tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post5142313135899896302..comments2024-03-02T14:24:03.076-05:00Comments on Natural Born Citizen - A Place to Ask Questions and Get the Right Answers: Is the State of Hawaii Covering Up Birth Registration Fraud in the Case of Obama? Hawaii Law Makers Contemplating Stopping Concerned Americans from Investigating Whether Obama Was Born There. A Catalog of Evidence for and Against Obama's Physically Being Born in Hawaii and Not Just Falsely Registered There After the Fact.Mario Apuzzo, Esq. http://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181noreply@blogger.comBlogger31125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-41787012907896144592010-04-12T22:03:59.689-04:002010-04-12T22:03:59.689-04:00Bill,
I do not understand why you make this Obam...Bill, <br /><br />I do not understand why you make this Obama birth place issue so difficult. He just provides the 1961 birth certificate and that is the end (or the beginning) of the birth place issue. Why do you ask so many difficult questions?Mario Apuzzo, Esq. https://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-145739081593305442010-04-12T00:32:10.046-04:002010-04-12T00:32:10.046-04:00In terms of logical deduction, it is absurd to dem...In terms of logical deduction, it is absurd to demand that Obama prove that he was born in Hawaii if there are no acceptable grounds for proof. Any document could be a forgery, any eyewitness could be lying, any state official could have been paid off, any memeber of the media could be dupped. Were previous presidents required to prove their citizenship under conditions where nothing can be proved?Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07330758147649877633noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-77451421425964998742010-03-23T12:55:25.456-04:002010-03-23T12:55:25.456-04:00I have seen the corrupting influence of government...I have seen the corrupting influence of government when it has control over people's lives. I have seen how decisions to be placed in nursing homes, public housing, and even hospitals controlled by government came down to whether you were loyal or not to those in power.Mario Apuzzo, Esq. https://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-59749919450622507562010-03-23T12:08:37.605-04:002010-03-23T12:08:37.605-04:00medical"
Good observations there about the &...medical"<br /><br />Good observations there about the "decision" process in the Obama Deathcare law.<br /><br />In fact, it will not be long at all before one of the prime decision points will NOT be age or current and prospective health, but rather whether or not you voted "correctly" (if we even have voting; if not it will be whether the last time voting was "allowed" in the USSA you voted for BHO and other Communists).<br /><br />It's an entire bizarre scene right out of George Orwell's "Animal Farm". If you've not read it, you should.jayjayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09845961766550552240noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-6222009544635885662010-03-23T09:54:13.428-04:002010-03-23T09:54:13.428-04:00Medical:
Are these "local panels" in th...Medical:<br /><br />Are these "local panels" in the bill or are they to follow?<br /><br />ditto on the RFID chips, I though all medical records were to be held on a central HHS server.<br /><br />Congress is interested in biometrics, i.e. the new card that you will have to present when you apply for a job. <br /><br />Must be contributing to society, hmm.. Another Michelle statement haunts me: believe me, he will make you work.Let us move forwardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01549100708314458011noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-78360503418112398522010-03-23T05:52:05.404-04:002010-03-23T05:52:05.404-04:00Medical, I see doctors who have already made their...Medical, I see doctors who have already made their plans. We are all depending upon the Cmdr and Mario to do what they can. I suspect Mario has done more Constitutional education than any lawyer in the history of the nation as millions follow the lawsuit.<br /><br />I confirm your report on MRI machines. I was part of the team that developed the first commercial super-cooled machine. Ours used 1.5 Kgauss magnetic field strength. GE was about 1 1/2 years behind us, but got the FDA to hold up our filed approval with the claim that their non-shipping 3Kg machine might be safer than ours! It is wonderful technology which inspired me to depart a govt. lab for the commercial world.<br /><br />Before that I was pretty naive about government corruption.<br /><br />A good friend, a North Bay GP, with a Phd in chem eng as well his MD, a natural born citizen with Taiwanese parents, is leaving Calif for Singapore in a month. He had already refused medicare patients because the generated negative cash flow was intolerable. He guessed that about a quarter of his medicare patients were illegal, using false documents, adding insult to injury. He was born and raised in SF, Nancy Pelosi country, and is taking his family to a country where practicing medicine is less restricted. Singapore has a very successful medical savings account system - so successful that the country boasts of reinvesting money made from moderate taxes on the medical savings accounts in their highway system (not a very large one, but not so large a population).Spauldinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13138311172146675300noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-72064645705649465042010-03-23T01:22:05.209-04:002010-03-23T01:22:05.209-04:00@ Let us move forward - God forbid that you devel...