This "The 3 Enablers of the Cone of Silence in Washington DC" ad shows us who are the three enablers in our American system of government who are permitting Obama's usurpation of the Office of the Presidency in violation of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution. Obama was born a British Subject under British Nationality Laws since his father was a British Subject in 1961 and was only visiting the USA.
Obama's father was never a U.S. Citizen, nor even an immigrant to the USA. Just like McCain obtained U.S. Citizen when he was born in Panama because his father was a U.S. Citizen, Obama was a British Subject when born no matter where he was born since Obama's father was a British Subject. How can a person who is born a British Subject ever be considered a "natural born Citizen" of the USA? The answer is simple, he cannot. The founders of our nation would be shocked that Obama, as subject of Great Britain, was allowed to take office as the de facto President and Commander of our military. The founders of our Republic and the framers of our Constitution intended that a "natural born Citizen" is without any doubt a person born in the country to parents who are both Citizens of the country when their child is born. That was also confirmed in a U.S. Supreme Court decision in 1874 named Minor vs Happersett. Any other status for the parents results in a child born with multiple citizenship and thus foreign claims to the allegiance of the child by birth. Most American citizens are "natural born Citizens". Obama's father was never a Citizen of the USA. Thus, Obama is NOT a "natural born Citizen" of the USA.
The caricatures of the institutions in the ad depict the ancient Asian proverb. It exemplifies those who are enabling Obama with his fraud on the American people by their See, Hear, and Speak no Evil do nothing mode on the constitutional eligibility issue. The proverb and image it calls forth is classically known in the USA to depict situations where people are turning a blind eye to the obvious. The ad depicts the situation we are in where the Congress is turning a blind eye and will not "look" at or investigate the merits of the charges. The Courts will not "hear" in a trial the merits of the charges. And the Main Stream Media will not "talk" about the merits of the charges and discuss the Constitutional eligibility issues involved with the American people nor will they dig into Obama's sealed and hidden early life records. Their ignoring the questions and concerns of the People in this matter endangers our liberty by demonstrating that those in power, once in power feel they do not have to obey the Constitution and/or listen to the People.
Charles Kerchner, Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
####
14 comments:
That surely descrives the situation and indicates who is helping in the treasonous acts against the country and its citizens.
Let's remember that when this is all history so that it doesn't happen again!!
At birth he was a British subject.
If Obama was born in Hawaii, at best he would be a dual citizen and subject to the laws of the US only while under jurisdiction of the US government.
While in the UK he is subject to the jurisdiction of the UK, President or no President.
They could charge and hold him with anything they wanted too. Our government would be powerless to assist.
This will be a problem after he is removed from office.
ENTIRE US GOVERNMENT ALREADY KNOWS OBAMA IS INELIGIBLE
http://www.eutimes.net/2010/04/entire-us-government-said-knows-obama-ineligible-for-office/
They're just wondering what the populous is going to do after enough figure it out to get down and serious about the issue. They must be scared, all of them, guilty of misprison of felony and treason and 320 million people pissed off about everything from looming war, joblessness, oil rig terrorism...on TOP of this huge fraud! Wow, if I were one of those "public servants" I'd get on my knees NOW and beg for leniency.
OH! You have to see this YouTube video of Barack "Who's Sayin" (He's a Muslim) Obama!
It can be found here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCAffMSWSzY
or at my blog here:
http://squeeky-squeek.blogspot.com/
If this doesn't wake people up, I don't know what will!
Squeeky
Girl reporter
Mr. Apuzzo: That article from Europe presents the dilemma that now that these "people" in government have made their beds and are laying in them, they don't know how to get out of them. They must know that they cannot perpetuate this false circumstance forever, and certainly history will see them for the criminals that they are because they are so exposed, but in the immediate, they need an extrication method. Remember when Cheney did not call for objections and a single congressman stood up anyway to object and he was shouted down by the ENTIRE group? What were they thinking, I mean ALL of them? They knew then that Obama was ineligible...so it's not like they needed a way out then, but now they do. Maybe they thought they could all get away with it and the masses of Americans would never notice, or not enough of them to matter. Now as Obama does what we all warned he would do--destroy America and free/fund terrorists--more and more regular Americans are opening their eyes and seeing what they intuitively knew all along...Obama is a fraud and the enemy within and they're ever more open to the truth of his ineligibility.
In short, the critical mass has arrived, Americans in too great a number know Obama is a fraud and that the entire government structure defrauded the populous. These types count on complacency, but the damages are just toooo great!
