tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post7408699433373135530..comments2024-03-02T14:24:03.076-05:00Comments on Natural Born Citizen - A Place to Ask Questions and Get the Right Answers: On Obama’s Eligibility to be President, Who Is Protecting the Constitution and the Nation, the “Birthers” or Obama and His Enablers?Mario Apuzzo, Esq. http://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181noreply@blogger.comBlogger22125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-53003472356476678972010-06-10T16:58:50.398-04:002010-06-10T16:58:50.398-04:00That is a smoking gun then. Adams should be depose...That is a smoking gun then. Adams should be deposed. The real problem is the courts stonewalling the issue. I guess they think it is all fun and games until somebody loses an eye.A penhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06519441140048530323noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-2599933736496356202010-06-10T15:36:57.339-04:002010-06-10T15:36:57.339-04:00Hawaii Confirms Tim Adams Was 'Senior Election...Hawaii Confirms Tim Adams Was 'Senior Elections Clerk' in the 2008 Election. Tim Adams is also a Hillary Clinton Supporter! Tim Adams says Obama was not born in Hawaii and that people in the Hawaii elections office and his bosses there knew it in 2008! | Birther Report: Obama Release Your Records<br /><br /><a href="http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/06/hawaii-confirms-tim-adams-was-senior.html" rel="nofollow">http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/06/hawaii-confirms-tim-adams-was-senior.html</a><br /><br /><a href="http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/06/purported-former-chief-elections-clerk.html" rel="nofollow">http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/06/purported-former-chief-elections-clerk.html</a><br /><br />CDR Kerchnercfkerchnerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02941086863044892649noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-38533551431959280502010-06-08T22:56:08.182-04:002010-06-08T22:56:08.182-04:00Read John Yinger on pg 28 of the pdf. This is what...Read John Yinger on pg 28 of the pdf. This is what we are suffering, his ignorance.<br /><br />http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_senate_hearings&docid=f:96813.wais<br /><br />The entire document is an insult.A penhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06519441140048530323noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-32202630875493025862010-06-08T22:39:37.437-04:002010-06-08T22:39:37.437-04:00Somebody needs to interview this man, Tim Adams. h...Somebody needs to interview this man, Tim Adams. http://island-adv.com/2010/06/tim-adams-chief-elections-clerk-exposes-obama-birth-certificate-scandal/A penhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06519441140048530323noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-73283186063507013332010-06-07T00:53:19.078-04:002010-06-07T00:53:19.078-04:00A fellow blogger
http://forums.hannity.com/showpo...A fellow blogger <br />http://forums.hannity.com/showpost.php?p=74560271&postcount=25065<br /><br />discovered that someone checked into the alignment of the Hawaiian birth announcements, and found that the listing order at the time of Barack Obama's birth announcement appeared to be suspiciously over-aligned.<br /><br />http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/extra-extra-announcing-obamas-birth/<br /><br />http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/06/06/graphs-and-stats/<br /><br />Has anyone any actual original copies of the Hawaiian papers, or are they all microfisched and/or electronically entered (hence subject to Orwellian newspeak manipulation) only (such as by zealot geeks to the DNC and Communist-Socialist cause)?Brianroyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06460377944201908161noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-79304898575938203522010-06-06T17:44:01.966-04:002010-06-06T17:44:01.966-04:00Mario must add this to the court case. More solid...Mario must add this to the court case. More solid evidence against Obama. Amazing detective work.<br /><br />http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/06/06/graphs-and-stats/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-54242775218281397592010-06-03T20:35:50.714-04:002010-06-03T20:35:50.714-04:00It is truly a national disgrace that all three bra...It is truly a national disgrace that all three branches of government have blindly accepted Obama's online digital summary (Certification of Live Birth) of his 1961 birth record as the only evidence needed to establish Article II eligibility.Roberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00506386638130850542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-54614351398850651142010-06-03T14:07:39.996-04:002010-06-03T14:07:39.996-04:00An accurate link to the Wilson 'quote' has...An accurate link to the Wilson 'quote' has been, subsequently, posted by "constitutionallyspeaking" There,in the "Congressional Globe", it appears in its more complete form :<br /> "We must depend on the general law relating to subjects & citizens RECOGNIZED BY ALL NATIONS FOR A DEFINITION and that must lead us to the conclusion that every person born in the United States is a natural-born citizen of such States, EXCEPT it may be that children born on our soil to temporary sojourners or representatives of foreign Governments, are native-born citizens of the United States"<br />Note Wilson's citation of Rawle("a writer on the Constitution") & additional commentary re that particular writer's dispositionUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17610711716546008661noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-73983561612001105732010-06-02T22:43:41.958-04:002010-06-02T22:43:41.958-04:00OOPS, Sorry
http://rs6.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?col...OOPS, Sorry<br /><br />http://rs6.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=071/llcg071.db&recNum=156Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-61591695348728436192010-06-02T22:32:46.718-04:002010-06-02T22:32:46.718-04:00Mario, the Wilson quote is from March 1, 1866 Hous...Mario, the Wilson quote is from March 1, 1866 House debate on rights of citizens beginning on page 1115. The specific quote is on page 1117, 1st column 1/2 way down.<br /><br />http://rs6.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampageAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-15266160186863872152010-06-02T18:23:38.970-04:002010-06-02T18:23:38.970-04:00avodlp,