@ Let us move forward - God forbid that you develop two expensive to treat life threatening chronic medical issues concurrently. For example, a bicuspid aortic valve with severe regurgitation (surgical replacement of an aortic valve costs approximately $120,000), and renal failure requiring dialysis (approximately $45,000 per year, barring complications requiring hospitalization. Annual death rate for dialysis patients exceeds 20%). There will be a local panel which will instruct physicians on what treatments you are "worthy of" and which ones they're willing to pay for. They'll take into account certain issues to decide whether or not you deserve state of the art treatment (valve replacement and possibly a kidney transplant), or if you'll only be afforded "palliative care" (meaning they'll just keep you full of morphine until you die). One consideration will be age, another will be whether or not you are currently a productive member of society, yet another consideration will be whether or not you'll still be productive after your treatments have been completed. The former Medicare and Medicaid plans were far superior to the downgrading of them by the passage of "Obamacare". This outrageous and insane law will needlessly cause a great deal of suffering and snuff out many innocent lives. Also, everyone will be required to accept an F.D.A. approved injectable R.F.I.D. implant about the size of a grain of rice (already in use) known as "VeriChip" (http://www.verichipcorp.com/about_us.html) which identifies you and gives the physicians instant access to your medical history - it will eventually become your "personal identifier" for everything you do - driving, banking, etc. Hitler had instituted a similar medical plan, he simply did away with those who didn't meet certain physical and/or mental standards, too. The Usurper and his nightmare of an administration have not yet been the least bit honest with "We the People" on ANY subject. Be CERTAIN to register and vote!Larryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12254885881347846017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-77320426656930668362010-03-22T23:09:01.014-04:002010-03-22T23:09:01.014-04:00Since physicians are considering leaving their pra...Since physicians are considering leaving their practice of medicine, I wonder if a law will be passed forbidding them from doing so, ordering them to practice.<br /><br />Is it true that each syringe used will be federally taxed? Is that not insane? Who will pay the tax, physicians, hospitals, diabetics, insurance companies? What other medical equipment/supplies will the feds tax?<br /><br />Squeeze, squeeze, squeeze on health care providers - insurance company negotiated prices, outrageous billing hoops to jump through, late payments, higher cost of supplies, malpractice insurance, now federal "not income" taxes.Let us move forwardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01549100708314458011noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-81342419911671354862010-03-22T18:50:41.793-04:002010-03-22T18:50:41.793-04:00I lease and sell medical diagnostic imaging equipm...I lease and sell medical diagnostic imaging equipment, most of the very expensive equipment is mounted on walk in trailers and leased to small medical facilities. Today, I've already had three calls telling me to "please pick up the leased equipment, radiologist so and so has quit". That's sad. In the countries where socialized medicine has been in effect for quite some time, there is almost no demand for the latest, most advanced equipment, hospitals want used magnetic resonance imaging units ("m.r.i.") for "$25,000, including shipping" (WHICH IS IMPOSSIBLE!). The liquid helium cooled magnets (maintained at -268 Celsius) in the units have to be replaced on a set schedule, new or "still within specification" magnets alone cost $400,000 and up, plus installation charges. Those who complain about the cost of medical care have no idea how much physicians spend to open and maintain a practice - and much of that cost is due to silly government regulations. The Usurper has destroyed the world's most advanced healthcare system AND ruined what was left of our economy - he's sooo proud of himself. When I saw grinning, America hating, treasonous granny Pelosi prancing in with a circus clown size gavel, I immediately thought, "she's planning to give our country a symbolic death blow with that". The eligibility lawsuit MUST succeed, we want our country back!Larryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12254885881347846017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-87280690517633125942010-03-22T17:29:27.662-04:002010-03-22T17:29:27.662-04:00I think what is needed is forced prosecution of an...I think what is needed is forced