tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post1448838356285601287..comments2024-03-02T14:24:03.076-05:00Comments on Natural Born Citizen - A Place to Ask Questions and Get the Right Answers: The Court and Congress Expected the Other to Resolve the Obama Eligibility QuestionMario Apuzzo, Esq. http://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181noreply@blogger.comBlogger73125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-75488928107222050212010-04-23T14:18:49.088-04:002010-04-23T14:18:49.088-04:00@ Dixhistory - Neither Senator Johnny Isakson, nor...@ Dixhistory - Neither Senator Johnny Isakson, nor Senator Saxby Chambliss represent the Citizens of Georgia, they only represent the interests of their major corporate benefactors and "big money". If you enjoy receiving form letters, just waste your time writing either of them, they keep plenty of form letters on hand and ready to post, all they have to do is address them and stuff them into envelopes. Don't bother going to their offices, their staff members have memorized scripts to reply to almost any question raised about the Usurper, plus, when you raise "eligibility" questions, the staff members instantly become very curt and rude. I visited both the senators' local offices with a "chip recorder" in my shirt pocket. At both offices, the answers to my inquiries were nearly identical and both contained the same key words and phrases - sooo obvious. I have no idea who is writing and distributing the scripted answers for all the senatorial and congressional offices, but it needs to be stopped.Larryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12254885881347846017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-36848985370593347482010-04-23T12:32:20.337-04:002010-04-23T12:32:20.337-04:00Incredulous,
Regarding SR511, many commentators ...Incredulous, <br /><br />Regarding SR511, many commentators make the same error regarding its application to Obama. We cannot use citizenship rules that apply to out-of-country births to control citizenship for in-country births. They are two different animals and the rules for one cannot and do not control the rules for the other. In other words, conditions that may be necessary to establish citizenship for someone born out the United States do not necessarily apply to establishing citizenship for someone born in the United States. <br /><br />The rationale for this concept is understandable. For someone who may be born out of the country, we as a nation may want more connection with U.S. citizen parents. Hence, we have the two-citizen-parent requirement (or even one parent) for out of country births. On the other hand, being born in the country, we as a nation may accept that one or even no parent connection is necessary. <br /><br />All this helps understand but does not change the meaning of an Article II "natural born Citizen." The Framers were concerned about making sure the President and Commander in Chief of the Military would have the maximum loyalty and allegiance to the nation and the Constitution. Human experience and history have shown that that maximum degree of attachment to a people is provided by the natural elements of birth in the country to citizen parents (both mother and father). <br /><br />Mario Apuzzo, Esq.Mario Apuzzo, Esq. https://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-53313671314142287142010-04-23T11:07:48.541-04:002010-04-23T11:07:48.541-04:00Might as well give you Johnny's reply to us. B...Might as well give you Johnny's reply to us. BTW...I never said a word in that letter that he makes this reply about a BC.<br /><br />http://homepages.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~texdick/ofile/000areplyofsorts.ineveraskedaboutbirthcertficate.jpgDixhistoryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04131112648747290805noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-56387420687337135312010-04-23T10:59:41.213-04:002010-04-23T10:59:41.213-04:00Medical, Isakson is my congress person and I'm...Medical, Isakson is my congress person and I'm not at all pleased with him. I asked him more than once to raise a point of order about obama being a NBC and he failed to do so.<br /><br />See one of my letters here: http://homepages.