The bottom line, Mr. Apuzzo...is 'WHAT IS THEIR EXTRICATION?' and 'WHAT IS THE RESULT OF ALL THE ILLEGAL LEGISLATION?'
Do you think the Sustek bribery (Secretary of Navy job offer so he would not run against Spectre)is the extrication plan? Just to impeach Obama and get him out--God knows his regime is utterly lawless WITH the aid and abetting of many others, but is this the one crime they will punish just get him him out? Gibbs evaded the issue 12 times in WH press conference, and on tv I he said "I'm not a lawyer but lawyers in the WH and others have looked into.......and nothing inappropriate happened" and this Monday David Axelrod, Obama’s chief strategist said that the matter had been looked into and that "nothing inappropriate happened." He refused to give any details and quickly changed the subject.
So that's all they got "we say nothing inappropriate happened"
The statute is clear...it's illegal to offer ANYTHING of value in exchange for a political wish.
Obviously a job in the White house could not be made without knowledge of the president, which is a high crime and misdemeanor, an impeachable offense.
But then so is using a fraudulent social security number or being a Kenyan usurper...and about a thousand other crimes they've committed...
So why this, why now? Is it because the oil rig terrorism, the North Korea threat, the massive jobless rate, the -20 approval index for Obama, the tanking economy, the freeing/funding terrorism, the number of aware Americans, the size and energy of the Tea Party has just reached critical mass?
Obama, an enemy of the USA, is the WORST case scenario in a time of war, which is encouraging all kinds of malfeasance worldwide. Maybe a call for mere SURVIVAL will exceed political expediency in the end.
Not that I wish to help him (I know Kerchner would go hermitile at the idea!) but since McCain afterall is a natural born citizen since his father was active duty, he could at least claim a massive senile dementia over his "confusion" about the NBC issue...the bulk of the rest could play dumb...up to the point of Pelosi where she deliberately altered the DNC certification forms and key others who were obviously malicious and deliberate.
excuse the multi-posts...
but if others try the excuse of being dumbos...what about SCOTUS? The so-called experts on the Constitution? Thomas said they were evading the issue, but WHY the deceit? Who holds a guillotine over their necks?
Even Supreme Court Justices can be REMOVED for cause...Life time appointment is subject to good conduct.....evading the 'eligibility' question hiding behind 'separation of powers doctrine' while ignoring the 'matter of factual findings' which allowed the Usurpation of the office of POTUS by an ineligible person could be considered POOR CONDUCT that threatened the security of the Nation......IMO..
The below linked article was published late last year but it is well worth reading again now that the Obama KGB like spin machine is kicking into high gear online again on the internet. Read this to learn their tactics of disinformation and deceit and deception to hide the truth.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/22/10-kgb-tactics-used-by-obots-and-obama-maniacs/
CDR Kerchner
A fact that could further support the definition of natural born citizen as born on the soil of citizen parents.
English common law at the time the Constitution was written specified that all sons born to British native born subjects were, without choice, British subjects if born abroad. Sons not born on British soil of fathers not born on British soil were not bound to, but had the option to chose, allegiance to the Crown.
The second generation of British descent born in the New World would be free of all obligation to Britain in Britain's eyes. United States born parents who chose to live as Americans (whether or not formally naturalized) and raised their children as Americans would have had children who would be free from all formal allegiance to Britain (unless those children declared allegiance to Britain) by soil or descent, a possible minimum desired pedigree for the President at the time the Constitution was written.
The successive generations (third+) would have been the most free from "foreign influence," because they would be required to naturalize into British allegiance by an act of Parliament.
Let us move forward:
For citizenship matters, English Common Law did not apply with the advent of the newly-formed united States of America when the Declaration of Independence was signed on July 4, 1776.
Prior to that time there were no "citizens" but "subjects". That's what the D of I was all about, you see - to be sovereign citizens and no longer subjects.
Even on July 5, 1776 there were citizens and - as shown later in the wording of the grandfather clause of the Constitution - those adhering to the American cause were, in effect, considered to be the equivalent of "natural born Citizens" so they could be Presidentially eligible.
This country started on July 4, 1776 even though the rules to run it did not become well-formed until the Constitution in 1787. After July 4, 1776, though, there were no longer "subjects" but only "citizens".
CDR Kerchner, Sir. The links to John Greschak's work are down. Thank you, Sir.
Medical,
This link to John Greschak's writings works ...
http://www.greschak.com/essays/natborn/synopsis.htm
Tell me which essay in Mario's blog has a non-working link and I'll fix it. But I need specific guidance to find exactly where, in which essay, it is broken so I can fix it. Give me the essay name and the date it was posted, etc.
CDR Kerchner
Post a Comment