prosecution of an individual or a group who then can claim a defense that Obama is ineligible and that the law is unconstitutional and therefore does not have to be followed. Such a case would be tried in a criminal court and due process would require discovery into Obama's records in order prove the defense claim. In any case, if civil lawsuits are failing, a forced criminal suit may be neccessary to claim such a defense. In that case, due process would require discovery in Obama's records and standing would absolutely clear. So it might interesting to research where criminal action is done but the defense is that Obama is ineligible and therefore that criminal action can be condoned. <br /><br />Mario,<br /><br />Are you going to post your reply brief?Jameshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01793622722554168489noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-3086598802431721312010-03-22T12:50:26.366-04:002010-03-22T12:50:26.366-04:00Mr. Apuzzo: As a health care professional, I canno...Mr. Apuzzo: As a health care professional, I cannot fathom the stupidity behind Obamacare. It's as if we are commodities, not humans, and they expect to introduce 30 million more patients overnight with the same number of professionals? Even if we started right now, it would take 4 years to generate a new crop of B.S. professionals, 6 years for Pharm.D.s, 8+ years for MDs with specialization....What are they going to do, use SS agents who crack whips and use German shepherds to get these people to run CBC panels faster, make IVs faster...what the hell??? And then they plan on setting salaries? Oh wow, talk about your INCENTIVES~! Yes, incentive to QUIT!! Or foot drag, be surly, not give a crap...<br />I tried calling Pelosi's office and was sent to a "comment line"...in their power grab, they treated us like lumps of coal, grains of wheat, commodities---but it just won't work this way.<br /><br />This is the most ill-thought-out stupid unconstitutional ridiculous...<br />unbelievably insane bill ever!<br /><br />And I will not follow what a British usurper tells me to do!Increduloushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10387112256966709689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-76673965249416649122010-03-22T11:15:37.779-04:002010-03-22T11:15:37.779-04:00The Biggest problem facing the eligibility plainti...The Biggest problem facing the eligibility plaintiffs has been the word ' injury'<br />well<br />thats now mute<br />this bill has illegal MANDATES in it--forcing all 360m Americans to have insurance---<br />thats not in the Constitution thus a plaintiff can argue that since he CANNOT AFFORD insurance he has been INJURED by an illegal mandate.<br />ALSO<br />there must be legall arguments concerning the ABORTION issue and the ex order the usurper signed since he is not legally the President<br /><br />please write a blog on your view of this position.<br />RAS<br />Philadelphiarichard a stevenshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02263759798937699964noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-86209774739833708272010-03-22T05:26:28.859-04:002010-03-22T05:26:28.859-04:00Re: Obamacare
Do we have to follow what a British ...Re: Obamacare<br />Do we have to follow what a British citizen tells us to do?Increduloushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10387112256966709689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-67552275106874579522010-03-20T16:57:32.816-04:002010-03-20T16:57:32.816-04:00"In the wake of 9/11...I will stand with them..."In the wake of 9/11...I will stand with them (Muslims) should the political winds shift in an ugly direction." "So let me say this as clearly as I can -- the United States is not and will never be at war with Islam." BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA. I'd LOVE to see Larry Sinclair and Pastor James David Manning elected to Congress. I can just imagine the Usurper stuttering, stammering, and dripping perspiration during a speech before the Congress as he attempts to keep one eye on the teleprompter and the other on his two most outspoken detractors.Larryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12254885881347846017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-56812072814779240232010-03-19T15:57:36.706-04:002010-03-19T15:57:36.706-04:00medical has left a new comment on your post "...medical has left a new comment on your post "Hawaii Law Makers Contemplating Stopping Concerned...":<br /><br />(PART II) "The basis of our political systems is the right of the people to make and to alter their Constitutions of Government. But the Constitution which at any time exists, 'till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole People is sacredly obligatory upon all."<br />George Washington, Farewell Address, September 19, 1796 "But a Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored. Liberty, once lost, is lost forever."<br />John Adams, letter to Abigail Adams, July 17, 1775 The Founding Fathers forewarned us, justice must prevail or our nation shall be ruined. Should the courts and Congress ignore our pleas for justice, we shall be left with [editor's deletion].Mario Apuzzo, Esq. https://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-17192880224340418062010-03-19T13:38:31.312-04:002010-03-19T13:38:31.312-04:00"Against the insidious wiles of foreign influ..."Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence, (I conjure you to believe me fellow citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake; since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of Republican Government."<br />George Washington, Farewell Address, September 19, 1796 "Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people, who have a right, from the frame of their nature, to knowledge, as their great Creator, who does nothing in vain, has given them understandings, and a desire to know; but besides this, they have a right, an indisputable, unalienable, indefeasible, divine right to that most dreaded and envied kind of knowledge; I mean, of the characters and conduct of their rulers." *(A RIGHT!)*<br />John Adams, Dissertation on Canon and Feudal Law, 1765 "In the midst of these pleasing ideas we should be unfaithful to ourselves if we should ever lose sight of the danger to our liberties if anything partial or extraneous should infect the purity of our free, fair, virtuous, and independent elections."<br />John Adams, Inaugural Address, March 4, 1797 "Let justice be done though the heavens should fall."<br />John Adams, letter to Elbridge Gerry, December 5, 1777 "The dignity and stability of government in all its branches, the morals of the people, and every blessing of society depend so much upon an upright and skillful administration of justice, that the judicial power ought to be distinct from both the legislative and executive, and independent upon both, that so it may be a check upon both, and both should be checks upon that."<br />John Adams, Thoughts on Government, 1776 "We should be unfaithful to ourselves if we should ever lose sight of the danger to our liberties if anything partial or extraneous should infect the purity of our free, fair, virtuous, and independent elections."<br />John Adams, Inaugural Address, March 4, 1797 "Judges, therefore, should be always men of learning and experience in the laws, of exemplary morals, great patience, calmness, coolness, and attention. Their minds should not be distracted with jarring interests; they should not be dependent upon any man, or body of men."<br />John Adams, Thoughts on Government, 1776 "At the establishment of our constitutions, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government. Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous; that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions, nevertheless, become law by precedent, sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the constitution, and working its change by construction, before any one has perceived that that invisible and helpless worm has been busily employed in consuming its substance. In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life, if secured against all liability to account."<br />Thomas Jefferson, letter to Monsieur A. Coray, Oct 31, 1823Larryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12254885881347846017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-84788410380266269762010-03-19T12:09:34.223-04:002010-03-19T12:09:34.223-04:00dlovvo,
Thanks. It is most always good to have a ...dlovvo,<br />Thanks. It is most always good to have a second pair of eyes double check one's research and conclusions. <br />The Birth record regarding No. 06-02. Question: Would the Office of Personnel Management accept a stripped down copy, such as a short form Certification showing no hospital or physician signature<br /> (as in the Obama forgery of 2008<br />http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html<br />http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/obamas_birth_certifcate_forgery/ ) <br />rather than the Long Form Certification of Live Birth (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=124656<br /> http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105347 http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103633<br /> )?<br /> I ask this because by comparison, New Jersey certainly in its hospital Birth Certificate and Birth Registration of the relevant periods of the 1960s (when Obama was allegedly born) and the early 1980s (when Obama allegedly went to Columbia and Harvard University) definitively shows the hospital or medical facility one is born in, and is hand signed validated by the Hospital Administrator on the BC or if County generated, on the Birth Registration short form attestation, signed off by a registrar of Vital Statistics regarding not only the name, birth, location, facility, sex, bureau seal, etc.; but also the date of registration and date the duplicate was issued on. I am curious as to what standards the OPM would use to call a Birth document as satisfactory, such as if it excludes the actual birth location, or signatories, or what have you (in your knowledge or experience regarding Hawaii in contrast to New Jersey's). Thanks.Brianroyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06460377944201908161noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-41282467264342942322010-03-19T01:16:17.532-04:002010-03-19T01:16:17.532-04:00Brianroy said...