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~texdick/ofile/bushletter.jpg<br /><br /><br />I just wish we had someone that would uphold their oath to our US Constitution to run aganist the RINO. <br /><br />I also agree with every word you said about our state AG.Dixhistoryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04131112648747290805noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-53976449294720043262010-04-23T08:54:17.755-04:002010-04-23T08:54:17.755-04:00SR511 Obama concurs as cosponsor that BOTH parents...SR511 Obama concurs as cosponsor that BOTH parents must be US Citizens.Increduloushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10387112256966709689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-60513522019788487202010-04-23T03:25:35.910-04:002010-04-23T03:25:35.910-04:00Well, Georgia is about to have another Obama lover...Well, Georgia is about to have another Obama lover waiting in line for unemployment benefits. The Attorney General for the State of Georgia (an extreme far left and very arrogant Usurper worshiper), recently mysteriously decided to run for the U.S. Senate seat of Johnny Isakson, which made no sense to me, so on a hunch, I dug through state documents until I located the following pending legislation. Now it's obvious why he's searching for a cushy seat in Washington for his tender little behind. No successful law firm will touch him, he's tainted. He refused to follow the governor's lawful order to challenge the legality of Obama's "healthcare" program. Baker's political career has lost it's wings and taken a permanent nose dive. He's another incompetent "attorney", who, in my opinion, should have been disbarred long ago for his unbelievable arrogance and stupidity. Serves him right, his removal is long overdue. ("We'll drop the impeachment charges if you'll agree to resign.") http://www.legis.ga.gov/legis/2009_10/fulltext/hr1866.htmLarryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12254885881347846017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-13174827826191947182010-04-23T01:14:43.557-04:002010-04-23T01:14:43.557-04:00I just want to remind everyone of exactly which ch...I just want to remind everyone of exactly which childish group of whiny little senate HYPOCRITES first challenged and investigated the "natural born Citizen" status of a candidate prior to the last presidential election, yet THEIR candidate has yet to be properly investigated by the Congress and/or the Senate - after all, Washington pretends the Usurper can walk on water and raise the dead. As they say in the deep south, "bit dog barks first". (Now, precisely whom are you delusional Obots daring to refer to as "birthers"? Surely you speak of yourselves! The evidence against you Obots is 100% irrefutable and it has been permanently recorded for posterity.) : "Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen."<br />"IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES"<br />"April 10, 2008"<br /><br />"Mrs. MCCASKILL (for herself, Mr. LEAHY, **Mr. OBAMA**, Mr. COBURN, **Mrs. CLINTON**, and Mr. WEBB) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary." 10APRIL2008 - The ignorant Obots figuratively grasped a venomous serpent (as seen on the Gadsden revolutionary war "Don’t Tread on Me" flag) too far behind the head and he is now preparing to turn and strike. Point proven, 'nuff said.Larryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12254885881347846017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-4316521195887750772010-04-22T23:49:06.032-04:002010-04-22T23:49:06.032-04:00Incredulous,
Obama has not been tested by any le...Incredulous, <br /><br />Obama has not been tested by any legal authority. His term is no precedent.Mario Apuzzo, Esq. https://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-31340332848517823812010-04-22T21:48:09.479-04:002010-04-22T21:48:09.479-04:00Mr. Apuzzo: If Obama ekes through one term, does ...Mr. Apuzzo: If Obama ekes through one term, does that give precedent to any foreigner being president? Is this why Clarence Thomas said they are deliberately "EVADING" the issue (as in outright deceit)??Increduloushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10387112256966709689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-21718327665510917332010-04-22T20:35:44.683-04:002010-04-22T20:35:44.683-04:00Charges filed against officer who challenged Obama...Charges filed against officer who challenged Obama’s eligibility.<br /><br />They've had enough time to create all the records they need to show him born in the US. <br /><br />What they can't do is show that Obama Sr. was an American citizen thus making Obama II a dual citizen at best.<br /><br />That said I still think it obama's duty to pony up all his records since it was obama that doubled down on stupid and won.<br /><br /><br />http://homepages.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~texdick/obama.htmDixhistoryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04131112648747290805noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-32720727467830122042010-04-22T13:01:48.688-04:002010-04-22T13:01:48.688-04:00Protonius said...