Can you provide for our readers a source...avodlp, <br /><br />Can you provide for our readers a source link to the quote of James F. Wilson.Mario Apuzzo, Esq. https://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-41852901714353046442010-06-02T11:45:28.084-04:002010-06-02T11:45:28.084-04:00Mario Apuzzo & Charles Kerchner:
I'll be ...Mario Apuzzo & Charles Kerchner:<br /><br />I'll be listening to Dr. Kate's show with the two of you this evening at 9:00 pm Eastern. Break a leg!!<br /><br />Link here:<br /><br />http://www.blogtalkradio.com/drkate/2010/06/03/revolution-radio-obamas-constititional-disabilityjayjayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09845961766550552240noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-64146662665797423002010-06-02T11:28:51.823-04:002010-06-02T11:28:51.823-04:00House Judiciary Committee Chairman ~ James F. Wils...House Judiciary Committee Chairman ~ James F. Wilson March 1866<br />"We must depend on the general law relating to subjects & citizens RECOGNIZED BY ALL NATIONS FOR A DEFINITION and that must lead us to the conclusion that every person born in the United States is a natural-born citizen of such States, EXCEPT....children born on our soil to temporary sojourners or representatives of foreign Governments."<br /><br />B.Obama Sr - sojourner, personified, in this nation<br /><br />sojourn-to stay or reside temporarilyUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17610711716546008661noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-82152781405478096362010-06-02T08:29:27.521-04:002010-06-02T08:29:27.521-04:00The question asked should not be, "whom is a ...The question asked should not be, "whom is a citizen at birth?" like the enablers want to frame it. <br />The question should be "whom is a citizen at birth, and not a citizen of any other foreign power?" A Natural Born Citizen, of course.Mickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02864660386925998491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-20918348122613202712010-06-01T23:49:59.269-04:002010-06-01T23:49:59.269-04:00My question on the matter is this, When a matter i...My question on the matter is this, When a matter is obviously simple to deduce then what is the courts purpose, reaffirmation? <br /><br />I'll put it another way, when there is an intruder in your house do you need to ask a judge if he is an intruder ? It seems to me that some things are just simply so obvious that there is no need to seek affirmation. One of those things is the reality that the definition of NBC is given by Vattel and no where else thus making it a fact. Given the "Law of Nations" is even given as congress' reference source as well, for crimes of certain natures where foreign policy must be considered as in citizens and their nations, it further solidifies that fact. Now, that the fact is indisputable to ordinary people, I'm not a lawyer so this fact being quite obvious to me seems rational to assume that my peers also agree, which they ALL do, that the only reason one would dispute it is because there is nothing else between guilt and punishment but the confession and they simply don't have the guts. Just like the intruder that you catch, if asked what he is doing in your home the answer won't be "because I broke in". <br /><br />Some folks who are unable to resist must suffer the will of the intruder no matter what it is. Some folks don't hesitate beyond discovery before they act. I'm wondering what a court has to do with any of it other than to give the intruder a chance to get away with his life, or yours.A penhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06519441140048530323noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-61909181067517810112010-06-01T20:11:11.249-04:002010-06-01T20:11:11.249-04:00I think a good question to start with the Obots is...I think a good question to start with the Obots is, "Why was the term 'natural born Citizen' originally put into Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 and no where else in the Constitution and for no other office"? (Added for the VP later by constitutional amendment) If one must engage an Obot in debate, I think that is a good question to start with.<br /><br />The answer is clearly stated in this summer of 1787 letter from John Jay to George Washington. But, if one has to debate the propagandists, it is interesting to hear the Obots answer to that question as the starting place in any debate.<br /><a href="http://www.kerchner.com/images/protectourliberty/johnjay1787lettertogeorgewashington.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.kerchner.com/images/protectourliberty/johnjay1787lettertogeorgewashington.jpg</a><br /><br />Read the sentence Jay wrote with the key phrase "strong check" in it. How does one get the strongest check at birth from foreign influence on a child via birth status in order to guarantee sole claim and allegiance by birth of a child from only one country?<br /><br />And for further ammunition, Attorney Apuzzo's excellent essay on unity of citizenship and sole allegiance at birth is a good reference source (and the Euler diagram graphic) which shows that the Vattel definition of "natural born Citizenship" provides the STRONGEST CHECK against "foreign influence" at the birth of a child:<br /><a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/article-ii-natural-born-citizen-means.html" rel="nofollow">http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/article-ii-natural-born-citizen-means.html</a><br /><br />We in this blog know the answer. But we must educate may millions more if we are going to remove the usurper and prevent others from trying Obama's grifter path to the White House again.<br /><br />CDR Kerchner<br /><a href="http://www.protectourliberty.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.protectourliberty.org</a><br />####cfkerchnerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02941086863044892649noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-1749596836815258162010-06-01T18:50:04.163-04:002010-06-01T18:50:04.163-04:00The enablers love to frame the question.