//////////////////
Just a couple ...Brianroy said...<br />//////////////////<br />Just a couple of corrections:<br /><br />1) and 4 submitted references who are going to say nothing but good for the subject anyway,<br />Correction: The 4 listed references are questioned and then asked for others that would know the subject. A minimum of 2 unlisted references are interviewed.<br /><br />2)Notice No. 06-02, states that if a Birth Certificate is stamped "delayed", that essentially, it is no big deal, and one can accept it at face value and move on. <br />Correction: The subject does not provide a copy of the birth certificate. A release form is signed and a copy is obtained from the records of the state in which the subject was born.<br /><br />I have conducted background investigations for the Office of Personnel Management for many years and also conducted then as an active duty criminal investigator. Most of what you stated is true.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-35148978945830812112010-03-18T19:32:04.206-04:002010-03-18T19:32:04.206-04:00I have to add, that these were pictures released b...I have to add, that these were pictures released by the Obama campaign, AP, Time Magazine, ABC/NBC/CBS, from his own books--they come "from" camp Obama.<br /><br />You'd think MI6/Mossad other countries who know he's a fraud and will suffer if he's allowed to continue wouldn't help bring this reign of terror on America to a halt? Pravda's been publishing stories about Ofraud for 2+ years!Increduloushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10387112256966709689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-71169989393572728492010-03-18T18:46:47.760-04:002010-03-18T18:46:47.760-04:00And Mr. Apuzzo, Obama has a litany of proven photo...And Mr. Apuzzo, Obama has a litany of proven photoshopped historic pictures (slang term is "shooped pix"). <br />http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2458646/posts<br />Just look at these! This man's history is PURE FICTION!.<br />Then today, lamecherry found another obviously shooped picture of Ofraud from Indonesia...<br />http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2010/03/bizarre-world-of-barack-hussein-obama.html<br /><br />Whoever did these, was a poor photo-forger. They got uniforms wrong, head sizes wrong, shadows wrong, it's so bad you wonder if they don't WANT us to figure out (maybe too late) that Obama is a total enemy plant.<br /><br />The urgency of your work cannot be overstated!Increduloushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10387112256966709689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-85292522180302214262010-03-18T15:42:27.200-04:002010-03-18T15:42:27.200-04:00All:
Actually, there are other "missing piec...All:<br /><br />Actually, there are other "missing pieces" as well about "the man who would (like to) be king", aka BHO.<br /><br />Among other things, his Selective Service registration, college records, alleged possible use of Social Security numbers, etc.<br /><br />BUT HEY!!! We all know the guy wouldn't lie! (... don't we???)jayjayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09845961766550552240noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-21466049798515069392010-03-18T14:14:47.920-04:002010-03-18T14:14:47.920-04:00Not only have the wholly impotent and self importa...Not only have the wholly impotent and self important little dictator wannabes of the government of Hawai'i suspiciously repeatedly refused to obey their present laws, now they propose passing yet another. They obviously do not care that there could easily be another sneak attack upon America, one that would literally dwarf Pearl Harbor and kill millions of our Citizens within minutes. The supremely important national security interests of the United States of America trump ANY law which attempts to prevent the release of ANY documentation regarding any portion of the background of a C.I.C. Those who are fighting so hard to block the release of the Usurper's records either cannot comprehend the importance of knowing all details about the man who has "his finger on the button", or they fully comprehend and they secretly harbor the most evil of intentions. I believe the latter scenario to be the most plausible. The present holder of the office of POTUS arrogantly endangers the safety and security of every man, woman, and child in the U.S.A. by refusing to publicly open ALL his records to "We the People" in