Me 2 Blogger.Com (via GOOGLE sig...Protonius said...<br />Me 2 Blogger.Com (via GOOGLE sign-in) re Obama Eligibility (04-22-2010)<br />https://www.blogger.com/comment.do<br /><br />Another way of looking at the issue in response to your questions;<br /><br />1] I posit the proposition that the Courts WILL NOT hear a ‘POTUS Eligibility’ case in re: a ‘Sitting POTUS’, in that it would be an undeniable ‘Political Question’ that would be an obvious encroachment of the ‘Separation of Powers’. <br /><br />However, should a case be presented that asks, on behalf of a private citizen, whether the Government MUST acknowledge that individuals status as a NBC by virtue of that persons birth circumstances, insofar as citizenship is concerned, then, if Affirmed in the positive, as Puzo1 concurs, related cases asking the ‘political questions’ could proceed on the precedent of the Affirmation of the existence of the specific nature of NBC’s.<br /><br /><br />2] ‘Recusals’ would be appropriately requested in certain instances of questions presented to the Courts in which any of the several Justices may have conflict of prior personal interest.<br /><br />3] See #1<br /><br />4] GWB acted as CIC in the aftermath of an attack on US soil by unknown persons/countries and as CIC was executing his 1st duty to the Nation and as such immunity is implicit.<br /><br />5] See #1<br /><br />6] See #s 1 & 7<br /><br />7] Hypothetically, Once the rioting in the streets is quelled it will be obvious that the deceit and deception of the Socialist usurpation was organized ‘as if’ a Coup with both ‘domestic and foreign’ participants, and with the ENTIRE DemoRat Party being ‘suspect’ along with a large portion of the “Rino’s”, unions and community organizer groups, the Congress will be forced to ‘SELECT’ an ‘Acting POTUS & V-POTUS’ and move for a ‘Special Election’ as quickly as feasible.<br /><br />Conservative ‘leadership’, with grassroots support’, will move for ‘emergency legislation’ to review and rescind a great deal of the damage the ‘0s’ Regime has done.<br /><br />8] There is NO controlling legal authority available to answer THIS ‘Political Question’ outside of the Ballot Box.<br /><br /><br />9] That would be open and flagrantly Un Constitutional in that an Article of the Constitution can ONLY be Amended by a specific process.<br /><br />But technically, that very act would only further remove the ‘0’ from the circumstances required to have been BORN an NBC.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-67770667441375459742010-04-22T11:15:36.746-04:002010-04-22T11:15:36.746-04:00William:
I just looked up your reference on the P...<b>William:</b><br /><br />I just looked up your reference on the Phoenix Fox News website.<br /><br />The following statement is not from the AP, but from Representative Kyrsten Sinema. <br /><br /><i>A presidential candidate already is required to prove that he or she is a naturally born citizen before they can run for that office.</i><br /><br />Even though I am not a resident of her district I did send her an e-mail asking her to cite the law that justifies her statement.<br /><br />I have not had very good luck getting responses from emails to elected officials. I will certainly let you know if I do get a response from Rep. Sinema.Doubleehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09894977171356099262noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-85701106004772654412010-04-22T08:14:18.462-04:002010-04-22T08:14:18.462-04:00Hollister files en banc hearing petition. http://...Hollister files en banc hearing petition. http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2010/04/22/hollister-v-soetoro-petition-for-en-banc-hearing/Greg Gosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05618441283107952475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-30014139088354020192010-04-22T05:06:26.364-04:002010-04-22T05:06:26.364-04:00Me 2 Blogger.Com (via GOOGLE sign-in) re Obama Eli...Me 2 Blogger.Com (via GOOGLE sign-in) re Obama Eligibility (04-22-2010)<br />https://www.blogger.com/comment.do<br /><br />1. If the O-eligibility issue reaches the US Supreme Court and that Court, which now contains one and soon may contain two Obama-appointees, what would be the legal implications of that Court either refusing to hear the case or ruling on the case?<br /><br />2. If such a case come before the US Supreme Court, what legality would any hearing or any ruling on that case have if Obama's appointees on the Court choose to NOT recuse themselves from those hearings or rulings?