq. https://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-5479548860657708462011-03-03T11:00:08.465-05:002011-03-03T11:00:08.465-05:00The primary elections may be the most appropriate ...The primary elections may be the most appropriate time for an eligibility challenge. Find out the rules for a potential primary ballot/caucus candidate: when he/she must file and how long you would have to challenge his/her eligibility. The challenges would be made to the State Secretary of State.Let us move forwardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01549100708314458011noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-27850283470436055362011-03-03T09:52:18.994-05:002011-03-03T09:52:18.994-05:00MissTickly says: "The proof was in front of o...MissTickly says: <a href="http://obamasgarden.wordpress.com/2011/03/03/proof-it-was-in-front-of-our-faces/" rel="nofollow">"The proof was in front of our faces the whole time."</a>bdwilcoxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03723935463347132039noreply@blogger.com