order to prove his Constitutional eligibility, his life history, and his patriotism, that should be grounds for his immediate removal. One of the Usurper's most repeated campaign promises was "complete transparency". His first official act was the signing of "Executive Order Number 13489", which sealed all his records, public and private - truthfulness is not to be found in him. His words are hollow and meaningless, he is a self-proven narcissistic pathological liar and he is not worthy of our trust, nor is a man who is so secretive and elusive concerning his background worthy of holding the highest office in this nation. "We the People" demand that ALL his records be opened for public inspection - we have a right to know the facts and he has a duty to produce them!Larryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12254885881347846017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-42624665781697568342010-03-18T12:34:44.121-04:002010-03-18T12:34:44.121-04:00In conclusion, by bypassing Article 1.7 “Every Bil...In conclusion, by bypassing Article 1.7 “Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it becomes a Law, be presented to the President of the United States. . . .But in all such cases the votes of<br />both Houses shall be determined by yeas and nays, and the names of the persons voting for and against the bill shall be entered on the journal of each House respectively.” and by bypassing Article 2.1 (in the person of Barack Obama,<br />and by bypassing the Fifth Amendment “No person shall be...deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law...."and by bypassing the 10th Amendment's "necessary and proper" clause, Article III standing is made because of the UNCONSTITUTIONALITY of the Healthcare Bill and how Speaker Pelosi and others brought it about and the illegal means they used to see its passage (if it succeeds). <br /><br />Under the Law, is this not then a class action actionable to emergency petition to the US Supreme Court, whence then Obama is legally obligated to prove his right to hold office and sign ANY legislation, especially THIS Legislation, or to exercise ANY executive authority under Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640 (1948) @ 653, http://supreme.justia.com/us/333/640/case.html<br />states: “The burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States or the prohibition of power to the states is upon those making the claim.”?<br /><br />A President receives his executive authority “either from an act of Congress or from the Constitution itself,” Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v.<br />Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579, 585 (1952).<br /><br />Further, Youngstown also states that any Executive Order must be based upon "specific statutory authority," and cannot be "based generally upon all powers vested in the President by the Constitution and laws of the United States and as President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces."<br /><br />Correct me if I am wrong, does not the US Supreme Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the challenge to an UNCONSTITUTIONAL "President" such as Obama and over any legislation he signs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331, 2201, and 2202; and in regard to the Constitution and laws of the United States? Will not the Healthcare Legislation, if it passes, potentially allow you to amend your petition and rocket right into the Supreme Court within a matter of weeks from now?Brianroyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06460377944201908161noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-41387337444371184142010-03-18T12:30:46.790-04:002010-03-18T12:30:46.790-04:00In California and now in Washington D.C., the lega...In California and now in Washington D.C., the legal briefs of Orly Taitz have stated: <br /><br />“5. Taitz has written to the CA secretary of State Debra Bowen, asking which documents she checked to ascertain Obama‟s eligibility. <br /><br />6. Bowen responded by stating that she did not check anything, but rather relied on Obama‟s statement that he is eligible.” <br />http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Taitz-v-ObamaPrelimInjunction.pdf<br /><br />WAS NOT EVEN A SINGLE pertinent document of Obama's origin checked on Obama for Presidential eligibility? This is a National Security meltdown!