<br /><br />3. If such a case is heard by the US Supreme Court, AND if that Court then rules that Obama is indeed lacking in proof that he is a "natural born citizen", might they, with legitimacy, be able to interpret the law in such a way as to "construct" or "recognize" "alternate forms of proof" or so as to reinterpret, in his favor, the meaning of the "natural born citizen" clause?<br /><br />4. George W. Bush, as President, was successful in getting the Congress to approve legislation -- which he then signed into law -- giving the Telecomms RETROACTIVE IMMUNITY (and, in effect, his Administration) for their reportedly hitherto-illegal participation in that wiretapping process (even though the Constitution forbids the creation of Ex Post facto laws). Thus, might there be any possibility that Congress would craft and approve a piece of legislation that would RETROACTIVELY IMMUNIZE (or in some other way protect) Obama from these eligibility-suits or that might RETROACTIVELY RE-DEFINE those eligibility-requirements in his favor? And what legitimacy would attach to HIS SIGNING of such a document into law, if, even up to the instant of signing, his eligibility EVEN TO SIGN would still be subject to the legal interpretation of the law as it exists PRIOR TO his signing?<br /><br />5. If the US Supreme Court chooses to review the Obama-eligibility issue, and even if that review might take months or years to be resolved, would it be legitimate for Obama to continue, during that time, to BE and ACT AS President, pending the Court's ultimate decision on the case?<br /><br />6. If the Supreme Court rules that Obama does NOT meet eligibility standards, what would happen to ALL the laws, ALL the Executive Orders, that he has signed, ALL the official decisions and actions that he has made as President, and, consequently, to all the decisions and actions that OTHERS -– in this and in other Governments and agencies -- took as a consequence of anything Obama had said or done as President?<br /><br />Would everything have to be "turned back”? Or would whomever is left in power -- whether in our nation or in others -- find that the most expedient route would be to RETROACTIVELY APPROVE all decisions and rulings that had occurred as a consequence of the Obama Presidency?<br /><br />7. If, hypothetically, Obama is stripped of the Presidency, who then would become President or Acting President? <br /><br />Would it be Joe Biden, considering that, in such an instance, an ineligible Presidential candidate chose Biden to be that candidate's running-mate, and also considering that if Biden had run on a ticket with someone other than Obama, the question is open as to whether that ticket would have won or lost the election? If Obama's Presidency -- and Presidential candidacy -- is determined to be illegitimate, might Biden's legitimacy to serve as replacement-President, or even as Vice President, also be open to question?<br /><br />8. If Obama DOES release what is claimed to be his actual Birth Certificate, what agency or agencies would be empowered to determine its authenticity or its lack thereof?<br /><br />9. As to the Dual Citizenship issue, could Congress pass a resolution -- or a bill that Obama would sign into law -- that would declare RETROACTIVE U.S. CITIZENSHIP on Obama's father? If so, might that avenue be a way for Obama to get around the Dual Citizenship issue?Protoniushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15959060629660621785noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-81174507068255524862010-04-21T16:48:30.548-04:002010-04-21T16:48:30.548-04:00"Those who profess to favor freedom and yet d..."Those who profess to favor freedom and yet depreciate agitation are people who want crops without plowing the ground; they want rain without thunder and lightning; they want the ocean without the roar of its many waters. The struggle may be a moral one, or it may be a physical one, or it may be both, but it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will." FREDERICK DOUGLASS.Larryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12254885881347846017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-87588569459003517682010-04-20T22:04:21.518-04:002010-04-20T22:04:21.518-04:00United Natural Born Citizen,