It goes ...The enablers love to frame the question.<br /> It goes like this. "Who is a Natural Born Citizen? There is only 2 types of citizens described in the 14th Amendment, those Born and those Naturalized (totally ignoring the fact that there is indeed 3 types--A1S2C4,5).<br />So it only goes to reason that NBCs are those Born a US Citizen, and the USC Code describes a number of different types of "born" citizens, filling in the blank space of non definition of the term in the USC. (But of course those born in foreign countries of 1 US Citizen parent could not possibly fulfill the security requirement of A2S1C5, but don't let that leap of logic stop them).<br />It all goes back to Horace Gray and his purposeful blurring of the jurisdictional clause in 1898. Liberals have used WKA to increase there base and damage US Citizen sovereignty for 112 years.<br />Now there are rumblings (from Az.) that children of illegal aliens should not be given birthright citizenship. This is getting very close to the crux of the issue that has allowed Obama to usurp the office----Allegiance (jurisdiction).<br />Children of aliens can have US citizenship if A) their parents gain US Citizenship during the child's majority or B)The parents become legal resident aliens and the child chooses US Citizenship (ONLY) at the time of majority.<br />This is Natural Law, this is common sense.<br />Obama's enablers constantly tell us that what we see before our eyes is not what we actually see. How long can this go on? Why are we not marching on Washington, demanding that Obama prove his eligibilty (we know he can't)?Mickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02864660386925998491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-56214832613626730652010-06-01T17:19:39.845-04:002010-06-01T17:19:39.845-04:00Your quotes concerning unconstitutional 'amend...Your quotes concerning unconstitutional 'amendment' and 'revision' of the constitution are on point.<br /><br />I particularly appreciated the John Marshall quote obligating the courts to address alleged violations of the constitution; their refusal to do so being 'treasonous.'<br /><br />In the Barnett v Obama case, a Perkins, Coie plant as clerk to Judge Carter cited Ashwander v TVA, totally misinterpreting it. <br /><br />Ashwander held that when a case could be decided on statute or general law, the constitutional issue was secondary. <br /><br />However, there is no statute defining ‘natural born citizen,’ and case law vaguely mentions natural born citizen in regards to naturalization law, not to Article II of the constitution. <br /><br />Therefore, the Carter court had subject matter jurisdiction.<br /><br />Article II of the Constitution is the only U.S. law that relies on the term of art, 'natural born citizen.' <br /><br />There is no definitive case law (Liacakos, nor Wong Kim Ark define Natural Born Citizen) supporting the current misinterpretation of a native-born citizen being equal to a natural born one.<br /><br />Therefore, when a question of presidential eligibility is tabled, a congressman's definition of ‘natural born citizen,’ or a court to rely on dicta to adduce its meaning is an unconstitutional revision of Article II.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-41044367813129098892010-06-01T13:36:02.384-04:002010-06-01T13:36:02.384-04:00Magnus (https://me.yahoo.com/a/s_vuK4InvPm6AWDUcXu...Magnus (https://me.yahoo.com/a/s_vuK4InvPm6AWDUcXuP0aht7F5j) has left a new comment on your post "On Obama’s Eligibility to be President, Who Is Pro...":<br /><br />"Who is protecting the Constitution and the Nation, the “birthers” or Obama and his enablers?"<br /><br />It is anyway not the stinking Obama and his rotten enablers, [editor's delition] included.Mario Apuzzo, Esq. https://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-2873964356971867992010-06-01T11:34:32.225-04:002010-06-01T11:34:32.225-04:00As your post makes abundanly clear, it AIN'T O...As your post makes abundanly clear, it AIN'T Obama and His Enablers.<br /><br />They are more than happy to see a man who has never shown himself to be legally eligible to hold the office he now occupies actually remain in that office, usurping it and helping further the destruction of the United States Constitution.<br /><br />Actually, Obama's whole life seems to be nothing but a work of fiction. The man has never shown himself to be Constitutionally eligible.<br /><br />If you'd like to see something from a different point of view, watch the two short videos below which, even though they start slowly and have a bit of fun, contain a wealth of factual data - more than we've seen from Obama.<br /><br />In fact in the second video a famous senator is quoted speaking about someone that sounds for all the world like "Our Boy" and really strikes a chord.<br /><br />Only thing is the senator was the Roman named Cicero speaking in 42 BC - but the message is still very directed and pertinent for all of us:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsX5DzZHkIU" rel="nofollow">Three Little Words</a><br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNGG8tIJNMY" rel="nofollow">Merry Christmas OmeriKa!!</a>jayjayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09845961766550552240noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-31728495107485833442010-06-01T11:13:26.307-04:002010-06-01T11:13:26.307-04:00AND they confuse the American public with sole emp...AND they confuse the American public with sole emphasis of place of birth and rule out parentage as critical to natural born citizen status.Increduloushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10387112256966709689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-89284139999381707932010-06-01T09:49:21.996-04:002010-06-01T09:49:21.996-04:00It certainly isn't the court system.It certainly isn't the court system.A penhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06519441140048530323noreply@blogger.com