<br /><br />On 9-28-2005, at a Harvard University Q&A: US Supreme Court Justice Breyer described the Supreme Court’s role as “100 percent law interpretation” and “much more mechanical than you might think.” http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=508682<br /><br />In the majority opinion of 2001’s Nguyen et al. v. INS http://supreme.justia.com/us/533/53/ ,<br />one of the criteria of proving one's birth location and birth citizenship is through the 100% mechanical means of hospital records and witnesses. 533 US 53, NGUYEN ET AL. v. INS. (2001)<br />@ 54 :“The mother's relation is verifiable from the birth itself and is documented by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses to the birth.” And <br />@62:” In the case of the mother, the relation is verifiable from the birth itself. The mother's status is documented in most instances by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses who attest to her having given birth.”<br /><br /><br />Supreme Court Law therefore states that the disclosure of witnesses “TO THE BIRTH” must also demonstrate the veracity to the birth certificate or hospital records. A claim by the DoH health director is NOT legally sufficient under Nguyen.Brianroyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06460377944201908161noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-43854452564024355432010-03-18T12:25:54.491-04:002010-03-18T12:25:54.491-04:00In South Carolina, the Democratic Party’s own Caro...In South Carolina, the Democratic Party’s own Carol Fowler broad brushed that: “The South Carolina Democratic Party certifies that each candidate meets, OR WILL MEET BY THE TIME OF THE GENERAL ELECTION, or as otherwise required by law, the qualifications for the office for which he/she has filed.” (emphasis mine -- see page 2 of the pdf, dated August 14, 2008, and received 11:43 AM by the South Carolina Election Commission on August 15, 2008.)<br />http://moniquemonicat.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/obama-south-carolina-sec-of-state-respons.pdf<br /><br /><br />Fowler, it seems to me, went on promises and lies from Democratic Party Leaders and top Obama Campaign handlers, instead of having before her a de facto legal documentation. The "we'll have it for you later" excuse is, to me, that which either equals fraud or the possible intent to defraud.<br /><br />Connecticut’s Secretary of State, Susan Bysicwicz, claimed they had NO right to even ask Obama for verification to prove he was eligible to run!http://moniquemonicat.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/obama-sec-of-state-connecticuit-fax-name-removed.pdf<br /><br /><br />"As Secretary of the State of Connecticut, I do not have the statutory authority to remove a candidate from the ballot unless that candidate officially withdraws...Likewise, neither the Connecticut General Statutes nor the Constitution of the State of Connecticut authorizes me to investigate a Presidential candidate's eligibility to run for the office of President of the United States." Secretary of State, Susan Bysicwicz (Connecticut).<br /><br />She further went on to say that Attorney General Richard Blumenthal presented the Connecticut State Supreme Court Justice, Chase T. Rogers, that he made a phone call to Hawaii's Department of Health and was told to the effect, "Yeah, we got A birth certificate on Barack Obama". Vaguery. It is a fact that Foreign Births and Foreign Duplicate State of Hawaii Birth Certifications are known to be acceptable documents in and as part of Hawaii's Official State of Hawaii Birth Registry.<br /><br />When asked if Obama was born there, the answer was to the effect of "Yeah". No details as to where. Both Obama and his sister originally stated Barack was born at Queens hospital until 2006, and flip-flopped between Queens and Kapi'olani as late as 2008, Kapi'olani 1.6 miles away from Queens and a totally separate hospital and Healthcare network. <br /><br />The Attorney General of the State of Connecticut never asked if or not Barack was a "Natural Born Citizen", nor inquired to his parents, and if any Treaty with another nation had claim on Barack. <br /><br />How do we know Barack was born in Hawaii...by official documentation? No. The hearsay of what someone in Connecticut said another person on the phone told him.<br /><br />Is this kind of Keystone Cop claim to an investigation legally admissable on the part of the State of Connecticut?Brianroyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06460377944201908161noreply@blogger.com