Your Question: How...United Natural Born Citizen, <br /><br />Your Question: How would your case be affected if the SCOTUS was to hear the questions: <br /><br />1) "Is the 'idiom' of natural born citizen' a specific description of the circumstances by which a 'citizen' acquired citizenship.<br /><br />My Response: Yes. <br /><br />Your Question: 2) What are those specific circumstances which confers the 'citizenship' of 'natural born citizen' upon such an individual.<br /><br />My Response: There are specific birth circumstances that create a "natural born Citizen." It is not sufficient to be a citizen at birth to be a "natural born Citizen," for such a status is determined not only by when the status is bestowed upon the child but also under what circumstances. If just being born a citizen was sufficient, the Framers would have written "born citizen." But they wanted more so they wrote "natural born Citizen." That more is birth in the country to a citizen mother and father. <br /><br />The Supreme Court should decide the meaning of the "natural born Citizen" by analyzing the Framers' original intent and meaning. There is no constitutional amendment changing the meaning. There also is no U.S. Supreme Court case that ever changed the original meaning of the clause. <br /><br />Any decision by the U.S. Supreme Court on the meaning of the "natural born Citizen" clause would probably be binding on any other pending cases concerning the same issue.Mario Apuzzo, Esq. https://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-3414716627170909022010-04-20T21:29:41.479-04:002010-04-20T21:29:41.479-04:00William:
There are actually several that appear i...William:<br /><br />There are actually several that appear in this video which I think will give you a pretty good idea of what they are and what they look like.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNGG8tIJNMY" rel="nofollow">Merry Christmas OmeriKa!!</a><br /><br />Also in that video is a quotation the is quite apt from a famous Senator (of course he was Roman and spoke in 42 BC but the message is still meaningful today).<br /><br />And so that people know that "words mean things" there is also this bit of fun:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsX5DzZHkIU" rel="nofollow">Three Little Words</a>jayjayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09845961766550552240noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-90847621135531540822010-04-20T19:41:18.003-04:002010-04-20T19:41:18.003-04:00A question for Puzo1;
How would your case be affe...A question for Puzo1;<br /><br />How would your case be affected if the SCOTUS was to hear the questions, (1) "Is the 'idiom' of natural born citizen' a specific description of the circumstances by which a 'citizen' acquired citizenship.<br /><br />(2) What are those specific circumstances which confers the 'citizenship' of 'natural born citizen' upon such an individual.<br /><br />It is my ARDENT belief that SCOTUS, when asked the questions absent the attached Political entanglements of a collateral attack on a sitting POTUS and being asked only to determine if a private individual has the right to know and be determined to be one, will be open to pursue the original meaning and intent which can be no other than that which WE know it to be.<br /><br />If a 'definition' is posited in a SCOTUS Opinion on the 'questions' only would your case be adversely affected?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-32052767305534262392010-04-20T17:50:23.830-04:002010-04-20T17:50:23.830-04:00Washington has become arrogant, useless, worthless...Washington has become arrogant, useless, worthless, hopelessly corrupt, and it is openly mocking and enslaving us. How can voting for a president now be considered important? ALL candidates are hand picked in secret by a small group of persons and not even one candidate represents the Citizens! When will the majority of We the People finally reach the tipping point? The sooner, the better!Larryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12254885881347846017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-67888926199410374702010-04-20T15:37:23.940-04:002010-04-20T15:37:23.940-04:00@ William - For God's sake, contact the offic...@ William - For God's sake, contact the office of AP where that story originated and demand it be corrected - NOW. Include verified supporting evidence or the bureau chief will just toss your complaint. CRUSH THEIR LIES!Larryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12254885881347846017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-39523358230458400102010-04-20T12:03:27.104-04:002010-04-20T12:03:27.104-04:00Hope you don't mind.....
