tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post7291656865631054322..comments2024-03-02T14:24:03.076-05:00Comments on Natural Born Citizen - A Place to Ask Questions and Get the Right Answers: Article II "Natural Born Citizen" Means Unity of Citizenship and Sole Allegiance At BirthMario Apuzzo, Esq. http://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-62415172684973955082010-11-20T09:54:21.626-05:002010-11-20T09:54:21.626-05:00I did send an email to Texas Representative Leo Be...I did send an email to Texas Representative Leo Berman regarding his bill.<br /><br />He was kind enough to acknolwedge its receipt and thank me for the information.<br /><br />I live in Arizona, and I rarely get replies when I write my representatives.Doubleehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09894977171356099262noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-72676374751051027012010-11-19T09:57:07.680-05:002010-11-19T09:57:07.680-05:00World Net Daily has an article entitled "Stat...World Net Daily has an article entitled "State GOP leaders grab issue of Obama eligibility."<br /><br />Texas Representative Leo Berman is sponsoring bill H. R. 295 that says the following:<br /><br /><i>The secretary of state may not certify the name of a candidate for president or vice-president unless the candidate has presented the candidate's original birth certificate indicating that the person is a natural-born United States citizen.</i><br /><br />How do we get through to the legislators who think birth on U.S. is sufficient to make one a natural born citizen?<br /><br />My sense is that the majority of legislators are unaware of the putative definition of natural born citizen that you have documented so well. I would like to be proven wrong.<br /><br />Of course, WND is part of the problem with their bill boards that focus on the birth certificate.Doubleehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09894977171356099262noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-79174788602529754612010-11-19T09:29:07.426-05:002010-11-19T09:29:07.426-05:00Your clearest argument yet -- WOW!
Those who want...Your clearest argument yet -- WOW!<br /><br />Those who want to mingle Blackstone and Vattel should remember this distinction --<br /><br />Blackstone's 'natural born' was describing who were eligible to inherit royal prerogatives -- you didn't VOTE for King, but you can inherit a 'feudal title' which had for its basis 'allegiance' to the Crown.<br /><br />Vattel 'natural born' argues 'citizenship' in a 'Republic.' Vattel was Swiss, and Switzerland had already been a Republic since <br />August 1, 1291, or almost 500 years before the U.S. Constitution was adopted.Bobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12433349430390224035noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-10202081598847852122010-11-19T03:09:43.650-05:002010-11-19T03:09:43.650-05:00Did you see this post by bushpilot1
"2003 Su...Did you see this post by bushpilot1<br /><br />"2003 Supreme Court: For 200 years domestic law of the US recognizes the Law of Nations(Vattel)"<br /><br /><br />http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2625035/postsJoehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12343959316501286996noreply@blogger.com