I sent the informa...Hope you don't mind.....<br /><br /> I sent the information for contact of Mario to Gordon Liddy. If Gordon wishes to further support the education to the public it is my hope that he will contact Mario.Williamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16323325248452082223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-9256029767855190562010-04-20T11:15:27.939-04:002010-04-20T11:15:27.939-04:00This lady didn't think to much of dual citizen...This lady didn't think to much of dual citizenship issue. My comment was I hope they are not a wolf in sheep clothes.<br /><br />No BC in 1776 and all a BC can do is show how deep our stupidity runs.<br /><br />Of course he needs to pony up all his records to make sure he in in this country legally.<br /><br />http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/04/19/spokesperson-for-army-doctor-challenging-obamas-eligibility-speaks-with-the-post-email/<br /><br />HIGHLY-DECORATED FLIGHT SURGEON HAS REFUSED ALL ORDERS UNTIL OBAMA PROVES HIS<br />ELIGIBILITY<br />by Sharon Rondeau<br />(Apr. 19, 2010) — Margaret Calhoun Hemenway, spokeswoman for Lt. Col. Terrence<br />Lakin, an Army medical doctor who has challenged Obama's eligibility to serve as<br />Commander-in-Chief, very generously gave her time to The Post & Email last<br />Friday to discuss Lt. Col. [...]<br /> <br /><br />http://homepages.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~texdick/obama.htmDixhistoryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04131112648747290805noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-72957413871097600142010-04-20T08:49:07.928-04:002010-04-20T08:49:07.928-04:00JayJay,
What is a "Flying Monkey"?JayJay, <br /><br /> What is a "Flying Monkey"?Williamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16323325248452082223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-90946777169519550072010-04-20T07:15:23.989-04:002010-04-20T07:15:23.989-04:00Republican Rep. Judy Burges amendment to Senate Bi...Republican Rep. Judy Burges amendment to Senate Bill 1024 today would require the Arizona secretary of state to verify a presidential candidate's birth certificate before the candidate's name is allowed on a ballot in Arizona.<br /><br />The AP then throws in this statement: “A presidential candidate already is required to prove that he or she is a naturally born citizen before they can run for that office.”.....<br /><br />Really? That statement qualifies as stupid, moronic and highly misleading. I guess the AP (associated press) forgot that Obama used the 1st Amendment prior to winning the Presidential candidate seat for the Democrats claiming he has a right to run without showing any proof until he actually wins. Turns out, after winning the nomination he refused to show his documentations in question at that time as well. <br /><br />The AP also fails to mention that several S.O.S. were taken to court for failing to request Obama show documentation of qualifications, whereby the Courts held it is not the job of the S.O.S. to request documentation for any candidate on the ballot. <br /><br />The AP also fails to mention the specific law to support their statement that a legal requirement to prove a person is a natural born citizen prior to running for the office of the President of the United States. <br /><br />The AP also fails to mention what legal documents Obama turned over to prove he is a natural born citizen, as they claim. <br /><br />The AP also fails to mention the nearly 2 million dollars spent by Obama to “Prevent” the documents from being turned over to the courts to verify whether or not he meets the qualifications through proper investigations. <br /><br />The AP also fails to mention that Obama has never claimed he is a “Natural Born Citizen”, rather he has only claimed he is a “Native Citizen”. <br /><br />The AP also fails to mention that the only paper signed and given to each state was Obama’s statement that he meets the qualifications. He promises or swears that he is, end of that one. <br /><br />I wish the AP would send me the documentations they claim was shown by proof, as they say, “Prior” to any person being put on a ballot. <br /><br />I can swear and sign a paper claiming I am the King of Siam, doesn’t mean it’s so. <br /><br /> http://www.myfoxphoenix.com/dpp/news/politics/state_politics/house-oks-birther-bill-4-19-2010Williamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16323325248452082223noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7466841558189356289.post-75015054035148500712010-04-20T01:48:18.828-04:002010-04-20T01:48:18.828-04:00@ The Stacker : In October, 1990, a band called &q...@ The Stacker : In October, 1990, a band called "The New Kids on the Block" put on a cruise and concert from Port Canaveral to Nassau. The National Enquirer paid for two suites next to a band member ("Donnie Wahlberg") so I could take my family along and covertly collect info. I wasn't aware the other boat held another "pro snoop" and his family. When we arrived back at Port Canaveral, I called in my final report and they said "the investigator on the other boat told us exactly the same story, this is going to press". If they ever decide to seriously challenge the Usurper's lack of eligibility, he's finished, they'll spare absolutely no expense, they are very patient, and they demand complete silence until after the info is published - better the subject should have a pack of mute pit bulls stalking him. Their weekly readership exceeds 9,000,000 and I'm sure they would love to increase it.Larryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12254885881347846017noreply@blogger.com